Reviews tagging 'Physical abuse'

The City of Stardust by Georgia Summers

13 reviews

taybay23's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

This book is heavy on the vibes - I read it as an audiobook and really loved it, and I think I would have struggled a bit with reading it in print. The pacing picks up and slows again in places, and as an audiobook read while on walks or crafting, it had a nice cadence. It’s a lovely standalone fantasy with a hero’s journey and an interesting world to explore. There’s a redemption arc, found family, a curse (and a debt), gruesome gods, magic Tarot, and other dimensions. If you loved the Ten Thousand Doors of January or want a grown-up Golden Compass, this will be a good time. There’s not an explosive conclusion (and there’s a loose end that never fully ties!) but it comes to a natural end of conflict and I enjoyed going along the journey with the MCs.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jasperw's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

I really enjoyed this book. I think the writing is beautiful and the story is told really well. I think plot points are interweaved together really well. I think the characters are real. There were sometimes actions that were confusing- but you had to remember who's perspective you were currently seeing and also the trauma/experiences of that specific character. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

callistag1's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alanahcw's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark hopeful mysterious sad tense

4.75

I wanted a little more from the climax/ending

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pm_me_book_recs's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

A gothic globe-trotting urban fantasy with elements of horror and mystery. 

Parts somehow both whimsical and horrifying? Think Pan's Labyrinth vibes, but also completely different. The whole book is a vibe, moody and dark and pushing for answers. Violet struggles, realistically so, after spending a life sheltered and safe. She bumbles stubbornly through her deceptions, navigating secret society, unknown magic, and a family curse on the brink of fruition. This tale is saturated with betrayal, haunted with Violet's childhood memories, but also so full of hope and determination. The world is just a key-turn away. The romance is pretty good too, right person wrong time with a dash of enemies to lovers. I can't really say more without spoilers!

I listened to this via Libro.fm and immediately looked up what other books this narrator has done- this was the first. I'm so excited to hear what projects Kitty Parker does next, her different intonations for each character were SO GOOD. Sexy evil for the big bad, brooding and cautious as Aleksander, challenging and strong willed as Violet, and the poor exasperated and exhausted brothers. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ahse1dances's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Lacked any real character development. The romance had no basis either. And the pacing felt off and made things a bit confusing.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

purplepenning's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.0

Undoubtedly beautiful prose and an interesting fantasy premise that blends a modern setting with an old world dark fairytale vibe (via portal doors). Overall, however, the story, pacing, and character development just didn't click for me. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mirificmoxie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lillylouise's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.5

The story had an interesting premise but terrible execution. I liked the fairy tale atmosphere but not much else. The story was dragging and slow. The multiple POV were distracting. The book is tagged as gothic and dark but I didn't really get that from reading. The romance between Violet and Aleksander was minimal and it didn't feel satisfactory, was forced. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

skillyillian's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

Thank you to netgalley and the publisher for an eARC of this book in exchange for my honest review.

I really wanted to love this book. The concepts are insanely cool and the author's writing style is very interesting, but beyond that, it felt like a lot of potential that was left to the wayside. The entire story feels like just a bunch of things that happen to someone, instead of a series of challenges that directly affect the FMC and push her past some kind of boundary. The logic of this story is so broken in most places that, if it weren't for the author basically going "she's necessary to this event because I said so" then the FMC's presence wouldn't have made a difference for half this story in the first place.

The story revolves around Violet Everly and the curse that haunts her family. They're given ten years to find her missing mother, who left to apparently find a way to break this curse. Eventually, the task falls to Violet, who is suddenly savvy enough to travel the world on her own despite having been homeschooled and has never left the small town she's spent her entire life in. Whatever, not a huge problem, except that
  most of the time she spends traveling is summed up in less than a page. She learns so much about the world, the scholars of the magical city from the other world, etc etc over the course of a year and it's boiled down to a few paragraphs that list some cities and that she went to some parties. it was really disappointing, i would've loved to have seen more of violet's world travels. things about the scholars are brought up later, and it's basically explained away as "she learned this while she was travelling" without any further context. it made her entire journey, that supposedly shaped who she was for the last half of the book, fall flat.


