Scan barcode
louise_jayne99's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Homophobia, Grief, and Death of parent
abby_can_read's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This was a good book. I had a good time reading it. I adore Luc and Oliver and their relationship.
Graphic: Homophobia, Grief, and Death of parent
Moderate: Eating disorder, Emotional abuse, and Vomit
Minor: Sexual content
doodlebeanz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Also, Luc could not of been MORE ANNOYING. He was endearing in the first book, but in this book, his flaws were so obvious. He was selfish and self centered and woe is me. He only talked to his friends (who were also written to be SO ANNOYING in this book) when he needed them, he was wholly codependent on everyone (especially Oliver), and he didn't even give Oliver the chance to be understood. Luc had the opposite of character development, I feel he undeveloped where Oliver, who has since gone to therapy to deal with his personal traumas, developed a lot and learned more and more about himself as the book went on. He tried so hard to make Luc understand his side of things, especially the queer identity thing, and Luc was just like... BUT I WANT A RAINBOW ARCH *foot stomp*
The queer identity thing was interesting. I have always been an 'in your face' queer, loving to wear rainbows and shirts proclaiming my sexuality and never caring what anyone else thought, much like Luc. But Oliver was the opposite; he saw it as capitalistic and that it didn't fit how he wanted to be represented, which is valid and fair, but I loved reading about a queer character like that since usually both queer characters (especially gay men) are written as being so insanely flamboyant and in your face gay that it's pretty unrealistic. Oliver is my baby, and I love him endlessly, and he tbh deserved a more grown up person than Luc.
I do think that Luc and Oliver brought out the best in one another. I do think they are a good match and all that, but this sequel never should've gone down the road of marriage. Just them living their lives together would've been a good enough sequel, all we need is OliverLuc fluff. Boyfriend Material was a solid 5 star for me, but sadly Husband Material is only a 3 star... sad and disappointing. Still love this series though, Luc and Oliver have officially given me a book hangover!
Graphic: Homophobia, Grief, and Death of parent
Minor: Eating disorder and Vomit
jess_always_reading's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Homophobia, Vomit, Grief, and Death of parent
luxxltyd's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Homophobia, Grief, and Death of parent
Minor: Eating disorder and Sexual content
booksthatburn's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
I especially like how this deals with grief, and the complex emotions of losing someone who has been a major force in one's life, especially when they've mostly been a negative influence. Someone can be terrible and important, and that's often hard to deal with. The shape of their absence can leave an enormous wound, even if their presence was slow suffering.
HUSBAND MATERIAL could kind of make sense for someone who hadn't read BOYFRIEND MATERIAL, but the emotional roller coaster of the first book means that a lot of processing and establishing of various relationship dynamics took place in BOYFRIEND MATERIAL, with the characters moving forward here after a time jump and a new status quo to be disrupted by all these weddings.
I like the ending, it fits Oliver and Luc as individuals and as a couple. They are figuring out their relationship, not anyone else's, but it takes a while for them to understand what they actually want from the socially proscribed steps and ceremonies on the relationship escalator.
Graphic: Classism
Moderate: Cursing, Death, Homophobia, Infidelity, Grief, Death of parent, and Abandonment
Minor: Body horror, Body shaming, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, and Excrement
levilore_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Now the ending.
Throughout the different weddings, Luc and Oliver obviously have different opinions about what marriage means and in Oliver's case, he is still figuring out what being queer means for him. The other weddings celebrate the joy of marriage and how individualized the experience is for each couple. My main takeaway from the book was that for Luc and Oliver, the act of marriage isn't, well, that important. For them, not being married is more important because it's an act of protest. Neither of them really talk about why they want to be married, rather they are both focused on the expectations that they should want to get married. They already do all the things that a life partner does for each other. Luc shows this when he supports Oliver through his dad's death. Oliver supports Luc when they go to Miles' wedding. The only time their communication fully breaks down is when they are trying to plan an event neither of them want. For the characters, the ending makes sense. Is it extremely dramatic and surprising? Absolutely. But through that act, through their complete honesty with each other, they are able to have their version of what love means, which is them bailing on their own wedding, running into the rain, and making out. (I really enjoyed the sweet touch of the rainbow umbrellas)
In a larger context, I enjoyed this book because it explores the complexity of queerness and marriage. They talk about how marriage is an important right for queer people, but there is no right way to be queer. Having that conventional expression of love, for a relationship that started and continues to be unconventional, just doesn't work for them. And that's the point of the ending. Did it annoy me that they wasted all that time and money just to not get married? Yes, it did. Do I think they could have just had a big party and skipped the ceremony? Absolutely. But I think that's the whole point. From the outside, them running off looks absolutely ridiculous and stupid, but character wise it makes sense because honestly they are both kind of ridiculous and stupid. People want everything to be wrapped up in this beautiful bow of marriage = happiness but I think Alexis Hall uses this book to show how true queerness is about accepting that not being married, not having the flashy rainbow ceremony, should be just as beautiful as all those things. The idea of "love is love" should not just be "love is love if you follow the traditional normative conventions of how love should be expressed", but rather "love is complex and weird and that is beautiful too". And I personally think that is more impactful than them getting married in the first place.
Moderate: Body shaming, Cursing, Eating disorder, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Sexism, Sexual content, Grief, Death of parent, Abandonment, Alcohol, and Classism
Minor: Cancer, Infidelity, Racism, Suicidal thoughts, Transphobia, Excrement, Vomit, Gaslighting, and Injury/Injury detail
londonbridget98's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
I will say i love Alexis Hall’s writing. The side characters were fun and interesting and well-fleshed out, and the humor was really on point. I just felt like we kept going in circles and circles and circles with the same arguments and zero resolutions. I wish I’d never read it and could have just stayed in my happy boyfriend material bubble.
Graphic: Homophobia and Death of parent
Moderate: Vomit and Grief
escsmith's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
2.0
I dislike a lot of this book to be honest. Luc is insufferable, so whiney and immature throughout.
I like the characters less now that I did before. I felt like everything was handled poorly, from the 'am I gay enough' conversation that happened repeatedly, the grief, and everything about the wedding.
The redeeming qualities of this book were the side characters.
Moderate: Homophobia, Grief, and Death of parent
jadehusdanhicks's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
Although arguing is part of even then healthiest relationships, the amount in this book was downright unhealthy. It really put a downer on where live and made this a drag for me to finish. Overall, I wouldn’t recommend this duology to anyone wanting a well written realistic queer romance reccomendations.
Graphic: Death, Homophobia, Mental illness, Grief, Death of parent, Alcohol, and Classism