Reviews

The Sign of Four by Arthur Conan Doyle

danijoy's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

The quiet character moments between Holmes and Watson were my favorite part of this story. While undoubtedly an expertly crafted mystery, I found myself spacing out towards the mid-point only to check back in for the finale.

rlaferney's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Hired by a young lady, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson investigate the strange recent deaths of her missing father's friends from the army, as well as the whereabouts of the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.

The Sign of the Four (1890), also called The Sign of Four , is the second novel featuring Sherlock Holmes by British writer Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. It's themes deal with evil, justice, Victorian fear, empire and imperialism. The Sign of the Four has a complex plot involving service in India, the Indian Mutiny of 1857, a stolen treasure, and a secret pact among four convicts ("the Four" of the title) and two corrupt prison guards.

The Sign of the Four is an improvement over A Study in Scarlet, and is preceded by one of the best in the canon, The Hound of the Baskervilles.

The Sign of the Four is a complex mystery that features more of what we love about Sherlock and Watson (Sherlock's cunning, cold deductions, Watson's emotions and wonderment) yet it's language can be quite dated and the mystery is almost too much of a labyrinth. Still a worthwhile read though!



ashmash's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

wildflowerchild's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

boxofcats's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

3.0

emaciated_dragon's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

joelprior's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious relaxing medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

bellec's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No

3.0

heli126's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

breemortensenxox's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0