Scan barcode
ladycranstonkc's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
informative
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child death, Chronic illness, Cursing, Death, Drug use, Genocide, Gore, Gun violence, Hate crime, Mental illness, Racial slurs, Racism, Slavery, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Torture, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Grief, Medical trauma, Suicide attempt, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Fire/Fire injury, Cultural appropriation, Toxic friendship, Colonisation, War, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
calamitymeat's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.25
What am I supposed to say? How does one review Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter? How do I begin this?
I guess I will start by saying I watched the movie first. My partner had an Abraham Lincoln phase for like 3 years when they were younger, so when we were doing a movie marathon on Letterboxd and found out that it fit the criteria for the list we were following and watched it right away. And I loved it in a "this is so ridiculous, it's tone deaf, it's a white saviour movie, it's perfect." I told everyone I talked to for the following week that they needed to watch the movie because it was truly one of the most entertaining things I had ever watched.
And I just downloaded Libby and completely coincidentally, it was on the front page of my local library's October reading list. And that's when I found out it was a series. So, when I was promised Jack the Ripper and the JFK assassination in the second one, I obviously needed to read the first one so I could read that one. The book is FAR from the unbelievably insane, kind of camp in a way masterpiece that was the movie.
Normally, I would be fine with this. I understand this was a ten and a half hour audiobook (the last 20 or 30 minutes is acknowledgements, sources, etc.) and to condense that into a two hour or less movie is going to involve a lot of cuts. And I'm fine with that. It definitely worked in the movie's favour. However, the main difference was that the book was trying to be as historically accurate as possible, while the movie was a blockbuster extravaganza that did whatever the hell it wanted, like having a vampire throw a horse at Abe's head and having his axe also be part gun.
The problem with trying to be as historically accurate as possible is that this is a white author talking about slavery. And bringing vampires into slavery. And saying the ENTIRE CONFEDERACY WAS VAMPIRES AND THAT WAS WHY THEY WANTED SLAVES SO BAD. And I could accept that for the movie. The movie was not serious at all and I was able to remove myself enough to laugh at it for being tone deaf, but still not let it hinder my experience of the movie. But because the book takes itself so seriously and was so dedicated to historical accuracy, I had a much harder time removing myself from that detail.
There are a couple more things that I think should have been given another thought, specifically, it should have been shown to some sort of sensitivity reader. These things include:
I guess I will start by saying I watched the movie first. My partner had an Abraham Lincoln phase for like 3 years when they were younger, so when we were doing a movie marathon on Letterboxd and found out that it fit the criteria for the list we were following and watched it right away. And I loved it in a "this is so ridiculous, it's tone deaf, it's a white saviour movie, it's perfect." I told everyone I talked to for the following week that they needed to watch the movie because it was truly one of the most entertaining things I had ever watched.
And I just downloaded Libby and completely coincidentally, it was on the front page of my local library's October reading list. And that's when I found out it was a series. So, when I was promised Jack the Ripper and the JFK assassination in the second one, I obviously needed to read the first one so I could read that one. The book is FAR from the unbelievably insane, kind of camp in a way masterpiece that was the movie.
Normally, I would be fine with this. I understand this was a ten and a half hour audiobook (the last 20 or 30 minutes is acknowledgements, sources, etc.) and to condense that into a two hour or less movie is going to involve a lot of cuts. And I'm fine with that. It definitely worked in the movie's favour. However, the main difference was that the book was trying to be as historically accurate as possible, while the movie was a blockbuster extravaganza that did whatever the hell it wanted, like having a vampire throw a horse at Abe's head and having his axe also be part gun.
The problem with trying to be as historically accurate as possible is that this is a white author talking about slavery. And bringing vampires into slavery. And saying the ENTIRE CONFEDERACY WAS VAMPIRES AND THAT WAS WHY THEY WANTED SLAVES SO BAD. And I could accept that for the movie. The movie was not serious at all and I was able to remove myself enough to laugh at it for being tone deaf, but still not let it hinder my experience of the movie. But because the book takes itself so seriously and was so dedicated to historical accuracy, I had a much harder time removing myself from that detail.
There are a couple more things that I think should have been given another thought, specifically, it should have been shown to some sort of sensitivity reader. These things include:
Abraham Lincoln writes in his diary, "So long as this country is cursed by slavery, it will be cursed with vampires." This is described as the greatest and most important thing he ever wrote in his life. The Emancipation Proclamation would beg to differ. John Wilkes Booth hating Abraham Lincoln not because he was racist, not because he advocated that much for slavery, but because he was a vampire and Abe was a vampire hunter. All Nazis also being all vampires and the Holocaust being a second vampire uprising. Abraham finally realizing they need to do something and wage war against the south once he is told that ALL of mankind will eventually be enslaved by vampires. Just black people wasn't enough.
I just think maybe these things could potentially be left out of a revised edition.
Overall, this is a white saviour book and it is incredibly tone deaf, but I think you definitely expect that from the name and the premise alone. It works much better as a movie. It should not have taken itself so seriously. And maybe it should have been written by anyone other than a white man.
I will, of course, begin listening to the sequel immediately.
Overall, this is a white saviour book and it is incredibly tone deaf, but I think you definitely expect that from the name and the premise alone. It works much better as a movie. It should not have taken itself so seriously. And maybe it should have been written by anyone other than a white man.
I will, of course, begin listening to the sequel immediately.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Gore, Hate crime, Racism, Slavery, Violence, and War
Moderate: Child death, Suicidal thoughts, and Suicide attempt
Minor: Antisemitism
mickij's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
This book, at least to me, was utterly fascinating. Perhaps it's due to the fact that I wasn't allowed to read vampire fiction when I was younger, or perhaps it's due the historical content. Either way, I very much enjoyed this book, due in large part to the sheer amount of research it took. There are many parts that I thought were embellished or simply untrue that turned out to be historically correct.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Grief, and Murder
Moderate: Slavery, Xenophobia, Death of parent, and War
Minor: Suicide and Suicide attempt