Scan barcode
honeycupreads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Bullying and Outing
Minor: Deadnaming, Drug abuse, and Hate crime
mabellene's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.75
Graphic: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Bullying and Outing
Minor: Ableism, Deadnaming, Death, Hate crime, and Racism
its_vendetta's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Religious bigotry
Moderate: Bullying
Minor: Deadnaming, Hate crime, Misogyny, Racism, Violence, Outing, Toxic friendship, Dysphoria, and Injury/Injury detail
fanboyriot's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Bullying, Hate crime, Homophobia, Transphobia, Religious bigotry, and Outing
Moderate: Ableism, Panic attacks/disorders, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Deadnaming and Dysphoria
rockythefreak's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Hate crime, Homophobia, Transphobia, Mass/school shootings, and Outing
Moderate: Ableism, Addiction, Medical content, Religious bigotry, Abortion, Outing, and Dysphoria
Minor: Deadnaming, Racism, Sexism, Slavery, and Injury/Injury detail
freewings21's review
4.0
Graphic: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Religious bigotry
Minor: Addiction, Death, Drug abuse, Gun violence, Hate crime, and Mass/school shootings
smasson13's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Technically, there was nothing wrong with it. A little cliche and as though it was filling up with as many tropes and plot devices as possible. Yet, it was so boring. The characters and writing lacked so much depth and detail.
I was expecting a YA novel and instead got a middle grade or lower reading level. As a result, the pace was slow, detail non existent, and characters were empty and unrelatable.
This might be a great option for a teen who has a lower reading level, like a high interest/low level book, but that might be it's niche.
Minor: Bullying, Deadnaming, Hate crime, Homophobia, Transphobia, Blood, Religious bigotry, Medical trauma, Pregnancy, Outing, and Dysphoria
avokaitotoast's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Minor: Hate crime and Transphobia
crufts's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Our protagonist Spencer Harris is a teenage boy who recently moved schools after being physically threatened for being trans. Concerned for his safety, his parents have gone to the trouble of moving house in order to qualify for Oakley, the most progressive school in rural Wayne County, Ohio. The school even has a "QSA" (Queer-Straight Alliance) club, which would be unimaginable at other schools in the county.
The school may be a progressive dream, but before long Spencer finds himself with two challenges. Firstly, he secretly joins the Oakley boys' soccer team - something his parents would vehemently disapprove of if they knew, due to their fears for his safety. Secondly, he develops a massive crush on soccer teammate Justice Cortes. Oh boy - and moving schools was meant to make everything simpler!
Overall I enjoyed The Passing Playbook (and enjoyed the title pun). It wasn't perfect, but there were no dealbreaking flaws. Actually, the novel got a lot of things right:
- Accurate medical details regarding Spencer's transition. The descriptions of puberty blockers and testosterone HRT were all spot-on. I also liked that
- Probably the best depiction of an autistic child I've ever seen in a book. Spencer's 8-year-old brother Theo Harris is autistic - a fact I discovered with some trepidation, considering how badly other media handles this. But Theo ended up as one of the best characters in the book. He actually reminded me of IRL autistic friends of mine, although of course like an 8-year-old version of them. This gave me the impression that the author either has first-hand experience or was very thorough with his research.
- Also a superb portrayal of a non-binary person. Riley, a non-binary student at the school, is introduced in such a way that their assigned sex is never mentioned or even hinted at. This contrasts with portrayals of non-binary people in other media which miss the point with "Oh, but are you a male non-binary or a female non-binary?". With the focus firmly placed on who they really are, not what they were born as, Riley's portrayal was a breath of fresh air.
(That's not to say that a non-binary character's assigned sex should never be mentioned in a novel, I just found this really refreshing.)
- And there's a similar nice Bi The Way moment with a minor character.
- Gripping plot with interesting challenges and dilemmas. Spencer's situation has serious stakes behind it (i.e., his physical safety and risk of being ostracized), so I was compelled to see how his story would turn out. The story also hits a number of interesting beats and tense scenes with plenty of conflict.
