Reviews

Double Blind by Heidi Cullinan

boatreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I really enjoyed reading this book, it was funny, romanic and sexy. I didn't really like Randy in Special Delivery, but loved him in this book

triftwizened's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

I honestly think this is better than book 1. It’s a little slow in the middle - or perhaps beginning around the end of the first act - but act 3 is a wild ride. Really surprised by how much I liked this. 

mikilah's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Really bound the series together and gave some good depth. Interesting portrayal of therapy. Still solid.

dancpharmd's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

(Full Disclosure - I'm married to the author.)

Double Blind is the sequel/spin-off to her well-received novel Special Delivery. When she finished writing Special Delivery, Heidi declared to me that Randy really needed his own story. Randy enters Special Delivery towards the end of its second act, and I'll admit, the first time I read it, I didn't really find him incredibly sympathetic - at least not initially. But I was willing to go with it - her instincts are rarely wrong when it comes to her writing. And so Double Blind was born, written in November of 2009 - the month to which we are used to losing Heidi to NaNaWriMo.

Double Blind opens in Herod's Casino in Las Vegas with Randy watching a video feed of Ethan Ellison at the roulette table. He is betting on black over and over again, and he is also losing over and over again. Randy is well known for his ability to read people, he makes a bet with Billy Herod, the owner of the casino, that he knows exactly what Ethan's story is. But has Randy finally met his match in Ethan?

While the book is, as most of Heidi's books are, a romance between two people - and, more abstractly, four people as Sam and Mitch from Special Delivery are back for an encore performance - it also throws Mafia machinations and Vegas' games of chance into the mix. There's quite a bit of poker in the book, and for those that might be afraid to wade into it because of the poker - trust me, you don't have to worry. The rules of the game are explained very well and in such a way as they contribute to the story. Somehow, even when explaining the rules to a game, Heidi still manages to show rather than tell.

I mentioned that Double Blind is a sequel of sorts to Special Delivery, but what I love about Double Blind is that it doesn't suffer from what I refer to as "The Mummy 2 Syndrome." It resists the temptation to take what worked in its predecessor and dress it up with more bells and whistles until it collapses under its own weight. Rather than rehash the past, what happens is that the familiar shows up and goes off in new directions. Consequently, it's not essential to have read Special Delivery to enjoy Double Blind (although reading the former is highly recommended.)

As I said when I reviewed Libby Drew's State of Mind, I really like it when the main characters in m/m fiction read like real guys as opposed to (as Mrs. Giggles said in her review of Special Delivery) "little girls with a pee-pee." Nothing bugs me more than seeing these men act as if they were somehow not men - as if by virtue of their orientation, their masculinity necessarily has to be ratcheted down several notches. This bounces me out of the story and mostly just makes me angry. So when the characters seem authentically written as men, I'm in. The flip side of that is that the emotional connection between men, regardless of orientation or the presence of absence of sex, is the draw for me in these novels, and that can sometimes seem not-very-mannish. Randy even thinks this during a particularly intense scene with Mitch "What the fuck, guys don’t talk like this, not even gay guys!" But as I have said a million times, although that may be the rule, it doesn't mean that it HAS to be that way. In fact, I feel like we would all better served if we banished the kind of statement that Randy made from our collective definition of masculinity. Men of all orientations have so few examples of real emotional connection and if m/m fiction can provide this, so much the better. Too bad that straight men (who, arguably, could use the education the most) will be the least likely to read it. If anyone ever asks me why I enjoy reading m/m fiction, those are the reasons I cite.

And even if I weren't married to the author, I think Double Blind is a more than capable entry into the genre.

cadiva's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Oh I loved loved loved this one. Randy went from being a sort of pain in the arse in book one to being my favourite and his relationship with Ethan was beautifully drawn out and expressed.

Loved all the little nods to the classic Mob Vegas era in this particular book as well, the seedy secret behind the glamour.

cmira2027's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I loved Randy here, I loved his relationship with Ethan, and with Mitch and Sam.

chocolatemeerkat's review

Go to review page

5.0

Randy grew on me like a prickly cactus and now I absolutely love him. I love all of main characters and every inch of this book.

mordecai's review

Go to review page

emotional hopeful tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes

5.0

___tamara___'s review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Audio: 3 stars
Ends of words or sentences said in such a low volume it was almost impossible to hear them, sometimes even sounding like they were cut off. I don't know if the problem was the quality of the audio on Scribd or if it was the narrator, but I'm guessing it's the former because I've never had this problem with Iggy Toma's narrations before.

Story: 3.5 stars
I liked the story fine, but there was something missing. Too many poker analogies maybe and too many instances of an MC "knowing" something very specific that was not actually verbalized by the other MC because "reading people". I call bullshit.

arm167's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny inspiring mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0