rotorguy64's review
5.0
Very dense, but informative introduction to Saint Thomas Aquinas. Thomism is a fascinating philosophy, very complex but still the opposite of the inconsequential navelgazing that so many philosophers like to engage in these day. In other words, it isn't [b:A Theory of Justice|129237|A Theory of Justice|John Rawls|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1348730096s/129237.jpg|1383130]. The Angelic Doctor knew better than to write a five hundred page tome based on premises that he snatched from thin air. His system of ethics is the most elegant and beautiful I have discovered since I've stumbled over [a:Rothbardianism|46810|Murray N. Rothbard|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1215371480p2/46810.jpg].
The main reason why I got this book was because I wanted to learn more about refutations of the naturalistic fallacy and the is-ought-problem. McInerny delivered both. It was a good feeling to reap the reward of years of stubborn resistance against emotivism. If such a refutation is what you're looking for, too, then look no further. You've found your book.
I'll likely reread Ethica Thomistica in a year or so, maybe even sooner. It's short, but very densely packed with information, and the subject matter is extremely complex, although rightly so.
The main reason why I got this book was because I wanted to learn more about refutations of the naturalistic fallacy and the is-ought-problem. McInerny delivered both. It was a good feeling to reap the reward of years of stubborn resistance against emotivism. If such a refutation is what you're looking for, too, then look no further. You've found your book.
I'll likely reread Ethica Thomistica in a year or so, maybe even sooner. It's short, but very densely packed with information, and the subject matter is extremely complex, although rightly so.
scottacorbin's review
4.0
An excellent intro to Thomas' moral thought. Very helpful in a climate that is often confused about morality and moral agency. Some parts were a bit esoteric and hard to follow while other parts I highlighted whole paragraphs. Not for the faint of heart but very good.
rickcummingsjr's review
4.0
While I don’t agree with some of the specific moral judgments of the author, this book helped me grasp some of the basic assumptions, beliefs, and thoughts of Thomas and Thomists. Overall very helpful.
More...