Scan barcode
abbyyy03's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Chronic illness, Confinement, Death, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual violence, Toxic relationship, Police brutality, Dementia, Trafficking, Grief, Death of parent, Gaslighting, Sexual harassment, and Deportation
mangofraiche's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Moderate: Animal death, Confinement, Death, Physical abuse, Rape, Sexual assault, Forced institutionalization, Kidnapping, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, and Abandonment
rosie_valadez's review against another edition
3.0
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Police brutality, Grief, and Death of parent
Moderate: Kidnapping
Minor: Animal death, Infidelity, and Pregnancy
tomboyaoi's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Moderate: Death, Toxic relationship, and Gaslighting
Minor: Animal death, Death of parent, and Injury/Injury detail
moxiereads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Death, Infidelity, Rape, Sexual content, and Grief
mikathereviewer's review
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
- R
Alright it would be a lie to say that either this book or the one I previously read didn't put me into a reading slump. Mainly 'cause both were slow-paced and I really can't stand slow-paced books unless I'm really really interested or investigated into the story and don't mind if it's more detailed and slower. But that rarely the case and this book didn't even have a plot, it had more vibes than anything as the characters were quite flat too.
The book was more based on meaning than anything else. So if you don't understand the meaning this book might be boring. I did understand it, but as I said the slow-pacing got on my nerves. Especially as I already understood the meaning before the story even ended in a way most would say brutal or traumatising. If you are a slow thinker or in general never was thinking a lot of existence and memory than a slow-pace might be actually good, but for me it was exhausting as I already understood the message after like 10 chapters especially as it had a reference I knew very well (even though I'm not sure if that was done on purpose, but it reminded me of it A LOT).
The reference or at least what the book reminds me of is actually national socialism. Why? First of all, we have a (police) force which tries at first in soft ways to get people to do what they want (just like the political party did) and got more and more brutal and extreme over time.
Here are a couple of examples from the book:
1. The people in the street watched tensely, some ducking into nearby alleys, and they all seemed to hope that the scene unfolding before them would be over before they themselves were pulled into it. (also acting like they saw nothing, too afraid the same happens to them)
2. “And no footsteps, or running water for the toilet.” (for those who don't know: When people hid they usually didn't ran the toilet water as it made sounds that would attract attention)
3. “But today was different somehow. They took four people at once from the center of town, in broad daylight. As far as I know, they’ve generally acted at night, on the edge of town, taking just one member of a family.” (getting more brutal over time)
4. “A safe house,”
5. The methods used by the Memory Police were becoming more and more brutal. No longer were there advance warnings of their visits. Everything happened by surprise, and they now carried heavy battering rams capable of breaking down any door. They invaded houses in search of any space where someone could be hidden—storage rooms, under beds, in the back of closets. If there was enough space for one human body, it was unlikely to escape their attention. They dragged out anyone they found, along with those who had hidden them, and loaded them all in the covered trucks.
There were lots of other things but I don't want to spoiler anything, but it remembers me a lot of national socialism and actually is the main reason I gave this book 3 stars (and not less), as I'm fascinated from fascism and national socialism. Truly sad and perhaps the reason why people say that this book is disturbing or traumatising. Since the whole police force and brutality is a major plot thing I would suggest anyone who doesn't like this or is triggered by this to not read this book.
Another reason I gave this book 3 stars even though I had a hard time reading sometimes (due to slow pace + being in a reading slump, but I think it's rather the previous book than this one that caused it); Is that I liked the message behind this book. If you didn't understand it fully or not at all I recommend to you (a lot actually) that you re-read the book someday as the message is very powerful. My quote above also helps to get the idea of what the book is trying to tell us (but not only that of course).
Very interesting message this book has and even though there is no plot or character based story the message is quite powerful and in my opinion I even think one can interpret it in many different ways and not just one which makes the message even more beautiful.
16. July 2024
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Police brutality, Death of parent, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Rape and Sexual assault
Minor: Animal death, Infidelity, and Pregnancy
calicos's review against another edition
4.0
Moderate: Grief
Minor: Animal death, Death, and Fire/Fire injury
issymaae's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Confinement, Death, and Police brutality
Moderate: Sexual assault, Grief, and Death of parent
Minor: Animal death, Infidelity, and Rape
apthompson's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.0
“His soul is too dense. If he comes out, he’ll dissolve into pieces, like a deep-sea fish pulled to the surface too quickly. I suppose my job is to go on holding him here at the bottom of the sea.”
“People—and I’m no exception—seem capable of forgetting almost anything, much as if our island were unable to float in anything but an expanse of totally empty sea.”
This novel, in its Orwellian decent, presents a surveillance-state dystopian island, where collective loss is enforced, and those who remember are systematically destroyed by The Memory Police. This a highly personal and profound type of apocalypse. The plot is reminiscent of The Diary of Anne Frank, and other real life histories of safe houses in the face or persecution; it concerns a woman’s efforts to hide one of the people who remembers, someone she cares for, in a purpose-built annex under her floorboards.
While it is, in many ways, set up like a typical dystopian novel that deftly illustrates the insidious, dehumanizing claw of totalitarianism, the true power of this novel is how it moves past the political implications of a dystopia to the very real horrors of forgetting and the destruction to society and the self this causes. There’s a quiet tension that stalks the pages of the novel. The fear, claustrophobia and struggle feel real.
If you want to read a sci-fi book that explores the effects on the individual, then definitely pick this up.
rating: ★★★★
🗺️ Reading Around the World 2024: Japan 🇯🇵
Graphic: Confinement, Violence, and Police brutality
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Death, Blood, and Abandonment
Minor: Emotional abuse, Sexual assault, Sexual content, and Grief
prickly_plant's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
The writing style and the characters kept me reading (as well as the main character’s novel).
Graphic: Confinement and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Death, Police brutality, and Grief
Minor: Animal death