Scan barcode
thatswhatshanread's review against another edition
informative
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Hmm. This is my first foray into Burroughs’s work and, admittedly, I only read it because of the film adaptation coming out soon. I found it to be a pretty divisive novel in relation to its own characters, with little to no resolution. Which I am quite conflicted about.
This is a novel about the complexity of enduring longing and, at the same time, the simplicity of raw lust.
However, some notes—
Queer is a vast commentary on the queer scene of 1950s Mexico City, with strong emphasis on the different “classes” of queerness. Vague expatriate Lee’s attention to subtlety when discussing it aloud to someone he’s interested in (Allerton) vs his physical desires perhaps is quite obvious. The younger, more handsome Allerton is very aloof, whether by design or creation, which frustrates Lee as much as it fuels his need to be around Allerton, to capture Allerton’s gaze. Lee is a lonely extrovert seeking refuge in various rendezvous when what he desperately needs—what he finds hard to comprehend in what he wants from Allerton—in all actuality, is someone who is consistent in his affections and everyday company and will do what he asks. Allerton, meanwhile, could take him or leave him, though Lee does provide him with a sort of strange companionship he never completely disregards.
The admittance of anything is avoided outright, emotions squandered under the masculine idealisms of the times. Lee represses parts of himself that Allerton would possibly see as weak, whereas Allerton suppresses parts of himself which Lee desires. They are constantly at odds with the other even when they are under some agreement, a rather daunting dynamic that’s never really fully formed.
Lee is judgy and needy but wants to appear as a very nonchalant traveler. Except he is a drug user intent on finding some sort-of unknown stability within the unstable of another country. I found his character to be very closed-minded and biased in spite of his apparent need for universal validation, and ultimately his sexuality.
Allerton, on the other hand, is hard to define. He goes along with ideas and plans until he doesn’t, his emotional intelligence waning more often than not; however, he does have some clear lines of limitations. Though they are not always consistent.
Lee definitely takes advantage of Allerton, but then again Allerton also takes advantage of Lee; just in different ways. If Lee really is a direct reflection of Burroughs, it says a lot about his assertive nature that often seems to blur the lines when it comes to defining consensual.
The writing drew me in easily and kept me reading at a quick pace, but the story left me with many questions and concerns, especially for the real life counterparts. I don’t know what to think about Burroughs and his alternate persona, but I am excited for Luca Gaudagnino’s take on it and for the movie to expand more on nearly every point.
TL; DR situationships are probably never the answer to any of life’s questions!!
This is a novel about the complexity of enduring longing and, at the same time, the simplicity of raw lust.
However, some notes—
Queer is a vast commentary on the queer scene of 1950s Mexico City, with strong emphasis on the different “classes” of queerness. Vague expatriate Lee’s attention to subtlety when discussing it aloud to someone he’s interested in (Allerton) vs his physical desires perhaps is quite obvious. The younger, more handsome Allerton is very aloof, whether by design or creation, which frustrates Lee as much as it fuels his need to be around Allerton, to capture Allerton’s gaze. Lee is a lonely extrovert seeking refuge in various rendezvous when what he desperately needs—what he finds hard to comprehend in what he wants from Allerton—in all actuality, is someone who is consistent in his affections and everyday company and will do what he asks. Allerton, meanwhile, could take him or leave him, though Lee does provide him with a sort of strange companionship he never completely disregards.
The admittance of anything is avoided outright, emotions squandered under the masculine idealisms of the times. Lee represses parts of himself that Allerton would possibly see as weak, whereas Allerton suppresses parts of himself which Lee desires. They are constantly at odds with the other even when they are under some agreement, a rather daunting dynamic that’s never really fully formed.
Lee is judgy and needy but wants to appear as a very nonchalant traveler. Except he is a drug user intent on finding some sort-of unknown stability within the unstable of another country. I found his character to be very closed-minded and biased in spite of his apparent need for universal validation, and ultimately his sexuality.
Allerton, on the other hand, is hard to define. He goes along with ideas and plans until he doesn’t, his emotional intelligence waning more often than not; however, he does have some clear lines of limitations. Though they are not always consistent.
Lee definitely takes advantage of Allerton, but then again Allerton also takes advantage of Lee; just in different ways. If Lee really is a direct reflection of Burroughs, it says a lot about his assertive nature that often seems to blur the lines when it comes to defining consensual.
