Reviews

The Mystery of Edwin Drood, by Charles Dickens, David Paroissien

adambwriter's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0


The Mystery of Edwin Drood by Charles Dickens
Final Verdict: 3.5 out of 4.0
YTD: 48

Plot/Story:
4 – Plot/Story is interesting/believable and impactful.

The Mystery of Edwin Drood is Charles Dickens’s last and unfinished novel. It was inspired, supposedly, by Dickens’s brush with death while riding aboard a train with his wife. The train derailed, and Dickens and his wife literally watched as people were flung from a bridge, to their watery deaths. The early draft of Dickens’s second-to-last novel, Our Mutual Friend was imperiled in the cabin ahead of his own, and that cabin was hanging over the edge of the bridge; Dickens risked his life, climbing into that cabin, to retrieve the manuscript and bring it back to safety. He was reportedly haunted for the rest of his life by a dark shadow (Drood) which is said to have been the ghost of a murdered man, seeking resolution/vindication from the mortal world. The back-story and history is enough to get anyone interested; but the novel itself, though unfinished, is also quite extraordinary. The prose is the most natural and flowing of any Dickens novel I have previously experienced. The situations are believable and the sometimes fanciful or caricatured personalities are done away with. The novel’s eponymous character, Edwin Drood, disappears about mid-way through the completed portion of the story. A suspect is brought in, but the readers are led to suspect another. Whether Drood is murdered, however, and –if so- who the actual culprit is, has been left to speculation because the narrative never reaches its conclusion. My edition of the book contains the famous “Trial of John Jasper” play, which was staged by some of the literary giants of the time, following Dickens’s death. Writers and critics such as George Bernard Shaw, Arthur Waugh, and G.K. Chesterton, took parts in the play, which developed extemporaneously and was one of the most popularly watched events of the day. As it is not a portion of the original book, however, I am not including it in the review (though it is highly interesting – so if you are intrigued by the story and the history around it, it is not to be missed). Lastly, the dangers of opium addiction begin to be clearly established – and Dickens’s own struggles with the drug in later life, including his self-consciousness about his own use of it – are brought into play. This makes the novel, though incomplete, rather powerful to me, due to its honesty and sensitivity.

Read the entire review at www.RoofBeamReader.net

saraishelafs's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Uhhh...it's not finished

princessleia4life's review against another edition

Go to review page

I hate to do this to you Charles as I love all your books, but this one was just bad.

caittothelin's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

cedrics_mom's review against another edition

Go to review page

Reading is fundamental as the old expression goes, and if there’s not any fun in it then it’s just mental. If you want to know what this book is about, just read the back of it. The rest of it is a slog and not any fun at all. So I’m out. I kept waiting for something to happen and muddling through Dickens‘ prose and it’s just no. September is a beautiful month and I’m not wasting it on this book anymore.

dmsnfr's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

jstamper2022's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Some parts are just like, why? Of what relevance does this have at all to the story other than a chance to use flowery prose to hit a page limit. I do wish he lived long enough to finish and polish it. There's enough of it we can infer some things so we're not completely left in the lurch from his death but enough left unwritten to leave us wanting more.

spettus's review against another edition

Go to review page

My professor had us read this for a class. This could have been a phenomenal book had he finished it and not left us hanging in the dust!!!

theliteraryphysicist's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

jasonfurman's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Once again presumptuous to rate the book. But even by Dickens' standards this would merit five stars. Perhaps the biggest frustration is the title, wishing to know whether or not it is actually a mystery -- with my reasonably strong money being on the fact that it is not. I think it was Our Mutual Friend with the preface saying something like don't congratulate yourself on solving the mystery -- it's not supposed to be one. Either way, John Jasper is a worthwhile addition to the canon of characters, as are about a half dozen others in this novel that begins and essentially ends in an opium den.