Reviews

Vathek: Large Print by William Beckford

cookiee27's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

pinarnia's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

GEOK ile bu ay okuduğumuz kitap "Vathek" oldu. Geçen ayki "Otranto Şatosu"ndan sonra yüzümü güldüren bir okuma oldu diyebilirim.

Yazar, pek alışık olmadığımız bir şey yapmış ve gotik ile Doğu'yu birleştirmiş. Her nefeste gotik soluduğumuz bir eser olmamış ama ilginç bir karışım ve benim hoşuma gitti açıkçası. Bir ara aynı kurguyu Batı üzerinden hayal etmeye çalıştım da öyle olsa gülünç kaçardı herhalde. Bu haliyle gülünç değil mi? Evet, yer yer öyle ama ille de olumsuz değerlendirilecek bir durum değil bu. Gotik ya da fantastik metinlerde kilise, haç gibi Hristiyan sembolleri görmeye alışanlar bir de böyle buyursun, İslami sembolleri bu atmosferde tatsınlar.

Kitabımız muzip ve akıcı bir anlatıma sahip. Yazarın "Vathek"i üç gün içinde yazdığını okumuştum, zaten kitabı okurken sağlam temeller üzerinden bir roman yükseltmek yerine keyifli bir okuma deneyimi sunmak ve yeni bir şeyler denenmek üzere yazılmış bir şey okuduğunuzu hissediyorsunuz. Yani ben öyle hissettim en azından. Zaten bir oturuşta çabucak bitebilecek bir kitaptı.

Değişikti.

hewhospeaksoftales's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

jemmak's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

everydayfrog's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

wille44's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Vathek is eighteenth century fan fiction, William Beckford's attempt to write his own 1,001 Nights tale during the peak of the English's Oriental fascination.  It's notability stems from his inversion of the heroic quest and his injection of gothic sensibilities and narrative elements into a fantastical tale, as such Vathek is a story that stands out as a building block in the history of literary horror.  

As a novel it is slapdash, messy, and contradictory, in equal measure too slow and rushed, obviously not something that a great deal of editorial time (if any) was spent on.  That being said, the prose itself flows nicely, especially relative to a contemporary such as Otranto, and Beckford's imagination crackles, as the reader is tossed into a series of escalating macabre absurdities, as the fickle, spineless hero Vathek constantly vacillates between begging forgiveness for his crimes and marching forward intent on entering the gates of hell itself.  

The story serves as an early bellwether of both horror and fantasy, as chasms open and close in an instant, giant towers are built to read the stars, ghouls are raised from the dead, and the supernatural world is constantly comingling with the natural.  Reading it now shows a blueprint of otherworldly events and flawed protagonists attempting to make sense of and sometimes take advantage of them that we later see in the works of Poe and Lovecraft, overall Vathek is a flawed but surprisingly fun story of terrible people insisting upon a karmic reward.

veronikarih's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense fast-paced

2.75

sofie_153's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.25

A painful read! 

alprnt's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

2.0

This really wasn't it.

phoebep14's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

probs the worst book i’ve ever read. i felt like i was just reading words. like if you’re gunna write a book atleast give it a plot… maybe i’m just too stupid to understand it???! idk anyways it was so boring like wtf no