Scan barcode
kimreadz's review against another edition
4.0
I liked, but didn't love, this book. It is historical fictional based on the attempted plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler, and the aftermath of the war, told from within Germany. That is a unique perspective. Most stories I've read about WWII are set in Britain or France and told from the perspective to the people in those countries. It was interesting to read the thoughts of the German possibility, and the collective shame some of them felt in the aftermath. I'd heard about that through the year, but never read about it. But as interesting as the story was, there were times I felt it bogged down, and I had to force myself to keep reading. The main character, Marianne, is judgmental, sometimes cold even to her own children, and very often not understanding to other people. Without spoiling anything, I can say that I was particularly disappointed in what happened to the character Benita. That really affected my opinion of the book. Another thing that made the book a difficult read is that I felt at times there was not enough distinction between the characters of Ania and Benita. Something would happen to one, and I'd get confused and have to go back and read an earlier section to remember which was Ania's story and which was Benita's story.
This book would be a great pick for book clubs with plenty to discuss. It was an interesting look at how Hitler came to have so much power, scapegoating a group of people and turning one group against another. How culpable were the German people in just ignoring the warning signs that all was not as Hitler led them to believe. This could lead to an interesting discussion. Other topics to discuss include the responsibility of those blindly followed orders. What obligation did they have to resist, risking their own lives in the process. A discussion the aftermath of the war—of how some German people had difficulty leaving the war behind, due to the guilt they felt, while others went about life as if the war had never happened. This is an intersting story that will be made even better with discussion!
This book would be a great pick for book clubs with plenty to discuss. It was an interesting look at how Hitler came to have so much power, scapegoating a group of people and turning one group against another. How culpable were the German people in just ignoring the warning signs that all was not as Hitler led them to believe. This could lead to an interesting discussion. Other topics to discuss include the responsibility of those blindly followed orders. What obligation did they have to resist, risking their own lives in the process. A discussion the aftermath of the war—of how some German people had difficulty leaving the war behind, due to the guilt they felt, while others went about life as if the war had never happened. This is an intersting story that will be made even better with discussion!
jenfantoni's review against another edition
3.0
This was a good book but I just didn’t love it. The premise is strong and the WWII setting is one I enjoy. It was just a bit boring at times. There are better options in this genre.
kmau241's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
relaxing
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
jenpaul13's review against another edition
4.0
Three widows, their children, a castle, and World War II era Germany are the bare bones comprising The Women in the Castle by Jessica Shattuck, where these women's lives unfold in new ways after the end of the war.
To read this, and other book reviews, visit my website: http://makinggoodstories.wordpress.com/.
Toward the end of World War II, there is a resistance effort to assassinate Hilter in order to prevent further atrocities, but it ultimately fails, leaving the men of the resistance dead and their widows forced to endure their demise. Marianne von Lingenfels, the wife of one of the resistors and best friend to another, had promised to protect the wives and children of the resistance. In keeping her word, Marianne returns to the castle of her ancestors and tries to bring as many broken families back together as possible, starting with that of her best friend by locating his son, Martin, and wife, Benita. As Marianne's new makeshift family develops, she and they are faced with coming to accept how the decisions they've made define them.
As a story of three women brought together by the tragedy of Hitler and war in Germany and their struggles to come to terms with their decisions during this time, the narrative dealt with heavily emotional topics without straying too far into the graphic brutality that occurred during this period. Jumping around in time to unfold the women's stories worked well to divulge information at times when it would make the most impact to the narrative and reveal the most about a particular character (and the character development throughout was fairly well done). It was interesting to read about the perspective of the women who were linked to a resistance effort in Germany during this incredibly tumultuous time, as this is not a perspective of World War II that is often read about.
To read this, and other book reviews, visit my website: http://makinggoodstories.wordpress.com/.
Toward the end of World War II, there is a resistance effort to assassinate Hilter in order to prevent further atrocities, but it ultimately fails, leaving the men of the resistance dead and their widows forced to endure their demise. Marianne von Lingenfels, the wife of one of the resistors and best friend to another, had promised to protect the wives and children of the resistance. In keeping her word, Marianne returns to the castle of her ancestors and tries to bring as many broken families back together as possible, starting with that of her best friend by locating his son, Martin, and wife, Benita. As Marianne's new makeshift family develops, she and they are faced with coming to accept how the decisions they've made define them.
As a story of three women brought together by the tragedy of Hitler and war in Germany and their struggles to come to terms with their decisions during this time, the narrative dealt with heavily emotional topics without straying too far into the graphic brutality that occurred during this period. Jumping around in time to unfold the women's stories worked well to divulge information at times when it would make the most impact to the narrative and reveal the most about a particular character (and the character development throughout was fairly well done). It was interesting to read about the perspective of the women who were linked to a resistance effort in Germany during this incredibly tumultuous time, as this is not a perspective of World War II that is often read about.
heather_raquel's review against another edition
Got halfway through. Seemed kinda slow; no distinctive plot. After reading review on Good reads, decided to call it quits. One of the main characters commits suicide.
skynet666's review against another edition
4.0
This was a WWII story that centered around three women. I always like these stories and this was interesting, but for some reason I felt like there was a lot more depth to some characters than others. I would give it 3.5 stars, but I'm rounding up.
cooperca's review against another edition
4.0
The story quickly drew me in and I wanted to know more about these women and where the story was going to take me. From Germany in the late 30s to the US in the early 90s, these women lead flawed but fascinating lives. Marianne is by far the one that takes things head on, yet Ania's quiet reflection on how her life developed (errors in judgement, lack of action, lies she told to herself and others) lead her to gain strength. Benita was the only one that never truly changed and continued to look for shortcuts her entire life.
