Reviews

The Valley of Fear by Arthur Conan Doyle

humatariq's review

Go to review page

4.0

This one had quite an intriguing name, but perhaps one of the last ones that I read. Don't remember much about this one except that it wasn't quite of the same pedigree as [b:The Hound of the Baskervilles|8921|The Hound of the Baskervilles (Sherlock Holmes, #5)|Arthur Conan Doyle|https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1355929358s/8921.jpg|3311984].

rashthedoctor's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.75

This was a typical Holmes book, and ideally I think this was supposed to be book number 3 or 4 , before the final battle with Dr Moriarty .

WHAT I LIKED :

The first few chapters exclusively depicted the talents of Holmes , starting with him deciphering a letter without cipher and things just went on to become more interesting with the way Holmes treated the various mysteries .

One of my biggest plus for this book is the fact that Holmes negative characteristics attributes were hidden in this book , we never witnessed him indulging in drugs or trying to appear as an arrogant know-it-all .

WHAT I DIDNT LIKE :

While the set up for the plot was splendid , the mystery was east to decipher and it became a predictable affair .

Also , just like in a study in scarlet we had to read a part 2 where the accused narrated his ordeal prior to the actual event of the book . This was a dull read , predictable and honestly made me lack any excitement .

CONCLUSION: 

This was one of the better books in the Holmes series , showcasing everything that's good with the lead character as well as showing a good mystery for readers to unravel

alreadyemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Hands down the Sherlock Holmes I've enjoyed the most.

smunro's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

ssickmorgan's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

naomi_e_'s review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

laurathompson's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

emily_gaynier's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

More like a 3.5

I'm more of a fan of the Sherlock Holmes short stories

A few very solid twists though

angevba's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4.5
Nuevamente me encuentro frente a otra gran obra de Arthur Conan Doyle. Definitivamente se nota la mejora en la narrativa del autor en esta novela, y es algo que en lo personal aprecio muchísimo.
Sherlock Holmes definitivamente siempre cumple, y asegura tener una lectura entretenida y emocionante.
La primera parte de este libro fue, en mi opinión, muy bien ejecutada, sorprendiendome de inicio a fin. Sin embargo, la segunda parte se me hizo bastante lenta (lo cual creo que es obvio, debido a que ya se resolvió la principal parte de la trama), pienso que pudo haber sido mucho más corta y concisa.

En general disfruto cada libro de Sherlock Holmes más que el anterior, MUY RECOMENDADOS.

introverted_unicorn's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

I don’t like to read about gang related stuff