rhi_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

laurataylor's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective slow-paced

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sorryiambooked's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

3.0

The premise of this book sounded so interesting. One, I didn’t know that there was one main person who helped create criminal forensics in both theory and practice in the US in the early twentieth century. Two, I also did not know that the use of forensics started so early. For some reason, I thought forensics started to be used by police departments in maybe the 50s. But no, it all started in the late 1920’s and early 1930s. While I did find the whole of the story interesting, there were just some personal aspects about Heinrich that I didn’t really care about. I did like that Dawson told the story through a few of the major and more famous cases that Heinrich worked on. I didn’t love Dawson as the narrator though and some parts of the story felt a little sluggish. I can see someone who loves forensics or works in the area, to enjoy this book at least slightly more than I did. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...