Reviews

The Cruise of the Snark by Jack London

juliana_aldous's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This is Jack London's account of building and then sailing a 43 foot boat from California to Hawaii and the South Seas. Some interesting stories--and a lot about tropical diseases.

luizasam's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny informative

3.0

paul_cornelius's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I actually finished with Martin Johnson's book, Through the South Seas with Jack London, about the same voyage, before reading London's The Cruise of the Snark. And it's interesting to contrast the two. Of course, London's is the more literary of the two, although Johnson has a somewhat gifted, albeit exaggerated, style of his own. But the odd thing is that if you want a detailed, even more accurate description of the Snark as it sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii and then on to other South Seas locations, then Johnson's is the better book.

Yet London's book is the more memorable. His imagery, his ability to capture the moment, and his skill at stepping outside himself make for a more psychologically complete picture. That is not to say it doesn't have its more disappointing parts. The long discussion on the physics of waves and the chapter devoted to learning navigation are tedious--although they give insight into how London's mind works and his doggedness in pursuing and solving problems. A similar chapter on London's acquisition of certain medical skills, on the other hand, is humorous and reads through at a snap.

And that brings us to the tone of The Cruise of the Snark, which often is, well, snarky. London says he christened his vessel the Snark because he was inspired by Lewis Carroll's imaginary animal that provided an elusive goal. That did prove the case, here, as London was unable to complete his trip due to serious illness among all the crew. But London is well and truly snarky, in the informal sense of the word, throughout. I'm not sure when the word gained its current usage, but London mocks himself, his crew, his wife, many of the people he encounters, as well as his boat. Especially his boat, because, as it turns out, the Snark was a lemon. Just about everything that could go wrong, did go wrong with it. All the promises made in construction turned out to be lies or pipe dreams, and London paid far above and beyond anything resembling a fair price in the purchase. And never does a man skewer himself with such snarkiness for his naivete than does London.

There are also some dreamlike moments, the greatest of which comes when the Snark visits the valley of Typee on Nuku Hiva in the Marquesas, where Herman Melville's novel and real life experiences took place and from which subsequent readers became so enamored of the South Seas. Melville was there in 1842. London arrived sixty-five years later, just in time to see the very last remnants of the world Melville found disappearing into a sort of twilight memory among the very few survivors of the Typee. It is probably the strongest chapter in the book.

Don't let the tone of the book deceive you, however. This was a dangerous journey. The Americans, Japanese, and Tahitians who undertook it with London were from a generation used to privation and difficulties. They were different. They could set sail in a small ketch and cross the Pacific without detailed knowledge of the means to achieve their goals. They could do so even learning navigation while on the job so to speak. The journey of the Snark was a brave adventure. Don't mistake it for an early twentieth century version of today's fake TV survival/adventure shows. It isn't. It was the real thing.

jeremyanderberg's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

There are a handful of brilliant chapters, but also quite a few that meander. It’s a short read though, so worth it, in my opinion, if you’re into Jack London’s style and earnest appreciation for adventure and seafaring.

dtlamb's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny informative lighthearted medium-paced

4.5

lucapetruzzelli's review against another edition

Go to review page

inspiring relaxing medium-paced

2.5

psteve's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

London's story of his attempt to sail around the world on a largely self-built yacht, the Snark. It was pretty much a failure of a trip, with problems starting even before they set sail from San Francisco. The yacht cost much more than London had figured, and the departure was delayed, in part, by liens put on the boat by his creditors. His preparations were given lots of attention in the press -- he was the world's bestselling author at the time -- and he spends a lot of pages quoting from letters he received from those who wanted to accompany him.

Problems stared right away: the gasoline engine never worked. Lots of food was spoiled (some by gasoline leaking from its storage), the boat leaked, and London didn't know anything about navigation. They made it to Hawaii, where the boat needed lots of repairs, but that gave London time to learn to surf, and he wrote a long chapter in the book about it. Next was the leg south to the Marquesas, and along the way they almost ran out of water and almost overshot the islands. After that, on to the Solomons and then London went to Australia. In the Solomons London and company were best by Yaws, a painful skin infection, and due to mysterious swelling in his hands, London had to return to California.

It's a strange book, and London doesn't tell lots of the story you would expect him to. We learn very little about the personalities of his shipmates and his wife. The disquisition on surfing and especially navigation are interesting, and his visit to Typee is well handled. London is also fairly reticent about his own emotions during the trip. Descriptions of the residents of the various islands are more perfunctory than I had expected. Another standout chapter is the one on the 'pigeon' or 'beche de mer' language used in Polynesia; I'd bet the linguistics is pretty faulty, the telling is great.
More...