The logic in this book is my biggest complaint. Most of the major plot points, and even several smaller ones, feel like they got thrown in despite or without any prior context or consideration for what it would mean for characters, further plot, external or internal consequences, just .. anything, really. Everything felt very surface level plot without any deeper meaning or explanation, like the book was written and then someone went through and cut out almost all of the deeper context that would explain why things happened the way they did or why people made certain choices. There were a few major plot points that, had they felt like they had been genuine to the story and not just included to add drama, would have had serious emotional impact. But instead, it felt forced, and left me asking, "wait why did that just happen? if xyz just happened then how does abc even work???" multiple times.

One of the other things that disappointed me was the magic system. it could've been so cool, but beyond "this is a special material and only special people can manipulate it" there was almost no other explanation, or other use of it, period. violet is described as having this insane talent that should make her crazy powerful, but at the end of the day, she uses it once time to find out that something is magic, and that's it. that's literally it. the whole build up of all of her talent and she does not even touch it. why???

the ending was a let down, in all honesty it made violet's entire journey feel completely pointless and like she didn't even need to be involved in the first place.
violet's blood is needed to open a millennia-old door because she's an everly. but penelope has been harvesting everlys for centuries, soooo. why not use one of them? and the entire everly lineage exists because ever and penelope's daughter somehow escaped penelope's slaughter of the entire city. soooo either neither of them knew where she was and she was lucky enough to hide from her mom, she had already run away or been taken away, or penelope saved her? but if so then why didn't penelope explain it. and she couldn't have run away anyway. the child would've been less than a year old. so why was penelope hunting everlys to get back to elandriel if she saved her daughter? her daughter was an everly. why not use her daughter on the door. someone please explain. i don't get it. i genuinely hope i'm missing something because there were things like this all throughout the book.


There were also multiple POVs, which i usually love, but they would switch in the middle of chapters without any prior warning whatsoever, you'd just be reading from violet's pov and the next paragraph is somewhere else entirely, and from aleksander's pov.

This book is described as romance, but there was almost no romance other than a very sudden dedication between Violet and Aleksander that felt like it came out of nowhere. In the same way Violet's travels are skipped over, so too was the romance. The scenes where they were supposed to be falling in love were just "they spent hours together talking" with almost no real dialogue or even really what they talked about besides "he told her some stuff about where he came from" and that was pretty much it. The romance felt like it was just there so that Violet and Aleksander were willing to die for each other by the end of the book, instead of them genuinely caring about each other and being in love. It was all the dedication with none of the romance. You'd die for your dog the same way those two would die for each other.

One last note, there's a very dark event that happens towards the end of the book that, to me, just felt like it was thrown in to try to escalate the situation, and not because it made sense for the story. Fuel for the fire instead of what actually fit, so it felt gratuitous. TW // child death
penelope goes insane and slaughters the entire scholar tower, including the children. violet and aleksander find adult bodies at the door of the tower, go up and up, and eventually find the bodies of the children. the adult bodies would continue going up the stairs, but instead, violet and aleksander turn around and start heading towards the lowest basement of the tower, finding a room that was specifically stated as "penelope murdered anyone that knew about this until it was forgotten and no one knows this exists". did they only go up the stairs to find the kids, receive their designated trauma and motivation, and then go "welp anyway on to where we know she really went" despite penelope's quarters being above the children's floor? why would they ignore her rooms entirely, when they don't know where she is, and go somewhere else, let alone somewhere they had no way of knowing even existed? and then violet just stares at the fancy everly-blood-only door before KMSing. and then she just??? lives??? and it's literally never explained how ever saved her life and brought her back from being DEAD. it gets skipped over entirely. why? how? what?????? we're just gonna move on from "you were dead and he brought you back"???? ok sure. i guess.


Overall, there's a ton of potential in this book, but I wish someone had gone over the logic with a fine toothed comb before calling it a day. A lot of things happened without any further context and it felt like they were added for momentary drama before moving on and glazing over it entirely. Characters were brought in, only to be disappeared and suddenly no longer in the story at all as soon as the convenience of their threat ended. It's like they never existed. I ended up questioning more than half the events of the story and felt very passive about the rest of it. I know several others really liked it so maybe this just wasn't for me, but I couldn't get past all of the glaring flaws in the logic. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings