alexisgarcia's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative reflective sad slow-paced

5.0

this was so informative. i think this is one of the most accessible non-fiction books i have ever read. this is because it was written in a narrative way. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

raneyak's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative sad tense slow-paced

3.5

I think the overall story is incredibly important and I appreciate the author’s dedication to centering the girls themselves in the narrative. However, the pacing was very slow during the second half of the book, which mostly focused on the court dealings. I also wasn’t in love with the author’s writing style. Some of the details seemed wholly unnecessary, such as when she points out how attractive some of the people were.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fraise's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative sad medium-paced

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

stellarheroics's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative inspiring reflective sad tense slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bad_bookworm_h's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative sad medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kaiabolland's review against another edition

Go to review page

inspiring sad medium-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

corriejn's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative sad slow-paced

3.5

Historical story, worth learning about: 5/5

This written accounting of that story: ....oh, no. 

I can only imagine that the driver of this book's popularity is readers who hadn't before encountered this historical event and were just eager to learn about it, rather than readers actually finding this to be competent, let alone skilled or compelling, writing about said history.

The writing is stilted, like a decent high school report listing off a sequence of poorly-connected chronological details found through research, with just the *very* most awkward incorporation of quotes from historical sources. Very occasionally, this is interspersed by a brief sentence or two of quite flowery and sentimental prose that the author seemed wanting to include. For the most part, though, it's a dry recounting of chronological tidbits, in very dear need of a competent and assertive editor.

There are also a number of issues with how the material is presented, ranging from astonishingly incompetent to downright creepy.

For instance, the author heavily focuses on descriptions of each girl's/woman's physical attractiveness (and not just in context for describing the later effects of their illnesses). E.g., at one point there is mention of how a doctor "examined her elegant body," apropos of nothing other than said creepy fixation on describing the conventional/physical attractiveness of the young women in question.

There are also a number of instances of use of troublingly ableist language (not as a part of historical quotes, but in the author's writings), such as (hidden as spoilers in case you don't wish to view them)
Spoiler describing the "crippled" women and, at another point, description of a woman who had difficulty speaking due to her injuries being "dumbly" present during a described situation.


Regarding the astonishing incompetence, the author at one point stresses how very fraudulent it was for Dr. Frederick Flinn to not actually be an M.D.-- which may be a valid thing to point out, if he'd in fact represented himself as a medical doctor/allowed such confusion to continue-- but by stating "his degree was in philosophy. He was... a fraud of frauds." LOL... what? See the first part, it's valid to point out the misrepresentation, but a **PhD** is not a "degree in philosophy" 😂 (It took me all of 10 seconds of googling to ascertain that he had a PhD in industrial hygiene-- he WAS indeed a Dr.! Is the author genuinely unaware that PhDs exist, and that to represent them as "a degree in philosophy!" is at least a wildly fraudulent??)

The author also at one point described a man as having an "Irish temper" 😶😬

(Brb, changing my rating from 3.75 to 3.5, because after writing all that out, it is truly baffling to me how this book ever ended up published.)

It's really a bummer, since generally when someone writes a book on a historical situation (that is very worth being told) that is popularly and well received, it kind of shuts the door to others attempting to write books on the same topic. This is a topic, however, that deserves greatly more competent handling than Moore has given it here. What a shame.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

litalia's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional inspiring sad slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

handful_of_frogs's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mandi4886's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional hopeful informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings