Reviews tagging 'Animal death'

Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck

213 reviews

squirrel66's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Eine Novelle die sich gut lesen lƤsst. Der GroƟteil ist recht deskriptiv und dialogreich und hat mich vom Stil an "Gottes Werk und Teufels Beitrag" erinnert, nur ein sehr viel kĆ¼rzerer Ausschnitt einer Lebensgeschichte. Beim Ende hat sich die Sprache m.M.n. etwas verƤndert, war ein wenig lyrischer statt sachlicher, was mir gut gefallen hat.
Das Ende hat mich echt etwas fertig gemacht, aber es hat sehr gut gepasst. Hat mir insgesamt gut gefallen und fĆ¼r die KĆ¼rze des Buches bleibt es trotzdem im Kopf.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

a_v_a9263's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

this was a beautiful book that made me rethink friendship, and also shows the danger of blind obedience

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ryleighm08's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

altbinx's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

efioa's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kearneth's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

I do understand why some people would love this (I guess), I truly hated the experience of reading this novel. I found the characters to feel performative and hollow, and I truly was not able to get anything beneficial out of reading this novel.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mayszn's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mattyvreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

It goes without saying that this book is an absolute classic. Scholars and ninth graders can agree.Ā 

This latest read through was maybe my fifth or sixth time enjoying this short story. Every time I read it, I catch some new detail that I missed the time before.Ā 

George and Lennyā€™s love for each other is palpable. It is a timeless story and message, yet paradoxically, might only be able to exist in its time. Much like all of Steinbeckā€™s work, it is a brilliant and human critique of the cruelty of capitalism. How it ā€œbreaks a manā€™s backā€ only to ā€œshoot them in the back of the damn headā€ so to speakā€¦

I am obsessed with the age old question, which might never have an answer. Is ā€œCurlyā€™s wifeā€ named such because Steinbeck was a misogynist, who didnā€™t care to give her an actual name -or- is that a purposeful statement, pointing to the inherent misogyny of the time and setting and circumstance? If I had to bet, Iā€™d say a little column A, little column B.

(As a side note: damn! Yā€™all canā€™t leave Crooks alone?)

Readers beware that this book uses the N word about 56,000 times in a total of 3 pages. (Iā€™m not an idiot. I do understand the unfortunate contextual use within the setting and historical precedent. Still though, as a modern reader, it is jarring to say the least.)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

genz_reads_classics's review against another edition

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Love the books school chose for my reading so far: Death by cancer, death by war and shot by close friend

:D

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aurjolras's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings