Scan barcode
linw21's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Ohh I really enjoyed this book! Is it the best Ripley? No, not at all, but it was very entertaining. As someone who has been to Berlin quite a few times, the descriptions of the city were immensely interesting. I feel like some of the things are still as described and others are a simply a reflection of the political situation in Berlin at the time. That was honestly amazing. I also adored the insight into Tom’s sexuality. Contrary to what most people think I have to agree with Patricia Highsmith when she says “I don’t think Tom is gay”. He is not. In my eyes he is asexual but not quite aromantic. He obviously likes men and is envious of their relationships (see Frank and Teresa). Still he never actively tries to make out with one even when given the chance. In my books Heloïse’s and Tom’s relationship is the definition of a lavender marriage: Heloïse and her “girlfriend” meet up ever so often and go on weeklong trips together but mostly without their husbands. She and Tom rarely have sex as is stated in the book and she doesn’t expect it from him. They are both not physically attracted to each other (when we hear about Heloïse’s looks it’s mostly about her eyes and her clothes) but they get each other on an emotional level, because they are in a similar situation and that’s why they love each other - on a platonic level.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
Also, why are there People claiming that Tom Ripley becomes straighter with every book when the soundtrack to the book literally is Lou Reed’s Transformer?
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
Also, why are there People claiming that Tom Ripley becomes straighter with every book when the soundtrack to the book literally is Lou Reed’s Transformer?
alexgreenough's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
harry_lemon's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
2.5⭐
UGH! I'm so glad I'm done with this book...
Where do I even begin? I don't know what happened with Highsmith at the time, but this book just fell so far from where I could see the story going. There was so much potential for an amazing plot, it just never went anywhere that you WANTED it to go.
I personally found the addition of Frank Pierson absolutely bothersome! I will say, I did grow to like his character a little bit, but I just kept getting a lot of Bernard Tufts vibes from Ripley Under Ground. I don't feel like this character did literally anything for the story of Ripley, very disappointing.
Also, so much many of the plot points were absolutely nonsensical. I understand that this world has a lot of stretching of the imagination as to what is possible with Ripley, but I mean some of the scenes had me wondering, "Am I reading the same author who wrote The Talented Mr. Ripley?"
I'm probably being a bit harsh on this book because it was the longest of all of the books, but I also believe that this could have been edited down so much. Completely useless pieces of dialogue or scenes could have been removed to keep the reader engaged. By the third act, I was skimming pages.
I feel like I'm now obligated to finish the series, I've come so far. I'm hoping and praying that the final book doesn't let me down...
UGH! I'm so glad I'm done with this book...
Where do I even begin? I don't know what happened with Highsmith at the time, but this book just fell so far from where I could see the story going. There was so much potential for an amazing plot, it just never went anywhere that you WANTED it to go.
I personally found the addition of Frank Pierson absolutely bothersome! I will say, I did grow to like his character a little bit, but I just kept getting a lot of Bernard Tufts vibes from Ripley Under Ground. I don't feel like this character did literally anything for the story of Ripley, very disappointing.
Also, so much many of the plot points were absolutely nonsensical. I understand that this world has a lot of stretching of the imagination as to what is possible with Ripley, but I mean some of the scenes had me wondering, "Am I reading the same author who wrote The Talented Mr. Ripley?"
I'm probably being a bit harsh on this book because it was the longest of all of the books, but I also believe that this could have been edited down so much. Completely useless pieces of dialogue or scenes could have been removed to keep the reader engaged. By the third act, I was skimming pages.
I feel like I'm now obligated to finish the series, I've come so far. I'm hoping and praying that the final book doesn't let me down...
ufobabie's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
funny
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
5.0
emmavraagteken's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
monsieurbearr's review against another edition
3.0
I dont really know what to think about this one. Something I have found about these novels is that Tom has changed quite dramatically, and that he certainly isn't the Tom we met in #1. This change seems both natural and unnatural, and in a way, I miss the old, sly, kineving Tom.
The last two books have been focused a lot more on side characters, with Tom becoming himself mostly a side character, being involved mostly indirectly, I would prefer a more focused Tom story.
However, despite all this, I enjoyed this book, and I am looking forward to finishing this series with book #5.
The last two books have been focused a lot more on side characters, with Tom becoming himself mostly a side character, being involved mostly indirectly, I would prefer a more focused Tom story.
However, despite all this, I enjoyed this book, and I am looking forward to finishing this series with book #5.
sjgrodsky's review against another edition
5.0
The best Ripley so far. All three of the previous Ripleys started well but dragged towards the middle. But this one moves at warp speed! And it presents Ripley as a (semi) likeable character — a big brother, if not a father.
In fact, after a very good start, I found that the Berlin pages rather dragged. I get that Highsmith was implying, though with plausible deniability, that Ripley is gay. She’s danced around that possibility before. But I am reading this work in 2023. “He’s gay” elicits only a slightly bored response: “So what?”
The important question I struggled with after reading the last page was this: How the heck does Ripley’s heart work? If he liked Frank enough to risk his own life (by rescuing Frank from kidnappers), how can he ignore Frank’s suicidal tendencies? You have the feeling that the neglect is knowing and intentional. But why?
Of course, we are talking about Tom, the well mannered, cultured sociopath. So maybe this is a dumb question.
In fact, after a very good start, I found that the Berlin pages rather dragged. I get that Highsmith was implying, though with plausible deniability, that Ripley is gay. She’s danced around that possibility before. But I am reading this work in 2023. “He’s gay” elicits only a slightly bored response: “So what?”
The important question I struggled with after reading the last page was this: How the heck does Ripley’s heart work? If he liked Frank enough to risk his own life (by rescuing Frank from kidnappers), how can he ignore Frank’s suicidal tendencies? You have the feeling that the neglect is knowing and intentional. But why?
Of course, we are talking about Tom, the well mannered, cultured sociopath. So maybe this is a dumb question.