Reviews tagging 'Sexual violence'

The Exorcist: 40th Anniversary Edition by

50 reviews

biobeetle's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lunarrooster's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

esterie's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

4.0

i was expecting this book to be boring, frankly. i saw the movie when i was around 10-11 years old and thought, "nah, it's not gonna get to me!" and WELL. there are a fair few disturbing scenes, even by today standards. like, my jaw was hanging.

liked (referencing the pages in my edition specifically):
-281: Karras pondering on the feeling of cold hands on the back of his neck, the demon responds "That was me."
-316: the back and forth between the demon & karras in latin at first, then in other languages
-324: the revelation that the demon (through regan) had been speaking in reverse english, NOWONMAI = I AM NO ONE, DOGMORFMOCION = I COME FROM GOD, MARIN = Lankester Merrin
-329: the spontaneous dermatographia being written in Regan's own handwriting
-342: Chris telling Karras about Regan, then sadly saying "You've never met her". Made me tear up.
-351: Merrin going to see Regan, the demon & he staring at each other and the demon simply saying "This time, you're going to lose." ohhhhhhh the chills!!!!! the unspoken history!!!!!
-multiple times Karras' death is foreshadowed with the mention of him feeling cold hands on the back of his neck, but also on page 350 Merrin tells him a story about a priest who took care of lepers & eventually succumbed to it himself.
-i thought at first that the detective segments would bore me, but i quite liked them in the end. the conclusion that the paint from Regan's arts and crafts was the same paint used in one of the church desecration, that she was the likely culprit....... wow.
 

disliked
-i found Chris to be a deeply unlikable person early on. her internal monologue/thoughts was completely unparsable to me, and at one moment she wanly says she's taken a vow of poverty all because her financial advisor advised her to not buy a brand new sports car. massive eye roll.
-my only major criticism/frustration is that Karras is 100% certain and believes that mind reading and telekinesis is just.... normally accepted and documented incidences in psychiatry. this is a determined fact that cannot be disputed and has no other causes. it just. happens, i guess. like...... "oh no, regan opening a dresser drawer while being strapped to the bed, or knowing how to answer a question asked in latin/french/german from reading my mind is not proof of possession". ??? gtfo!!!!!! its so frustrating!!!!!! in the 70s did psychiatrists literally believe mind reading and telekinesis were real things!!!! what!!!!!! (pg 301 for ref)
 

questions
-why did one of the demon's personas sound like Dennings? just because it killed him?
-what happened to the demon at the end, was it sent back to hell because Karras died with it inside him? possession needs an invitation and no one was around?
-why did the demon just..... not untie Regan? it could clearly move objects & people. was it just using its control & fear over the people in the house, gaining pleasure from that? at one point Kinderman sees a figure move in front of Regan's window, but i can't recall if she was restrained at that time.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sjsantilli19's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

louiepotterbook's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

drewanslee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense fast-paced
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

blacksphinx's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
My feelings are complicated. I cannot possibly assign a star rating to this book.

The book itself reads more like a modern thriller than a horror, moving at a quick pace with constant swerves. The dialogue is quick and often witty. I had seen the movie a couple of times but I had forgotten what a long and winding path there is to the iconic scene chosen for the movie's poster. The language in this book astounds me. Blatty has some amazing turns of phrase, and the way he writes when following the third-person perspective of Father Marrin was exquisite. It's a true page turner to this day. It's not perfect: the character of Dennings is completely absurd, having our doubting priest character be ethnically Jewish sure is a Choice, and the ending is jarringly abrupt. I'd like to read another novel like it. 

And yet... Like how Psycho and Silence of the Lambs both explicitly state that the serial killers in the movies are not trans, and yet still fed into and reinforced narratives of bigotry about trans women, I can't help but think about this book in relation to the Satanic Panic. This book was published nine years before Michelle Remembers acted as the torch igniting the pyre of that horrid moment in history, but I can't shake the feeling that it was one of many logs present in that fire. The characters in this novel are absolutely convinced that the Black Mass exists, that blood libel is on some level real, and that in the moment it was published there were groups out there doing ritual sacrifice. Did you know when put under the highly suggestive state of hypnosis to "recall repressed memories", many people actually wind up recalling movies they've seen? How many people were convinced they were abused by a satanic cult when they were actually remembering scenes from the movie adaptation of this book? Is that the fault of the book, or the society the book was published in? I don't know and I can't stop thinking about it.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

madelinequinnee's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

A bit of a slow burn, for a book called ‘The Exorcist’ i was surprised that only the last chapter actually dealt with an exorcism, but this was still a great book to read and definitely deserving of its horror classic title. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lesel's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kyleighwhitsell's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings