blenchbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kthudson15's review against another edition

Go to review page

This book was very good, would recommend. The only reason I DNFed is because I’m in a fragile mental state & some of the stories were sad (in a good way; I just can’t handle them currently). The last story has some content that was not helping my mental health so I decided it was better to just stop than push through. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ruthhelizabeth's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative medium-paced
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

paulaortuno's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

samdalefox's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional informative mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.75

I had first read 'The paper menagerie' as a stand alone story and loved it, so bought Liu's full short story collection. As you can see from the individual ratings below, I also loved the rest of the stories. The only one to drop below 4/5 was 'All the flavours', mostly because I don't think the structure and length entirely paid off. Outstanding pieces include 'State change', Simulacrum', 'The paper menagerie', and 'The man who ended history: a documentary'. Although the collection averaged 4.5, I'm bumping it up to 4.75 because the work is greater than the sum of its parts. 
 
It's hard to describe Ken Liu's writing style and subject matter. It's an easy to read, sci-fi, magical realism, literary, historical fiction, kind of genre. There were several times I looked up specific events referenced and learnt about Chinese and pan-Asian history. I found this incredibly enjoyable, the way history and culture are presented is informative, but in an appeasing way because it's told almost like a fairy tale. I also greatly appeciated the author's notes at the end of the stories with historical features explaining the references and pointing to further reading. 

The stories cover difficult themes such as imperialism, industrialisation, migration and immigrant experience, ethical use/misuse and philosophical development of technology, revolution and nationalism, militarianism, philosophy of communication and memory, and censorship, all with respect to Chinese people.

"Every act of communication is a miracle of translation"

The book making habits of select species 4.25⭐
State change 4.75⭐ 
The perfect match 4.25⭐
Good hunting 4⭐
The literomancer 4.5⭐
Simulacrum 5⭐
The regular 4⭐
The paper menagerie 5⭐
An advanced reader's picture book of comparative cognition 4.25⭐
The waves 4.5⭐
Mono no aware 4.5⭐
All the flavours 3.5⭐
A brief history of the trans Pacific tunnel 4.25⭐
The litigation master and the monkey king 4.75⭐
The man who ended history: a documentary 5⭐

Average = 4.43 



Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lynxpardinus's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional informative reflective sad

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kalira's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative inspiring reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Ken Lie has a brilliant approach to weaving together history and realism with fantastical/speculative fiction elements, drawing it all into poignant and deeply emotional relief.

It took me a long time to read this anthology, largely because the stories are very good . . . and sometimes, so painful and heavy and immediate that upon finishing I needed to set the book aside and take some time. Both to process the story and to give myself a little emotional space to breathe.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

wngwendy's review against another edition

Go to review page

inspiring reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

every story was sooo good

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

konfx's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging inspiring reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

missbear's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.25

I actually started this book quite awhile ago, sometime last year. I picked it up because I had heard it compared with works by Ted Chiang, who also writes sci fi short stories (I read and absolutely adored Exhalation in 2020). But I didn't really love it and put it down, with the idea that maybe with some more distance from Ted Chiang, I might like it better. Unfortunately, that didn't really happen - there were certainly stories I liked in here, and I often liked the premise and purpose of Ken Liu's writing, but a lot of the stories didn't land quite right for me. I think that one major piece of it is that I found Ted Chiang's stories to be quite optimistic and hopeful about humanity and I thought that the comparison I had heard between the two authors was because these stories would be similarly optimistic. They are really not though, on the whole - I would say that the theme of this collection is something more like "we must not forget the suffering we have caused to each other." Even when the tales are more hopeful, they are often still hopeful in a sad kind of way (i.e. "there will always be people willing to sacrifice their lives for the good of humanity.")

To that end, I found that some of these stories were quite dark and brutally violent. That's not something that I necessarily have a problem with, but it really caught me off guard in this collection and somewhat soured the experience for me. Again, this was possibly a personal issue, having gone into the collection with a mistaken impression of its contents, but I did not know that several of the stories would include (view spoiler) I actually kind of feel like Ken Liu wanted those scenes to come as a shock, or wanted them to be contrasted against stories that at first seem simple and innocent, to make a point about history and our culpability in it when we ignore/forget brutal parts of the past. And I guess I respect that as an authorial choice (plus, I do understand that its a collection of stories that were written at different times, so it's not necessarily meant to feel cohesive), but personally I found it quite jarring and I don't think it really had the intended effect on me. It almost makes me feel a bit guilty, that I'm complaining about reading about disturbing things, when I think Ken Liu's point is basically "well, these things actually happened to real people and we have a responsibility to remember that," but I can't help feeling misled.

Don't get me wrong, I did very much enjoy some of these stories ("The Waves" and "State Change" stood out especially) and I greatly respect the message that Liu is sending about history. I'm just afraid the medium was just not to my taste, whether that's my squeamishness or misleading marketing or whatever else.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings