ipb1's review against another edition
4.0
A thoroughly entertaining mash-up of steampunk sf and murder-mystery, enhanced by a fairly deft use of partial and unreliable narration. Definite echoes of Verne and Wells, and a good light read.
snekmint's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
wickedlyethan's review against another edition
4.0
"The Prestige" is a fantasy like no other, a real treat full of unbelievably new and original ideas - you simply won't find a book like it anywhere, in many ways: structure, setting, content. However, that which makes the book great also weighs it down with some marrow-deep problems that you'll have to forgive if you want to lose yourself in the fantasy.
Firstly, the whole novel is in first-person, mostly epistolary format. This leads to a lot of "tell, not show" in the moment-to-moment revelations, if not the overall arc of the narrative.
Secondly, if you've seen the 2001 masterpiece of a film, you've ruined the book for yourself. You are no longer reading the book for itself, you are reading to see the shifts that were made in translating the source material to screen. This is a fun exercise ultimately, but nonetheless an exercise that will affect how you enjoy the novel.
IF you haven't seen the movie: read "The Prestige", then watch "The Prestige", then read "The Prestige" again.
But truly "The Prestige" is nonetheless a fascinating novel, and a look into the mind of an author who is so damn creative that you forgive his stlyistic choices because you're too busy being sucked into a world of magic, both illusory and real.
Firstly, the whole novel is in first-person, mostly epistolary format. This leads to a lot of "tell, not show" in the moment-to-moment revelations, if not the overall arc of the narrative.
Secondly, if you've seen the 2001 masterpiece of a film, you've ruined the book for yourself. You are no longer reading the book for itself, you are reading to see the shifts that were made in translating the source material to screen. This is a fun exercise ultimately, but nonetheless an exercise that will affect how you enjoy the novel.
IF you haven't seen the movie: read "The Prestige", then watch "The Prestige", then read "The Prestige" again.
But truly "The Prestige" is nonetheless a fascinating novel, and a look into the mind of an author who is so damn creative that you forgive his stlyistic choices because you're too busy being sucked into a world of magic, both illusory and real.
jack_w16's review against another edition
3.0
This was well written and structurally perfect, but ultimately forgettable with exception to the reveals. A better magic book would be the Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Klay, and that's not even a magic book.
dwhite1174's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
elinacre's review against another edition
4.0
even more twisted than the movie! i always love getting a backstage pass to magic; this was no exception!
sophiefahey's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
jinahan619's review against another edition
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
elysiumdream's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
inspiring
mysterious
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0