Reviews with content warning for Kidnapping - The Big Four

This is my least favorite of the Poirot novels yet. I had two main issues with it: First, the casual racism of the era is taken to the extreme in this one, and I greatly disliked the characterization of so many characters as a result. Second, apparently this was originally a set of short stories with a connected theme/enemy, and the flow of the story is lacking as a result. It felt broken up in odd ways as a result of its origin as short stories.

Content Warnings

balth_the_chaotic_good's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

this is a love story. to me

Content Warnings

poirot's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

Content Warnings

gillian_aftanas's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.75

Content Warnings

oliii_24's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging lighthearted mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Content Warnings

hannahcstocks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

Content Warnings

ameydireads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No

4.25

"It is a duel to the death, mon ami. You and I on the one side, the Big Four on the other."

After being reunited with Hastings, Poirot goes up against the toughest enemies he has faced till now. Every time it seems like he’s one step ahead of them, the Big Four proves him wrong. But Poirot doesn’t give up easily! I liked that this mystery wasn't easy to solve. Poirot really had to give his all and put his little grey cells to work.

The structure of the story was different compared to the other Poirot stories. Whilst the focus mainly lies on the Big Four, Poirot has many side investigations which all in turn seem to be connected to the Big Four.

I liked that there were references to Poirot’s previous cases. Poirot and Hastings have inside jokes about Inspector Giraud, the human foxhound, who appears in ‘Murder on the Links’, and Hastings’ soft spot for girls with auburn-coloured hair. This became evident when he proposed to Cynthia in ‘The Mysterious Affair at Styles’.

Also, there were many similarities with Sherlock Holmes! The Big Four reminded me of the criminal mastermind Moriarty.

During his struggle with Moriarty, Watson believed Holmes was dead and that is exactly how it went down with Hastings and Poirot in this story. Poirot additionally mentions that he has a brother who is as smart as Poirot and maybe even smarter if he wasn’t lazy. We eventually find out that Poirot made this up to confuse the Big Four, but still it is very similar to Holmes’ brother, Mycroft.

There were some parts that I didn’t like that much. First of all, it bothered me that an Asian character was referred to as ‘Chink’ and secondly, Hastings’ comment about women in science.

“It has always seemed to me extraordinary that a woman should go so far in the scientific world. I should have thought a purely masculine brain was needed for such work.”

But it didn’t bother me too much. The story is nearly 100 years old and it is not entirely fair to judge it by today’s standards.

Content Warnings

strangeeigenfunction's review against another edition

Go to review page

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated

1.0

Picked this one up mostly because it was the earliest Poirot that was immediately available at my library.

It is not badly written stylistically per se, and the audiobook was pleasantly performed, but the plot is both somewhat ridiculous and painfully saturated in interwar bigotry—orientalist and while not perhaps overtly antisemetic, redolent of the sort of conspiracy theories that are trotted out as motivation for antisemitism. (There's also the typical period subtle pseudoscientic judgment of people's looks that's probably in most of Christie's works but I've recently gotten better at picking up on.)

It seems to me that Christie was trying to create Poirot's Moriarty, but her creation strains credulity and even suspension of disbelief far beyond ACD's London/Britain criminal mastermind (who after all was created in a single short story as a sort of death ex machina when ACD tired of writing his beloved-by-the-public creation). My first major inkling of how dreadful this would be is when "Number One", some mysterious Chinese mastermind, gets blamed early on for ...Lenin and Trotsky. And we're never given much hint beyond that of the motivation of this international criminal syndicate, or even much of what they intend to do beyond contrived petty silencing murders seemingly directed at Poirot himself. They're something like Bond villains, but that is at odds with their Moriarty-nature and just doesn't work well in the context of a Poirot book. Further, Poirot-as-foil for them smacks of paranoid delusion. (I'm also not fond of how the book treats the woman scientist it posits, almost in the fashion of those Star Trek historical trio citations (eg Newton, Einstein, Cochrane), as the sucessor and superior to Marie Sklodowska Curie.)

I think even if Christie had contrived to use much of the plot without the bigotry (it might have helped to do without the orientalism, and even improved plausibility if Number One was say, a fellow Belgian with a grudge against Poirot. Moriarty works, inasmuch as he does, largely because his scope and motivation mirror/foil Holmes. That is far from true of the Big Four relative to Poirot.) it still wouldn't be a very good plot despite some fun points, but the egregious period bigotry makes this hard to recommend to anyone. I'd especially advise against it for younger readers who might absorb the bigotry (or even the conspiracy sort of paranoia) unless they are coached through reading it critically.

Incidentally, I had a little trouble at first sorting out whether some characters were fictional or just obscure, which complicated my sense of how true-to-life this is meant to be. A lot of mysteries, Christie or otherwise, feel realistic except for certain contrivances of detective fiction, but The Big Four is unrealistic in far more aspects than this without necessarily being obvious about it.

The good: some of little murder plots could have been fun in Holmes length short stories; ...I guess the aptitude granted the female scientist character is nice to see in a way, though maybe it's a backhanded compliment considering... (and there is sexism expressed about her)
The bad: practically everything else about the book is either bigoted, implausible, or both.

Content Warnings

More...