Reviews with content warning for Sexual content - House of Leaves

Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski

159 reviews

sullyfunn's review against another edition

Go to review page

tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

galaxy_cat's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

I was planning on writing a whole essay about all the messages, about the confusion and dread this piece of work causes to anyone who is capable of actually finishing it. About its ability to infiltrate your brain and leave a permanent mark, just like JT describes in the introduction.

But then I realised that maybe it's just a house of leaves.

Content Warnings

storm_37's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

House.

5/5

Content Warnings

missmagpie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

House of Leaves is one of my favorite books of all time, though it's certainly not for everyone. It's a dense, oftentimes frustratingly difficult, read. The two times I've read it, I made a habit of keeping my laptop close to periodically look up allusions or translations or even other people's interpretations to fully grasp what I was reading. But that is also the thing that's so great about it - every time I think about it, read it, or scroll through discussion boards of other people's takes, I get something new from it. It also plays so effectively with form - pushing the boundaries in such a wonderfully post-modern way of what a book IS. What fiction can be. And how typography affects how you read. When asked, I say it's a story within a story within a story; a man finds his neighbor's unfinished manuscript analyzing a documentary about a house that is impossibly bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. And so it is three stories: the tale of the house, the interpretation of the documentary, and the story of the man reading it. But really it's a story about fact and fiction, questioning what is real and what isn't, and questioning the mediums we inherently accept as factual, such as academic papers and documentaries. Most people won't love this book. It takes work to read. It's filled with the rambling commentary of the most annoying character in the world (to enjoy the Navidson Record, one must suffer the annoyances of Johnny Truant). But I love it so, so much.

Content Warnings