Reviews

Il Vangelo secondo Gesù Cristo by José Saramago, Rita Desti

haorfani's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This book is amazing!

If you are religious you might find it insulting. However this book discribes the story of Jesus Christ from a more human perspective. Some events are changed of course and I think that Jose Saramago is trying to pass some messages through this. I am not sure I understood everything though.

SPOILER ALERT BELLOW
The best part of the book is when God, Devil, and Jesus are in a boat and they discuss. It have never occured to me that a part of literature can be so awesome. This part is creating so intense images and feelings that makes you believe your are there, in front of the characters and you observe the discussion!

Tottally recomend this book to anyone! This book is astonishing!

serrasa's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced

3.5

zubers's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark funny reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

michi_mar213's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.0

yasujirozu's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Until now, my favorite Saramago has been his 1982 novel, Baltasar and Blimunda. But that’s changed with The Gospel According to Jesus Christ (1991).

Saramago’s insight into the human nature and psychology is as humane, his wit as biting yet at the same time as nuanced, and therefore his humor as cunning, delicious and hilarious as ever. His atheism lends a satirical perspective to the happenings, but here he’s far subtler than he ever was in Cain (2009), whose primary objective was to be a full-on parody, a kind of Gospel on steroids.[1] It might be that people of a certain persuasion won’t be able to see the forest for the trees, but I find Saramago’s warmth and compassion for his characters the stuff of marvelous literary merit and entertainment.

Saramago’s keen eye for irony and the absurd colors the proceedings, and with lucid determinacy he shifts from the farcical to elegiac, from earthly to poetic, never losing us into the mechanics of the story or the theoretical narrative framework behind it all. It’s a beautifully told tale full of heartbreak, insecurity and not being able to know oneself, in other words, the hallmarks of what makes us human.

As for the character of Jesus, it’s too easy to put him on a pedestal, quoting Scripture with a stern face and picturesque hand-waving, because he has to tick all the doctrinal boxes of any given denomination. Saramago, however, manages to create a true personality, and it is Jesus’s torment that brings him alive. There’s nothing believable in an automaton who approaches life as if reading from a script. Saramago’s Jesus has a distinct voice, and it’s easy to feel the rough fabric of his tunic and to smell the sweat and the desert in his hair. This is a gospel worth rereading.

Endnotes:

[1] He takes on God full on, though: ”It is true that God compensated Job by repaying him twice as much as He had taken, but what about all those other men in whose name no book has ever been written, men who have been deprived of everything and been given nothing in return, to whom everything was promised but never fulfilled”, ”When, oh Lord, will You come before mankind to acknowledge Your own mistakes”, ”blessed be Your holy name, since it is forbidden to curse You”.

27 November,
2017

pedroalmeida's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Sem dúvida a melhor obra de Saramago e tenho medo de ler o resto que receio não chegue ao mesmo nível.
No Evangelho, Saramago atinge a mestria não só como escritor mas também como filósofo. Talvez pelo seu legado de ateu inveterado, escreve mais sentido o texto e mais honesto cada argumento.
Por casualidade, duvido que qualquer cristão com o mínimo de pensamento humanista não se sinta apaziguado perante um Cristo tão sofrido e tão próximo da dor humana.

antinio_navarro's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

ciotola's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

joanabpg's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

breighajc's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes

5.0