mrears0_0's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny medium-paced

4.0

grid's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Funny, what I read of it, maybe half. I didn't feel like I needed to keep reading to get the idea. The writing style is quite archaic, and I really struggled with it.

ianbanks's review

Go to review page

5.0

Despite being 70 years old, it could have been written this morning. Hilarious.

seano's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is a very tongue in cheek book about gamesmanship. Or how to win without actually cheating.

It was written in the late 40s and it's pretty absurd in a proto-Monty Python way.

It does however have some serious points to make about getting the upper hand without being obvious. Many of the examples are clever but there's always a germ of truth in them.

Despite the content, I just couldn't give it more than three stars. Glad I read it though.
More...