ria_mhrj's review against another edition
2.0
It's been a rough week, so this may have coloured my view a bit as I have precious little time for entitled man pain, but I'm still looking forward to discussing this at book club, I hope it leads to interesting discussion.
Chris/Mike's upbringing and school years were cleverly depicted alongside the present day events and I had a degree of empathy - I remember joining protests in my youth (against war and top up fees), I only just recently had a blazing row with my dad about politics, and I still rail against the injustices of the world, so teenaged Chris was someone I could relate to a little.
But adult Mike gave me the rage, I found myself very indignant on Miranda's behalf from an early stage, even knowing full well if I had met this would-be Gwyneth Paltrow in real life, I'd probably be annoyed. Mike's disdain for the charmed existence he leads really got my goat and made me a lot less caring/interested as his story and past unfolded.
Let's hope I'm less cranky on Sunday when we discuss.
Chris/Mike's upbringing and school years were cleverly depicted alongside the present day events and I had a degree of empathy - I remember joining protests in my youth (against war and top up fees), I only just recently had a blazing row with my dad about politics, and I still rail against the injustices of the world, so teenaged Chris was someone I could relate to a little.
But adult Mike gave me the rage, I found myself very indignant on Miranda's behalf from an early stage, even knowing full well if I had met this would-be Gwyneth Paltrow in real life, I'd probably be annoyed. Mike's disdain for the charmed existence he leads really got my goat and made me a lot less caring/interested as his story and past unfolded.
Let's hope I'm less cranky on Sunday when we discuss.
carolynf's review against another edition
4.0
A British man in his 50s reflects on his violent revolutionary actions 1968-1974 as his false identify is exposed. Sometimes it is difficult to tell whether what you are reading is in the present, a fantasy, or a flashback, but that fits the story of a man scrambling to trying to get a grasp on his life.
corpsewhale's review against another edition
2.0
This book was interesting in that there would be plenty of stuff going on, but I would still find I was asking myself, "is anything going to happen?!"
kakishort's review against another edition
4.0
I am reading this in an attempt to play along with The Morning News Tournament of Books.
cherylcheng00's review against another edition
4.0
The more the worker expends himself in work, the more powerful becomes the world of objects, which he creates in the face of himself, and the poorer he himself becomes in his inner life, the less he belongs to himself.
lilyn's review against another edition
informative
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
alexandraemjly's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
rdebner's review against another edition
4.0
An apparently well-researched novel about an activist/ "terrorist" from the late 60s/early 70s who disappears right before the implosion/decimation of his group, assumes a new identity, and tries to live a "normal" life -- until his past catches up with him in the form of a filmmaker-turned-informant/behind-the-scenes fixer.
While [a:Hari Kunzru|66252|Hari Kunzru|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1219956157p2/66252.jpg]'s portrait of Chris Carver/Michael Frame is not entirely sympathetic, it engages the reader to understand how one becomes moved to commit terrorist acts in the service of greater ideals. Although it helps to have some understanding of the underlying political rhetoric and of how revolutionary and activist groups of the time functioned, it's not necessary to the understanding of the novel. While it is sited in a particular history moment, its relevance is all-too-current -- global terrorism in the service of political or ideological or religious motives (the book actually connects a group that had started as an anti-war, anti-establishment cell with a Palestinian liberation organization, who trains, funds, and starts to direct the activities of the remaining group members). Domestically, there are still acts like this -- I'm thinking most specifically of environmental or animal-rights "terrorists". The major difference is that it is no longer part of a larger movement - and the overall zeitgeist & political spirit is no longer in the place to foster this wide-spread movement.
The book addresses this as well -- what happens "after" the revolution? The main character basically gets out before he can be killed - and then struggles for years to reintegrate into society (via a long detour through Asia and a number of years in Thailand). Michael Frame rather limps along, seemingly sapped of ambition and a meaningful way to connect to the world. I found myself feeling rather sad for him at the end, even with a viewpoint of someone who wasn't born until the height of this kind of political activity - thus, seeing that, in some ways, it definitely didn't pan out as intended (certainly not in the revolutionary aspect). I think that the distinction is made between the really radical /terrorist groups and the on-the-ground activists -- the latter who were the ones to effect social and political change (but these aren't really the people or the kind of change that is portrayed in the book, except in brief comparison).
Overall, an engaging and thought-provoking read.
While [a:Hari Kunzru|66252|Hari Kunzru|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1219956157p2/66252.jpg]'s portrait of Chris Carver/Michael Frame is not entirely sympathetic, it engages the reader to understand how one becomes moved to commit terrorist acts in the service of greater ideals. Although it helps to have some understanding of the underlying political rhetoric and of how revolutionary and activist groups of the time functioned, it's not necessary to the understanding of the novel. While it is sited in a particular history moment, its relevance is all-too-current -- global terrorism in the service of political or ideological or religious motives (the book actually connects a group that had started as an anti-war, anti-establishment cell with a Palestinian liberation organization, who trains, funds, and starts to direct the activities of the remaining group members). Domestically, there are still acts like this -- I'm thinking most specifically of environmental or animal-rights "terrorists". The major difference is that it is no longer part of a larger movement - and the overall zeitgeist & political spirit is no longer in the place to foster this wide-spread movement.
The book addresses this as well -- what happens "after" the revolution? The main character basically gets out before he can be killed - and then struggles for years to reintegrate into society (via a long detour through Asia and a number of years in Thailand). Michael Frame rather limps along, seemingly sapped of ambition and a meaningful way to connect to the world. I found myself feeling rather sad for him at the end, even with a viewpoint of someone who wasn't born until the height of this kind of political activity - thus, seeing that, in some ways, it definitely didn't pan out as intended (certainly not in the revolutionary aspect). I think that the distinction is made between the really radical /terrorist groups and the on-the-ground activists -- the latter who were the ones to effect social and political change (but these aren't really the people or the kind of change that is portrayed in the book, except in brief comparison).
Overall, an engaging and thought-provoking read.