Scan barcode
andreacpowers's review against another edition
3.0
3 or 4 stars. Will write a short review when I'm done with the entire thing.
glowfish36's review against another edition
DNF. I have reached the halfway point of the book which is far enough for me to decide that I am not going to continue. I was listening to this in audio format and I was horribly lost and not understanding what was going on. I may try this again in book format :)
bbrassfield's review against another edition
3.0
Hmm. Well, let me say I like what fiction I've read from Guy Gavriel Kay in the past, especially Tigana, but in reading this early novel I am afraid, while mildly entertaining, it suffers a bit much from the fact that it wants to be the Silmarillion and as such is rather a paint-by-numbers reflection. It isn't really surprising given that Kay worked with Tolkien's son Christopher on the manuscript for the Silmarillion that was first published in 1977 and yet I honestly expected something with a little more originality from this obviously talented writer.
unexpected addendum: I found a nice little review in a sadly now defunct site that agrees with me in key and yet finds much to admire despite the stock elements present in Kay's novel and so I am adding a link to the review: http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/09/20/guy-gavriel-kays-the-summer-tree-review/
unexpected addendum: I found a nice little review in a sadly now defunct site that agrees with me in key and yet finds much to admire despite the stock elements present in Kay's novel and so I am adding a link to the review: http://www.keepingthedoor.com/2009/09/20/guy-gavriel-kays-the-summer-tree-review/
gilroy0's review against another edition
5.0
A fantastic debut, now classic
I first picked up the Summer Tree by accident, an unwanted selection from a monthly book club that I failed to return in time. That was a stroke of luck, as Kay's work is a masterpiece of high fantasy. Admittedly there are rough edges and his later works shine even more brightly, but he weaves here a take worthy of comparison in scope and power to Tolkien.
I first picked up the Summer Tree by accident, an unwanted selection from a monthly book club that I failed to return in time. That was a stroke of luck, as Kay's work is a masterpiece of high fantasy. Admittedly there are rough edges and his later works shine even more brightly, but he weaves here a take worthy of comparison in scope and power to Tolkien.
aname's review against another edition
Not very pleasant on audiobook and somewhat boring storyline
griffinswing's review against another edition
4.0
This story is full of well rounded characters, earth-shattering perils, and a laundry list of fantasy tropes. TL/DR: If you like High Fantasy (as opposed to the gritty stuff currently popular) then read this and be pleased.
Tolkien is visibly present in this book. He is there in the "mortal races band together to fight evil god they already beat once-also, elves are better at everything, and there is a proud race of horse riders on the plain", and "lets have an prolog that tells a thousand years of history". Lewis is there in the "young people from our world turn out to be important in a fantasy world". There are also snips and snails from various European myths and folktales, justified in canon since Fionavar is the the "first of all worlds", so our tales are just echoes of the originals. There is an Action Girl, a High King, a Lovable Rogue, and more.
Kay has said that the book is supposed to be derivative, since he wanted to see how much emotional and moral depth he could explore within the constraints of High Fantasy, but for me the similarities were jarring. Also, the use of overly pompous syntax got on my nerves. In-book, that would have read 'On my nerves, did grow the use of overly pompous syntax'. Thankfully, it was mostly present in the only a few plot lines, those taking place in the High Kingdom (because of course there's a High King), and when the plot is on the plains with the horse-riders the writing is much more naturalistic.
There is emotional depth to the characters, and an exploration of morality, of courage and choice, and duty. One character is wracked with guilt, and must struggle to overcome it, Another is filled with shame and anger, none of them are what they seem at first introduction. They must all deal with what they learn while in the other world. I just wish the heroes, college students from our world, weren't so good at doing the fantasy stuff right away, especially the city kid who is suddenly a great warrior on horseback, or the young woman who. Oh, except for the one who's just there to .
Granted, this is the first book of a trilogy, so I am forgiving the fact that some characters just seem to be introduced and then do nothing, and the fact that it ends on a non-ending. It's not an ambiguous ending, it's just a non-ending. I have expected the words "to be continued..." to be on the bottom of the page.
What really saved this book for me is the characters. Kay is a master at breathing life into his characters, giving them both noble traits and flaws, deeply held beliefs and contradictions held just as strong. If a figure comes across as one note, it's usually because we just haven't gotten to the reveal yet.
Tolkien is visibly present in this book. He is there in the "mortal races band together to fight evil god they already beat once-also, elves are better at everything, and there is a proud race of horse riders on the plain", and "lets have an prolog that tells a thousand years of history". Lewis is there in the "young people from our world turn out to be important in a fantasy world". There are also snips and snails from various European myths and folktales, justified in canon since Fionavar is the the "first of all worlds", so our tales are just echoes of the originals. There is an Action Girl, a High King, a Lovable Rogue, and more.
Kay has said that the book is supposed to be derivative, since he wanted to see how much emotional and moral depth he could explore within the constraints of High Fantasy, but for me the similarities were jarring. Also, the use of overly pompous syntax got on my nerves. In-book, that would have read 'On my nerves, did grow the use of overly pompous syntax'. Thankfully, it was mostly present in the only a few plot lines, those taking place in the High Kingdom (because of course there's a High King), and when the plot is on the plains with the horse-riders the writing is much more naturalistic.
There is emotional depth to the characters, and an exploration of morality, of courage and choice, and duty. One character is wracked with guilt, and must struggle to overcome it, Another is filled with shame and anger, none of them are what they seem at first introduction. They must all deal with what they learn while in the other world. I just wish the heroes, college students from our world, weren't so good at doing the fantasy stuff right away, especially the city kid who is suddenly a great warrior on horseback, or the young woman who
Spoiler
magically gets to know how everything works, as long as it's plot convenientSpoiler
get kinappedGranted, this is the first book of a trilogy, so I am forgiving the fact that some characters just seem to be introduced and then do nothing, and the fact that it ends on a non-ending. It's not an ambiguous ending, it's just a non-ending. I have expected the words "to be continued..." to be on the bottom of the page.
What really saved this book for me is the characters. Kay is a master at breathing life into his characters, giving them both noble traits and flaws, deeply held beliefs and contradictions held just as strong. If a figure comes across as one note, it's usually because we just haven't gotten to the reveal yet.
kimgray0's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
I binge read this whole series in the early 2000s. I remembered enjoying them, so I gave them another try. The me of 20 years ago definitely had different tastes. You can see the influence of Tolkien, but it reads a little disjointed. Not a bad read, just didn’t love it so much at this age.