The writing drew me in easily and kept me reading at a quick pace, but the story left me with many questions and concerns, especially for the real life counterparts. I don’t know what to think about Burroughs and his alternate persona, but I am excited for Luca Gaudagnino’s take on it and for the movie to expand more on nearly every point.
TL; DR situationships are probably never the answer to any of life’s questions!!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Drug use, Infidelity, Panic attacks/disorders, Toxic relationship, Cultural appropriation, and Alcohol
Moderate: Cursing, Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Racism, Sexual content, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, Colonisation, Classism, and Deportation
Minor: Adult/minor relationship, Hate crime, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Rape, Violence, Grief, War, and Injury/Injury detail
the_clueless_tourist's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Drug use, Homophobia, Pedophilia, Racism, Cultural appropriation, Toxic friendship, and Alcohol
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Antisemitism and Cultural appropriation
avoticat's review against another edition
challenging
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
I just don't think Beats style writing is for me. I did not particularly enjoy my reading experience, largely due to the flow of the narrative moreso than the very dislikable main character (the characters can be loathable and it can still be an enjoyable read if well-written). I don't necessarily think the style is bad, just not for me.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Drug abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Grief, Stalking, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment
The main character is responsible for most of the content warnings, he's not at all likeable. There is also a degree of financial abuse he holds over his romantic relationship, which feeds into the emotional and sexual manipulation and abuse.jester_reviews's review against another edition
0.75
I hope K. Dot goes back in time to WOP WOP WOP WOP WOP this cunt into the grave. Oh my god.
I had low expectations going in because my buddy warned me but Jesus Christ on a Bike, somehow it was worse. When William wasn't coercing young menor even TEENAGERS AS YOUNG AS 12 to have sex with him, he was antisemitic, orientalist, and extremely racist against Mexicans. The other 90% was dedicated to him yapping about fuck all just to get people to pay attention to him. Which I can understand. But I also don't diddle teenagers and say that all Mexicans do is commit crime . It's dogshit. Genuinely, utter dogshit.
One of my best friends who encouraged me to read it said the only thing saving this book was the raw portrayal of loneliness as a lgbtq person and the raw writing style. Sorry buddy, I love you, but I gotta disagree. I'm a hater, first and foremost. I usually like more simplistic writing styles that are more brutalist, but for some reason, I couldn't get into it. Might be a me thing there. As for the themes, I agree that said themes are worth exploring, but the thing is that there are plenty of other books ABOUT this very subject that not only do it way better, but don't have the Main Character be a certified loverboy certified pedophile. It is a product of its time, and learning and reading about queer culture throughout history is important. But some things should be left in the past. Sometimes, things that are older, are worse.
If I wasn't giving this copy back to my friend, I'd burn it.
I had low expectations going in because my buddy warned me but Jesus Christ on a Bike, somehow it was worse. When William wasn't coercing young men
One of my best friends who encouraged me to read it said the only thing saving this book was the raw portrayal of loneliness as a lgbtq person and the raw writing style. Sorry buddy, I love you, but I gotta disagree. I'm a hater, first and foremost. I usually like more simplistic writing styles that are more brutalist, but for some reason, I couldn't get into it. Might be a me thing there. As for the themes, I agree that said themes are worth exploring, but the thing is that there are plenty of other books ABOUT this very subject that not only do it way better, but don't have the Main Character be a certified loverboy certified pedophile. It is a product of its time, and learning and reading about queer culture throughout history is important. But some things should be left in the past. Sometimes, things that are older, are worse.
If I wasn't giving this copy back to my friend, I'd burn it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Antisemitism, and Alcohol
I'm so mad the Not Like Us music video isn't out yet but if it was, the link would be here.ethanethan's review against another edition
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug abuse, Drug use, Racial slurs, and Racism
Minor: Addiction and Alcohol
caseylovett's review against another edition
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Content Warnings
Moderate: Addiction and Alcohol
Minor: Sexual assault
marianneiriss's review against another edition
challenging
dark
mysterious
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Cursing, Drug abuse, Drug use, Homophobia, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, and Alcohol
Minor: Ableism, Adult/minor relationship, Gun violence, Hate crime, Pedophilia, Police brutality, Antisemitism, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
More...