Scan barcode
readingoverbreathing's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
This is a difficult one for me to rate, because as much as I disliked most of the characters and thought the plot was lacking the emotional depth it really needed to carry this story, I did find myself swept up in it all anyways. Crafting a story that takes place across decades is no easy feat, but Wolitzer's writing definitely has a seductive, thoughtfully human quality to it that really saved this book for me.
But let's first talk about the characters.
I hated Jules. As conscious as she might have been of her own envy, as much as she never truly let it get in the way of her relationships, I still could not stand her. Let's not forget that when sheaccidentally revealed her best friend's lifelong family secret to her husband , her reaction afterward was "Before we get into that, can we talk about me in all of this?". That one line elicited a rare, physical gut reaction from me. Who, in those circumstances, says something like that?
I wouldn't go as far as to characterize Jules as a pick-me girl, but there is definitely a lot of "not like the other girls" energy about her. I'm pretty sure Ethan even says something to her to that effect.
As for everyone else, the only person I really liked was Ethan. Everyone else felt either too flat or too self-absorbed for me to connect with them. I think Ash's character in particular had a lot of potential, but, despite her own staunch feminism, she becomes this stereotypical perfect woman, beautiful, talented, the perfect wife and mother. I wish Wolitzer had played with her perspective at least a little bit. I think by choosing to narrate only from Jules, Ethan, and Jonah's perspectives, the story lost a lot of the depth it could have had. It's very much skewed in favor of poor, poor Jules; even Ethan's point of view is rather disgustingly consumed by thoughts of her. We actually barely see any of Jonah, whom I think also had a lot of wasted potential. Wolitzer bases his entire character around one childhood trauma and pretty much refuses to define him otherwise aside from his token gayness.
That all brings us onto the plot itself, my other major complaint. One of the book's defining plot points,Goodman's rape of Cathy , had such a sense of unreality to it, at least for me, that it was difficult to take the rest of the book seriously. I think some of this was perhaps because we were pretty removed from the event which didn't happen on page, and that a lot of the characters refused to think too hard about what happened after the fact. But this particular case was a pretty big signifier for the rest of the book, in that, as I mentioned above, there just seemed to be a lack of emotional reality to much of the plot. So much felt so surface level, like the characters themselves were half numb.
I found the choice to end the book by literallykilling off Ethan quite frankly lazy and uninspired . It was clear that Wolitzer simply could not think of any other way to end this story, and I did not appreciate the fact that she chose to eliminate the only character that I actually truly liked to accomplish this.
The negative largely out of the way, I will admit to some positives. Usually books with fake famous people really bother me, but I think because we saw the slow steady rise of Ethan and Ash's fame, that actually turned out to be one of the most believable aspects. So that was a surprise.
As I said above, though this book is quite long, Wolitzer is an excellent writer and really does suck you into this story. There's a kind of creativity to a lot of the details she includes that I always appreciate, especially in something like this that covers so much time and where it's easy to cut more of the day-to-day.
Overall, I remain for the most part in the middle about this. It's not for everyone, but it does have a certain appeal, especially if you're a fan of a decades-long character study or anything set in the 70s/80s. I would in fact pitch this as A Little Life meets Daisy Jones & The Six, just with a lot less trauma and a little less music. Take all of that as you will.
But let's first talk about the characters.
I hated Jules. As conscious as she might have been of her own envy, as much as she never truly let it get in the way of her relationships, I still could not stand her. Let's not forget that when she
I wouldn't go as far as to characterize Jules as a pick-me girl, but there is definitely a lot of "not like the other girls" energy about her. I'm pretty sure Ethan even says something to her to that effect.
As for everyone else, the only person I really liked was Ethan. Everyone else felt either too flat or too self-absorbed for me to connect with them. I think Ash's character in particular had a lot of potential, but, despite her own staunch feminism, she becomes this stereotypical perfect woman, beautiful, talented, the perfect wife and mother. I wish Wolitzer had played with her perspective at least a little bit. I think by choosing to narrate only from Jules, Ethan, and Jonah's perspectives, the story lost a lot of the depth it could have had. It's very much skewed in favor of poor, poor Jules; even Ethan's point of view is rather disgustingly consumed by thoughts of her. We actually barely see any of Jonah, whom I think also had a lot of wasted potential. Wolitzer bases his entire character around one childhood trauma and pretty much refuses to define him otherwise aside from his token gayness.
That all brings us onto the plot itself, my other major complaint. One of the book's defining plot points,
I found the choice to end the book by literally
The negative largely out of the way, I will admit to some positives. Usually books with fake famous people really bother me, but I think because we saw the slow steady rise of Ethan and Ash's fame, that actually turned out to be one of the most believable aspects. So that was a surprise.
As I said above, though this book is quite long, Wolitzer is an excellent writer and really does suck you into this story. There's a kind of creativity to a lot of the details she includes that I always appreciate, especially in something like this that covers so much time and where it's easy to cut more of the day-to-day.
Overall, I remain for the most part in the middle about this. It's not for everyone, but it does have a certain appeal, especially if you're a fan of a decades-long character study or anything set in the 70s/80s. I would in fact pitch this as A Little Life meets Daisy Jones & The Six, just with a lot less trauma and a little less music. Take all of that as you will.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Mental illness
Moderate: Cancer, Death, Drug use, Eating disorder, Rape, Sexual content, Terminal illness, and Death of parent
Minor: Vomit
There is some mention of disordered eating, and a specific case of anorexia later in the book, that is not well handled at all. At some point at a dinner party Jules takes a smidge of satisfaction in the fact that she's the only woman at the table who's actually finished her plate — just another little dig that Wolitzer uses to make sure we know that Jules is not like the other girls. I hope that if this book were published now, a decade leader, Wolitzer and her editor might have taken a harder look at some of these passages.duchesseducool's review against another edition
emotional
funny
inspiring
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug abuse, Eating disorder, Rape, Self harm, Sexual violence, and Vomit
More...