Scan barcode
not_another_ana's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.75
"That's the problem with summoning demons, you see. Sooner or later somebody else raises them against you"
Batavia, 1634. Samuel Pipps, the greatest detective in the world, is on his way to his execution in Amsterdam. His crime? Unknown, even to him and his closest friend and companion Arent Hayes. As if that weren't enough, while boarding the ship the passengers and crew receive a warning from a leper and witness a horrifying death. Soon, while sailing on the Saardam, strange voices plague the ship and shocking events confuse and scare everyone on board. Could this be the work of a demon just like they were warned on shore? Or is something more human afoot? With Sammy Pipps out of comission, and trapped in a dark cell, only Arent might be able to save the ship, but is he up to the task or will the dark waters take them all?
This was such a ride. I started this book filled with optimism as I love a good mystery and this had all the initial makings of one. A closed room, well ship, murder with a may or may not be supernatural twist. Add to that an interesting subversion on the classic detective story, by taking out the genius investigator out of the equation, and I was sold. Good writing (if a bit too descriptive), short exciting chapters, well constructed characters, lot of questions, this was shaping up to be a 4 stars. Until the crime was solved in the most ludicrous, senseless way. After everything that I read the solution to the mystery was something out of an episode of Scooby-Doo
I am genuinely so disappointed and upset by this book, I feel quite cheated. When reading a crime novel I enjoy trying to solve the puzzle. I take notes, check the evidence, come up with theories, etc. This is why if I get to the end of a book and find out that there was no way to solve it because the author was lying or pulling stuff out of nowhere I feel quite tricked and deceived. The road might have been enjoyable but if the destination is a sham? That will make me flip my opinion immediately. And this book didn't even have the guts to just go for it, the conclusion committed the crime of not only being impossible to reach as a reader, but also being lame.
Rant incoming:
And who were the masterminds behind this? Well, Sammy and Creesjie, obviously π I think that making Sammy the criminal would have been so different and interesting, but you have to make it work. Their plans relayed too much on chance and very clearly went wrong. This solution left me with too many questions and the answers 1) don't exist or 2) are unconvincing. Plus the way this was revealed was all tell and zero show. Just pages and pages of dull and senseless explanations.
Oh and the reactions from the other characters!! Sara and Arent were both very upstanding and moral characters, even to the point of going against the expected beliefs of the time period. The murders on the ship and all the violence inflicted on the people really affected them and pushed them to find the guilty party. And yet they're cool with their besties being liars and murderers. Sammy and Creesjie's attitude to the whole debacle is dismissive and that it was ok because they just killed bad people, never mind everyone caught in the crossfire. Arent has been haunted the whole book by a mistake he made that almost sent an innocent man to his death only for Sammy to reveal that no, Arent was actually right all along. If that were my so called best friend who I defended with my life I would throw his lying ass out of that ship SO FAST. But it's fine cause they're all going to make it right somehow and be good? We'll never know cause this isn't a series π€·πΌββοΈ
BOO TOMATO TOMATO π π
Graphic: Animal death, Misogyny, Violence, and Blood
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Gaslighting, Colonisation, and Classism
Minor: Pregnancy
mentions of rape but nothing happensreadingtotravel's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Infidelity, Violence, Blood, and Murder
Minor: Child death and Death of parent
juriartt's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, and Blood
Minor: Rape
voldycat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Confinement, and Violence
Moderate: Alcoholism, Rape, Sexism, Medical content, and War
Minor: Sexual content
rkpaulson96's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal death, Confinement, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Genocide, Misogyny, Rape, Sexism, Sexual content, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Murder, Pregnancy, Alcohol, Colonisation, War, and Injury/Injury detail
wild_rabbits's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Domestic abuse, Physical abuse, Rape, Violence, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Racism, Sexism, Blood, and Grief
achubb's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
I especially enjoyed the grey area of morality throughout. Each person viewed the situations in a unique way that helped bring the story to life.
The ending was not as satisfying as I hoped. It's wrapped up a little too nicely in the last few pages.
I enjoyed the questions I was left with. How many cases did Sammy fake the culprit of? Was he the true murderer for some of his cases considering his history? I wish this was explored/hinted at more
Graphic: Violence and Blood
Moderate: Animal death and Vomit
Minor: Rape
jerseynoonatic's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Bullying, Confinement, Death, Domestic abuse, Genocide, Gore, Infidelity, Sexual content, Torture, Violence, Blood, Murder, and Fire/Fire injury
sandysmith's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Rape, Violence, Blood, Excrement, and Vomit
Moderate: Animal death and War
cmbohn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Violence and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Gun violence, Infidelity, Sexual content, Torture, Religious bigotry, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Sexual violence, Death of parent, Pregnancy, and War