Scan barcode
kevin_shepherd's review
5.0
“Conservatives are out here acting like the Constitution was etched by divine flame upon stone tablets, when in reality it was scrawled out over a sweaty summer by people making deals with actual monsters who were trying to protect their rights to rape the humans they held in bondage.” -Elie Mystal, 2022
One of the things that sets Mr. Mystal apart from other political commentators I’ve read recently is that he is legitimately further left than I am—which is rare. He gives me something to aspire to.
“The (U.S.) Constitution is not gospel, it’s not magic, and it’s not even particularly successful if you count one civil war, one massive minority uprising for justice . . . and one failed coup led by the actual president, as demerits.”
There, I’ve quoted this glorious bastard twice already and I am just barely up to page two of the goddamn introduction.
Separate but Unequal
Mystal acknowledges that the basic concepts of the constitution—the rights, rules and prohibitions—are fairly sound, but the designed intent and application of those concepts falls far, far short of anything remotely equitable and unbiased.
1st Amendment/Freedom of Speech
The next time you hear a conservative rail against “cancel culture,” feel free to name drop Desiree Fairooz, Juli Briskman, and/or Gawker.com. There is no quicker path to cancellation than chuckling during a conservative’s confirmation hearing (Fairooz), giving the middle finger to a conservative’s motorcade (Briskman), or hurting a billionaire conservative’s fragile feelings (Gawker.com). Make no mistake, when it comes to cancel culture there is no boundary to republican hypocrisy.
Ammosexuals and the Second Amendment
“[Republicans] are willing to suffer the ongoing national tragedies of mass shootings, they’re willing to ignore the epidemics of suicides and violence against women, they’re willing to sacrifice the lives of schoolchildren, all so that they might feel a little less afraid when something goes bump in the night. We live in the most violent industrialized nation on earth because too many dudes can’t admit they still need a night-light.”
Elie contends that the current conservative interpretation of the second amendment was birthed in the 1970s by the National Rifle Association at the behest of gun manufacturers. Before then (e.g. The 1960’s) gun control was actually a plank in the republican platform. In fact, the “Mulford Act” (1967), one of California’s toughest gun control laws at the time, was signed into law by then governor Ronald Reagan. Yep. Ronald. Freakin’. Reagan.
You see, in the 1960’s, when Black people started carrying guns (i.e. The Black Panther Party and Copwatching), republicans read the second amendment as:
“a WELL REGULATED militia…”
Then, in the 1970’s when the NRA became the mouthpiece for corporations and funneled millions of dollars into GOP campaign coffers, the Orwellian newspeak became:
“A mumble mumble mumble MILITIA…”
See how that works?
Stop & Frisk
“Despite what you may have heard on Fox News, being Black is not a constitutionally valid reason to suspect a person of a crime.”
This Is Me (reluctantly) Moving On…
As much as I enjoyed this book, at some point (e.g. now) I need to shut the hell up and pick up that next read. I’ve already rambled on for over six hundred words and I haven’t yet commented on police unions or Hobby Lobby or gerrymandering or jury trials or water boarding or mass incarceration or the Fifteenth Amendment or Loving v. Virginia, etc. etc. etc. Read this and then we’ll talk.
One of the things that sets Mr. Mystal apart from other political commentators I’ve read recently is that he is legitimately further left than I am—which is rare. He gives me something to aspire to.
“The (U.S.) Constitution is not gospel, it’s not magic, and it’s not even particularly successful if you count one civil war, one massive minority uprising for justice . . . and one failed coup led by the actual president, as demerits.”
There, I’ve quoted this glorious bastard twice already and I am just barely up to page two of the goddamn introduction.
Separate but Unequal
Mystal acknowledges that the basic concepts of the constitution—the rights, rules and prohibitions—are fairly sound, but the designed intent and application of those concepts falls far, far short of anything remotely equitable and unbiased.
1st Amendment/Freedom of Speech
The next time you hear a conservative rail against “cancel culture,” feel free to name drop Desiree Fairooz, Juli Briskman, and/or Gawker.com. There is no quicker path to cancellation than chuckling during a conservative’s confirmation hearing (Fairooz), giving the middle finger to a conservative’s motorcade (Briskman), or hurting a billionaire conservative’s fragile feelings (Gawker.com). Make no mistake, when it comes to cancel culture there is no boundary to republican hypocrisy.
