mandi_lea's review

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pipsqueaky's review

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative reflective slow-paced

4.0

neolithicqueer's review

Go to review page

2.0

I do agree with the anti-capitalist statements but I can't see how anarchy would support disabled people better than a socialist state. Good base reading for those new to queer or disablity studies.

frog_appreciator's review

Go to review page

4.5

Lots of really great jumping off points here. Happy to have been introduced to emma goldman! My main criticism is how not all the essays are layman friendly, as was the purpose of the book. Some definitely were! but some threw around lots of words that if you you didn’t already understand them, you’d be lost. 

clovelatte's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative inspiring reflective medium-paced

4.0

sjbshannon's review

Go to review page

3.0

Some of these essays were better than others.

amittaizero's review

Go to review page

3.0

This book can be dense despite the editor's intent to avoid this. Sometimes it becomes buried in jargon to the point that some of the essays are unreadable - but for the most part it's worth the intermittent struggle.

cynki's review

Go to review page

3.0

It was okay. The essays kind of ranged in quality quite a bit. There were a few that really stuck out to me--the one about crip theory and the prison complex stood out to me, as well as one touching on the evolution of capitalism a little bit. But for the most part the essays felt kind of basic and not anything new to anyone who knows the basics of queer theory or anarchist theory. Quite a few of them felt a little too much like "What about the straights?". I think there's value in discussing and analyzing straight people and how they relate to their sexuality and straightness as a construct/concept, but that's not what I'm looking for in a book about queer people.

Overall I found the harder theory stuff more interesting, but the rest of it felt too much like fluff. I figure this book is aimed more at anarchists who haven't engaged with queer thought rather than the other way around.

kouma's review

Go to review page

informative inspiring slow-paced

5.0

se7en13's review

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring reflective slow-paced

4.0

Everyone gets a unicorn.