Reviews with content warning for Terminal illness - Carmilla

Reviews tagging 'Terminal illness'

Carmilla by J. Sheridan Le Fanu

14 reviews

savvyrosereads's review against another edition

dark emotional mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

This is a classic vampire story and an absolute delight, and the audio production was so well done and atmospheric. A great spooky season read!

Content Warnings

maregred's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Content Warnings

el219's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.25

grrrrrr i have so many mixed feelings abt this,, was definitely way too short; lacked details that help you connect with the characters & even details that explained important plot points. was also hard to follow at times since each scene was about 5 pages long,, yet despite the simple storytelling, it was strangely atmospheric and alluring. everything felt very murky but that’s kind of the point. i’m just disappointed at how much better this could have been :( i needed more scenes between laura & carmilla to show their “unconventional” and sometimes toxic relationship; i needed more creepy outbursts and declarations of love. i wanted to know about laura feeling conflicted about carmilla in depth; not knowing whether she should love or hate her, etc. i did love this, but it’s “wasted” potential makes me love it a little less

Content Warnings

danimacuk's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.25

Content Warnings

littleflowerfairy's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Content Warnings

saraaaa's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced

Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

I have mixed feelings about this book. It's tense, it's gothic, it's the first work of fiction revolving around vampires, it's homoerotic. It has some beautiful images and descriptions, especially when it comes to the relationship between Carmilla and Laura. Overall, I'd say it's a story worth reading.
I think its main problem is that it didn't fit the novella format that well. Everything felt rushed, especially the ending chapters, as if Le Fanu was running out of ink. By the end, the line between the protagonist-narrator and the author blurred every few paragraphs rather noticeably. Had it been a novel, there could've been enough room for both of them, without the technical information taking up precious space from the plot, that could've been better developed. Many plot points were left unexplored in their potential, some were just plainly ignored –

Who was the older lady who accompanied Mircalla to meet her victims? Another vampire who just passed by from time to time to help spread their species? Was the voice of Laura's mother a mere hallucination, or did she really somehow comunicate with her daughter to save her? Was the fact that she was a blood relative to the Karnstein family relevant?

At the same time, almost paradoxically, the prose was so complex, the periods so long and full of subordinate clauses, that I found the pace rather slow.

Content Warnings

ggcd1981's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

Carmilla: A Vampyre Tale foi inspiração para Dracula de Bram Stoker. Assim que soube disso adicionei a novela a minha lista de leitura. Após a leitura da obra é possível ver a influência, um exemplo disso é o fato de Carmilla predar jovens mulheres, dando mais atenção a “corte” ou talvez seja melhor dizer “caça” de jovens de posição social mais elevada. A vampira ainda vive em castelos e se movimenta entre círculo sociais elevados e tem aversão a símbolos religiosos. Dos personagens da obra o único que realmente se destaca é a personagem titular, Carmilla, também conhecida como Mircalla e Millarca, ela é a antagonista homônima da história. Uma vampira de uma velha família aristocrática, ela aparece eternamente como uma bela jovem e ataca jovens vulneráveis por quem parece sexualmente atraída. Carmilla usa sua beleza e juventude para enganar as pessoas ao seu redor, assim muitas vezes as pessoas não conseguem ver sua verdadeira natureza até ser tarde demais. Outra personagem que merece uma menção é Laura, a protagonista e narradora do livro, que reconta já adulta suas experiências de adolescente quando foi alvo de Carmilla. Laura fica animada quando Carmilla - uma garota de sua idade - vem para ficar com sua família, mas ela logo se sente atraída e repelida por sua nova amiga. Após repetidos sonhos de visitas noturnas, Laura começa a adoecer, e uma visita do amigo de seu pai, General Spielsdorf, quem havia perdido uma sobrinha para a mesma predadora, revela que a fonte da doença são as mordidas de Carmilla que, segundo ele, é uma vampira de uma família aristocrática extinta. A atmosfera do livro é excelentemente gótica vitoriana e dá o clima que vemos influenciar obras como Dracula: castelos, cemitérios, camponeses assombrados por um mal que não compreendem completamente. A escrita fez um excelente trabalho construindo o cenário, criando o clima e desenvolvendo uma antagonista inesperada para uma obra publicada em 1872. Considerado o primeiro thriller de vampiros o enredo desta novela trata de inocência se tornando o alvo de um mal antigo. A virtuosa Laura cresceu em um castelo solitário e anseia por uma amiga próxima. Seu desejo parece concedido com a chegada de uma bela e misteriosa estranha chamada Carmilla. Uma amizade se desenvolve, mas o humor taciturno e as conotações sexuais da visitante comprometem a felicidade de Laura. Será possível a Laura escapar dos avanços de Carmilla com vida e espírito intactos? Essa obra tem, com certeza, um enredo intrigante e não é à toa que exerceu influência em obras subsequentes de vampiros. A lógica interna da narrativa funciona, pelo menos tem sentido de acordo com o meu conhecimento prévio da tradição de vampiros. Tradição esta que imagino esta história contribuiu para estabelecer. Carmilla: A Vampyre Tale me entreteve e me deu outra dose da atmosfera gótica que tanto gosto. Claro que devido a novela ser curta não teve um aprofundamento que permitiu me apegar aos personagens. Além disso ainda houve a narração de Megan Follows que não realmente diferenciou as vozes dos personagens tornando em algumas partes o dialogo confuso no audiobook. No entanto, ao fim, minha experiência foi em maior parte positiva, dou 4 estrelas.