Now, were there any flaws? Sure - but I'm happy to say that these were (a) relatively minor, and (b) nothing to do with the book's representation of minorities.
- The pacing was fast, as driven by the author's clean, concise writing style. And that's meant to be a good thing, right? Well, sure - but the pacing was also fast during climactic scenes that could have been dramatically slowed to increase tension.
- This felt like a waste, as it seemed that the novel's scenes weren't pushed to their full potential. Spencer would take some risk, and then would receive the reward so soon afterwards that it minimized how much of a risk he'd taken. The lack of negative results to some of these risks also diminished how serious the risks were, e.g.
- There was one instance where the novel does it well, though, which was
- Relatedly, the ending rushed in very abruptly, leaving a number of plot threads untied.
- Spencer and Justice had particular character flaws that pushed them to the edge of likeability. Justice ran so hot-and-cold that I was constantly getting whiplash, and found it hard to believe that Spencer was still holding a flame for this guy. Meanwhile, Spencer just couldn't understand that Justice, a teenage boy with no financial or social resources, couldn't possibly be expected to
- I also thought it wasn't too smart of Spencer, whose medical transition and enrolment at a progressive school was due to massive effort from his parents, to throw a tantrum at them because they didn't manage to read his mind and know that he wanted them to tell him
- The narration of Spencer's reactions to Justice touching him on the arm/shoulder/hand/etc was initially intriguing since it introduced the plot point of the crush. Shivers and goosebumps, oh my! But then it kept repeating... and repeating... and repeating... until I was bored. Honestly, mentioning this two or three times is enough.
- Relatedly, I felt there was a missed opportunity of discussing Spencer's feelings about being trans and gay. Being gay is a huge issue for
- This is subjective, but I found it weird how American the book is. I mean, I've read a lot of books by American authors. They've written some of the best English-language books in existence! (Like The Great Gatsby, The Catcher in the Rye, Fahrenheit 451, Slaughterhouse-Five, Catch-22, The Color Purple, To Kill a Mockingbird, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Death of a Salesman, The Outsiders, and many more.) But this is the first time I've remarked to myself "Wow! This is just so... so... American!"
- Like the specific capitalization of "Black" but not "white" when referring to race.
- Or how Spencer was so quick assume racist intentions from his teachers (e.g.
- Or how Spencer called his dad a "blerd" ("black nerd"), again with the odd emphasis on race.
- Or how weirdly petty Spencer was over social justice topics (e.g.
- Or the sudden use of unexplained jargon dropped into the narration (e.g. "cisnormativity"). This came off as stilted in comparison to the simpler language in the rest of the novel.
- Or how Spencer asked Justice "You do believe in evolution, right?" It's the kind of question you wouldn't even need to ask in many countries.
- Again, this point is very subjective - it's just something that I found a bit odd while reading.
That seems like a lot of flaws, right? But even so, I still enjoyed the book. I think it laid out its main conflicts well, it had decent characters, it had excellent minority representation, and it achieved what it set out to achieve. Not too shabby.
If you enjoyed The Passing Playbook, I'd recommend the webcomic Check, Please!, which features a gay protagonist in a hockey team.
Graphic: Religious bigotry
Minor: Hate crime, Homophobia, Racism, Transphobia, and Outing
Religious bigotry is perhaps the strongest content warning for this book, as Spencer meets Justice's religious family and learns about their unsavoury opinions.Transphobia, outing, and a hate crime are briefly referenced in a past event and a one-line transphobic comment is made at a distance.
Racism is briefly referenced, especially regarding black/white relations in the United States, but does not actually appear in the book.
The main romantic relationship in the book is not at all explicit and remains firmly PG-rated.
There is no discrimination against Spencer's autistic brother, Theo.
horns_and_ember's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Moderate: Homophobia, Transphobia, and Religious bigotry
Minor: Bullying, Deadnaming, Hate crime, Medical content, and Outing