Scan barcode
ijustreallyliketrees's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Misogyny, Racism, and Sexism
Moderate: Slavery
Minor: Death and Racial slurs
marla_leonce's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
Graphic: Death, Misogyny, Racism, and Death of parent
softwindflower's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Racism and Sexism
Moderate: Death
Minor: Slavery
nannahnannah's review against another edition
4.0
Representation:
- the protagonist is black
- the love interest is not white as well (Indian? They said black at one point, but I’m wondering if it’s “in the context of the time”)
The border between England and Fairyland has become less permeable, and magic is disappearing. Zacharias Wythe, once a slave and now in the esteemed position of Sorcerer Royal, is dedicated to finding out the reason for this problem. Along the way he meets Prunella Gentleman, a spirited young woman driven from a girls’ school with an unusual talent for magic. Even though serious magic is forbidden for women (as it’s unfit for their “delicate constitutions”), together they meet with Fairy Queens and vampire sorceresses and fight the outdated, racist Society that wants Zacharias to hand in his Sorcerer Royal staff -- to keep magic in England.
Okay, I’ll admit I thought at first, “Why do all these books that deal with somewhat traditional magic systems (wands, spells, charms, etc.) have to take place in England? Why is this another one of those boring novels, and do I really want to spend time on this?”. But I give it a chance, because that writing is delicious. I also realized there are so many intricate layers to this story; everything is incredibly well thought through, and no, it’s not just “another story about magic in England”.
Zacharias Wythe is a black sorcerer, once a slave and now in a position of power at a time when the English people … (well, a lot more vocally than now) aren’t comfortable with something like this happening. Zacharias also became Sorcerer Royal in an unusual way, fueling the rest of his peers’ uneasiness and suspicions.
The layers continue to grow, with unexpected nuance and care, with the introduction of our second main character, Prunella Gentleman. She’s a spitfire and a perfect balance to Zacharias’s seriousness and somewhat melancholic nature. She’s also a character I would’ve loved to write. She’s so much fun -- and a lot of trouble. She also brings with her a contrast to Zacharias in that she’s a woman of color being presented as a lady of noble birth (which has a lovely & hilarious spin at the end! I love that every detail has been accounted for).
These layers of interest and complexity grow even further when Zacharias mentions his concerns about the other oppressed peoples in England’s conservative society, like the labouring classes and the women (who are “afflicted” by magic because it affects their “frail constitutions”). Zacharias also studies the magics of other countries in his search to bring magic back to England -- and these countries & magical cultures actually come into play, bringing with them some of the most interesting characters of the book and wonderful lore. So no, not just your standard English magical story.
Regarding the women practicing magic issue, it does get pretty heavy handed sometimes, which may put some people off, but I love where some of this goes. Here’s a quote from page 57:
”’If a girl-child makes her dolls dance, her parents admire her cleverness, and say it is of no account, for little Susan will soon outgrow such amusements. If, when she is turned fifteen, she is discovered in charms to curl her hair or brighten her eyes, she is reproved for her vanity, and told she must stop, lest she is thought fast. But no effort is made to make her understand the seriousness of her breach, and she comes to womanhood believing there is no harm in indulging in minor magics, provided she does it discreetly. And what is the result? [...] magic was too strong a force for women’s frail bodies -- too potent a brew for their weak minds -- and so, especially at a time when everyone must be anxious to preserve what magical resource England still possessed, magic must be forbidden to women.’”
Pretty standard sexism. You might expect the female protagonist’s skills would counter all this and prove it wrong by the end, right? But like I said, there’s deeper things going on here. Because funnily enough, in this world, women don’t seem to have a problem with England’s lack of magic. And “cooks, maids, charwomen, herbwives, and the females of the lower classes” are allowed to practice magics because it benefits their betters! Not only that, but there are schools for women to use magic in order to better control and eventually learn how to suppress it altogether.
(This, of course, doesn’t really leave room for anyone outside the gender binary, which is unfortunately a mistake a lot of books make when exploring oppression in a magical system where there’s a contrast between men and women. But that’s a discussion for later …)
So, yeah, there’s a lot going on, and this is just the exposition. Which leads me to say that the story starts off incredibly slow. There’s a lot to cover about Fairyland and the magic system and Societies and familiars that by the time the action really begins, it’s kind of late in the book. It feels like, finally?! But at the same time I was never really bored beforehand. If you need the action to start right off the bat, this may not be a book you’ll enjoy, but if a prose similar to Jane Austen is something you love, give it a chance. It’s really beautiful writing. Plus it has one heck of an intriguing and unpredictable twist.
Moderate: Racism and Sexism
Minor: Slavery
also: ideas of male/female sorcery that’s very limited to the binary/is trans-exclusiveasnecessaryasbread's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Graphic: Misogyny and Racism
Minor: Death and Suicide
tinyjude's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
3.5
Nonetheless, I would have enjoyed more worldbuilding, a faster pace at the beginning and more development for the love story between the main protagonists (as it felt a bit too rushed). I liked the way menstruation was treated in the story, as well as Prunella's power. I would have loved to see more of the familiars and the fairy world. I liked the complicated relationship between Zacharias and Stephen, although I was left disappointed at the fact that Zacharias didn't question him at the end why he didn't also free his parents as well.
Graphic: Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Xenophobia, and Colonisation
Moderate: Genocide, Hate crime, Slavery, Cannibalism, Death of parent, Pregnancy, and Classism
Minor: Violence and War
madamenovelist's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Racism
Moderate: Sexism and Blood
alicelalicon's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Racism and Sexism
buttermellow's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Misogyny and Racism
Moderate: Ableism, Slavery, Xenophobia, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Death
chattie_the_mad_chatter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
If you enjoy: regency period books with light hearted wittisism; amusing characters and protagonists who find their way around the rules of society and snobbery; are happy to throw magic in to historical time periods; then you will love this book.
The plot is simple, enjoyable with enough intrigue to keep you reading as to how it will all fall out. There is danger and prejudice our characters must grapple with and a need for social reform.
But the frothy delightful writing style gives me all the Georgette Heyer I need, but without class prejudice or problematic casual racism involved.
I love both protagonists, the relationship between them and the side characters, and all enjoyable banter. Our female protagonist flies her feminist flag by being her unashamed true self and getting things done. And for all those reasons I love this book. It has an abundance of charm, whilst having darker moments due to the fey world and I ate it all up. Can't wait for the next one.
Moderate: Animal death, Misogyny, Racism, Blood, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Slavery and Suicide