Content Warnings

alexisgarcia's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

i really enjoyed this! the concept and plot were amazing, the characters were so interesting, and the writing was accessible. i wish the the characters were more flushed out and the plot was explored in more length. overall, it was a fun sapphic vampire story which was the precursor to Dracula!

Content Warnings

vigil's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

there wasn't any portion of this book that disliked reading, though i have mild hang up about the ending. the pacing of this book is consistent, though depending on the angle you view it from, could be seen as slow, medium, or fast, depending on what you count as plot progression. The language is very accessible considering it's a classic, but not simplistic or dull. i think the dialogue, especially between carmilla and laura, is the standout.

the plot began to trail off upon the introduction of the general, though the answers to the mysteries throughout the book were fully delivered (a bit too fully, you could say) in a very sussinct manner that, once finished, quickly pushed you towards the climax.

the ending was, in my opinion somewhat anti-climatic, but i understand that was the style of the time. i do think that in making carmilla more of a vague outline of a monster, rather than something present, both added and detracted from the climax, which really need more of her actually in it.

i really found carmen maria machado's introduction to be informative as well as her footnotes, though they often leaned towards comedy.

she's totally right on one front however. there's no way that wasn't an orgasm.

i had a fun time with this book though i think if it were longer, it would've made the book much better. especially the climax.

Content Warnings

maeverose's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix

4.25

I guess I’m eating my words about not liking the writing style of classics, huh?

I loved the writing style of this book. It was atmospheric and gothic, I loved the setting of the castle and the grassy hills and the ruins of the old town. I just pictured fog over everything anytime they were outside. Now I just wanna have a picnic at old castle ruins in the fog with a pretty vampire. (Sadly that doesn’t happen in this book but it could’ve). This might be my favorite classic I’ve read so far… it’s at least tied with Dracula, but I think it tops it. It actually got pretty creepy at times.

Was also a little surprised how explicitly sapphic it was, given when it was written. I was expecting it to just be homoerotic in the way that classics sometimes are, or overtly homophobic. I think it’s safe to assume that the combination of sapphic elements and vampirism was very intentional.. automatically villainizing lesbianism by portraying it as a ‘virus’ that you can ‘catch’, something that’s evil and scary… But reading it it isn’t actually explicitly homophobic. It’s all subtext. It could easily be read through a more modern lens, removing that subtext.

My only complaints:

•The racism. It’s only in one or two scenes, but it’s pretty bad in one scene especially.

•How naive Laura was, especially at the very end. She was supposed to be 19, right? How did she not connect the dots after the general’s story??? 😆

•It ended a bit abruptly, I felt.

•And lastly, I just wish we got more pretty atmospheric descriptions of the ruins. I was waiting the whole book for them to go there and when they did we didn’t get much :/ I would’ve liked more atmospheric descriptions in general, but at least we got some.

Overall, I’m really happy I liked this! I was starting to worry that classics just weren’t for me. Hopefully there are still more out there that I’ll love.

Content Warnings

More...