Scan barcode
ran_sophia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Gun violence
Moderate: Death and Murder
Minor: Confinement and War
pedanther's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Xenophobia, and Colonisation
Moderate: Ableism, Addiction, Alcoholism, Body shaming, Death, Drug use, Gun violence, Sexism, Violence, Murder, War, and Classism
Minor: Fatphobia, Physical abuse, Grief, Cannibalism, Death of parent, and Injury/Injury detail
softiejace's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Moderate: Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Gun violence, Racial slurs, Racism, Slavery, Death of parent, Murder, Colonisation, and War
Minor: Addiction and Cannibalism
orchidlilly's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, Colonisation, and Classism
Moderate: Addiction, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, and War
Minor: Ableism, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Confinement, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Sexism, Slavery, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Acephobia/Arophobia, Murder, Abandonment, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
stories's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Not to mention the impact that Love At First Sight has on narrator reliability.
Moderate: Death, Racism, Alcohol, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Drug use, Gun violence, Racial slurs, Cannibalism, Religious bigotry, Death of parent, Murder, and War
danny_fox's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
My honest rating for this book would be around 4.5, again, maybe a bit more? Since I liked this book more than the previous one, and that one I also said it's 4.5.... 4.7 maybe?
Like for my previous review on A Study In Scarlet, I will mention 3 things I liked about this book and 3 I didn't. I will also be comparing it a lot to A Study In Scarlet.
What I liked:
- We got waaaaaaay more John and Sherlock content than in the previous one. I love their relationship, so seeing that the whole book focused on them (unlike the first one) that made me quite happy. The book had a bunch of great moments and wholesome scenes between the two.
- As I mentioned before, there were a lot more fun scenes and interesting quotes. I almost gave up on the first book, but with this one, I didn't have trouble finishing it.
- We learned more about Sherlock, which I found really cool. I feel like this book gave us some more information on him, we learned some of his flaws and opinions, which makes him feel more like a real person. Characters are the most important thing to me in the stories, so I was glad they got more development.
Bonus: The last few lines in the book were so intereeeeeesting. It felt cool, but sad, but interesting. The last line really made me feel like :O.
What I didn't like:
- The mystery was eh. I found the plot from the first book (aka A Study In Scarlet) to be more interesting. The whole mystery in this book just wasn't as interesting and felt a bit slow. I was also not the fan of the whole treasure thing. The mystery from the previous book just felt more intriguing to me, but that's just my opinion, as is this whole review. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- The villain was just... kinda disappointing?? Again, I am gonna compare this to the first book, and say that the "villain" from that one is way more interesting. The murderer felt more morally gray, and when I was done reading the book, I was sort of thinking to myself "okay, sure, he killed someone, but I don't really hate him for it?" I felt more sympathy towards him.
With this dude, I just felt nothing. So I found him to be more boring.
- Again, there were some lines and things characters would say that would now be seen as offensive. It's an old book, so it goes without saying that there will be some parts that felt iffy. I would suggest looking into this topic before reading the book.
Final thoughts:
Despite it all, I think A Sign Of Four is definitely an improvement from A Study In Scarlet. Even tho the plot was not really my thing, I still enjoyed the story a lot. Seeing Sherlock and John just solve the mystery together was super fun. Looking forward to the next story in the series. :D
Graphic: Addiction, Drug use, Racism, Xenophobia, and Murder
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Gun violence and Cannibalism
caitlin_doggos's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
Graphic: Addiction, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Gun violence, Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Violence, Murder, Colonisation, War, and Injury/Injury detail