Ammosexuals and the Second Amendment
“[Republicans] are willing to suffer the ongoing national tragedies of mass shootings, they’re willing to ignore the epidemics of suicides and violence against women, they’re willing to sacrifice the lives of schoolchildren, all so that they might feel a little less afraid when something goes bump in the night. We live in the most violent industrialized nation on earth because too many dudes can’t admit they still need a night-light.”
Elie contends that the current conservative interpretation of the second amendment was birthed in the 1970s by the National Rifle Association at the behest of gun manufacturers. Before then (e.g. The 1960’s) gun control was actually a plank in the republican platform. In fact, the “Mulford Act” (1967), one of California’s toughest gun control laws at the time, was signed into law by then governor Ronald Reagan. Yep. Ronald. Freakin’. Reagan.
You see, in the 1960’s, when Black people started carrying guns (i.e. The Black Panther Party and Copwatching), republicans read the second amendment as:
“a WELL REGULATED militia…”
Then, in the 1970’s when the NRA became the mouthpiece for corporations and funneled millions of dollars into GOP campaign coffers, the Orwellian newspeak became:
“A mumble mumble mumble MILITIA…”
See how that works?
Stop & Frisk
“Despite what you may have heard on Fox News, being Black is not a constitutionally valid reason to suspect a person of a crime.”
This Is Me (reluctantly) Moving On…
As much as I enjoyed this book, at some point (e.g. now) I need to shut the hell up and pick up that next read. I’ve already rambled on for over six hundred words and I haven’t yet commented on police unions or Hobby Lobby or gerrymandering or jury trials or water boarding or mass incarceration or the Fifteenth Amendment or Loving v. Virginia, etc. etc. etc. Read this and then we’ll talk.
snazzaro's review against another edition
informative
fast-paced
5.0
Incredible pulls-no-punches takedown of conservative interpretations of the constitution.
seeaudreyread's review against another edition
challenging
funny
hopeful
informative
reflective
fast-paced
4.5
txa1265's review
5.0
Think about how and what you learned about the constitution as far back as you can recall: that it is the foundation of our country? That it is why ‘we are the freest nation in history’? That it is a living document that can be amended to reflect changes in the world?
Probably not that it was assembled by white supremacist slave-owning misogynist men who didn’t think that black people were equally human to whites, who thought of women as property, and who wanted to ensure that their vision of government wasn’t infected by the will of the general population, right?
But that is reality - American is a nation founded on genocide and extreme racism by people not opposed to royalty but just to hereditary monarchy from across an ocean. And that means that the best we could ever do is moderate the extremist white male supremacy that infests every legal document from the first 150 years of our country.
This book gets at the nitty gritty of what is wrong and why - and what can & can’t be done about it. It is not easy to hear - but it is essential that we all listen. If you are frustrated with our country and don’t believe that MLK’s “arc of history curves towards justice” will survive the fascism movement represented by the SCOTUS, federalist society, ‘moms for liberty’, and other extremist terror organizations … then you NEED to read this. We CAN save the country, but not the way things are currently done.
Probably not that it was assembled by white supremacist slave-owning misogynist men who didn’t think that black people were equally human to whites, who thought of women as property, and who wanted to ensure that their vision of government wasn’t infected by the will of the general population, right?
But that is reality - American is a nation founded on genocide and extreme racism by people not opposed to royalty but just to hereditary monarchy from across an ocean. And that means that the best we could ever do is moderate the extremist white male supremacy that infests every legal document from the first 150 years of our country.
This book gets at the nitty gritty of what is wrong and why - and what can & can’t be done about it. It is not easy to hear - but it is essential that we all listen. If you are frustrated with our country and don’t believe that MLK’s “arc of history curves towards justice” will survive the fascism movement represented by the SCOTUS, federalist society, ‘moms for liberty’, and other extremist terror organizations … then you NEED to read this. We CAN save the country, but not the way things are currently done.
3y3z0ny0u's review against another edition
challenging
informative
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
5.0
I really enjoyed this book. I listened to the audiobook narrated by the author and it was so cool to hear the emphasis on his own voice and own words. Great content, I wish I would have studied this in my college classes!