The details in the telling of this dark part of history and how these women (and others) dealt with and equal mix of fear and rebellion was captivating. Definitely read the post notes as it adds to the overall story.
The details in the telling of this dark part of history and how these women (and others) dealt with and equal mix of fear and rebellion was captivating. Definitely read the post notes as it adds to the overall story.
kayleepopovich's review against another edition
3.0
This novel was not what I thought it was going to be. Me and my 21st century values went into it thinking that it would be an uplifting tale of a rare display of heroic feminism in one of the darkest periods in world history, and while this was partly the case, it was more of a depressing than that. Not that I expected a work of historical fiction set in WWII to be cheery and sugar-coated, but I figured it would be more a story of how these women picked up the pieces of their lives and helped the others do the same--not how they all one by one fell apart until the novel reaches its resolution, ending with a description of a character that was as irrelevant as she was a uniting principle.
It wasn't until Ania's story started to take shape that I became more engaged with the book. She was a complicated figure but an important one, probably because her story is quite similar to many others who actually lived during that time. The way she followed Hitler's rhetoric because such a vibrant and promising orator seemed like a beacon of light after the devastation of Germany post-WWI; the way it became clear to her much later on that something infinitely more sinister and deceptive was happening, despite what she was being told to believe; and the way she kept most of this hidden and acknowledges the past without actually full on facing it, except to be regretful and self-deprecating towards the end of her life. While Marianne's and Benita's stories were interesting, I felt that Ania's character was a bit of a dark horse in that she didn't seem that interesting until, all at once, she was one of the most important figures in the novel.
Marianne and Benita were obviously intended to be foils to one another, but I felt that the dynamic of this specific relationship could have been better explored. And while Benita's suicide is a fitting resolution to the estranged friendship of Benita and Marianne, I felt it uncharacteristic to Benita herself. Her defining virtue was her love for her son, Martin, and if this love had really been as unwavering as the reader was led to believe, there should have been at the very least a better explanation of this component of Benita's life before she killed herself. More accurate to her character is that this love should have been the thing that saved her and kept her from killing herself.
There is more to the novel than what I have written here, but these were the main things on my mind as a finish this story.
side note: the story was assembled in a way similar to other historical novels, where it is set in one period of time (WWII) and then jumps very far ahead into the future when life has come and nearly gone (early 1990s). I am not so much a fan of this kind of timeline. I think that works of historical fiction are more credible and better received if placed only at one point in time. While I understand that jumping the action forward and trying to relate it to contemporary society is a way for readers to relate themselves to the story, the human condition will be the same regardless of when the novel is set. We don't have to see the action unfold in the 1990s to realize that the love, loss, regret, grief, longing, morals, and values experienced by these characters during WWII will most definitely feel the same to us today as they did then. Maybe that is a short-sighted critique, but sometimes a story told in a snapshot of one period of time is most impactful.
It wasn't until Ania's story started to take shape that I became more engaged with the book. She was a complicated figure but an important one, probably because her story is quite similar to many others who actually lived during that time. The way she followed Hitler's rhetoric because such a vibrant and promising orator seemed like a beacon of light after the devastation of Germany post-WWI; the way it became clear to her much later on that something infinitely more sinister and deceptive was happening, despite what she was being told to believe; and the way she kept most of this hidden and acknowledges the past without actually full on facing it, except to be regretful and self-deprecating towards the end of her life. While Marianne's and Benita's stories were interesting, I felt that Ania's character was a bit of a dark horse in that she didn't seem that interesting until, all at once, she was one of the most important figures in the novel.
Marianne and Benita were obviously intended to be foils to one another, but I felt that the dynamic of this specific relationship could have been better explored. And while Benita's suicide is a fitting resolution to the estranged friendship of Benita and Marianne, I felt it uncharacteristic to Benita herself. Her defining virtue was her love for her son, Martin, and if this love had really been as unwavering as the reader was led to believe, there should have been at the very least a better explanation of this component of Benita's life before she killed herself. More accurate to her character is that this love should have been the thing that saved her and kept her from killing herself.
There is more to the novel than what I have written here, but these were the main things on my mind as a finish this story.
side note: the story was assembled in a way similar to other historical novels, where it is set in one period of time (WWII) and then jumps very far ahead into the future when life has come and nearly gone (early 1990s). I am not so much a fan of this kind of timeline. I think that works of historical fiction are more credible and better received if placed only at one point in time. While I understand that jumping the action forward and trying to relate it to contemporary society is a way for readers to relate themselves to the story, the human condition will be the same regardless of when the novel is set. We don't have to see the action unfold in the 1990s to realize that the love, loss, regret, grief, longing, morals, and values experienced by these characters during WWII will most definitely feel the same to us today as they did then. Maybe that is a short-sighted critique, but sometimes a story told in a snapshot of one period of time is most impactful.
aefsargent's review against another edition
5.0
Amazing book. One that will stay with me for years...Deserving of a 5+