Scan barcode
tifftastic87's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
It made me more emotional this time around for sure but it was... Definitely 90s. Its always hard when King writes from his villain's perspective because they are always truly horrible and its hard to hear the language they use about other people. However it does truly make you hate Norman.
Graphic: Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Gore, Gun violence, Hate crime, Homophobia, Infidelity, Mental illness, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Pedophilia, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Rape, Self harm, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Slavery, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Police brutality, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, Cannibalism, Stalking, Death of parent, Murder, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Pregnancy, Lesbophobia, Gaslighting, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
dani_j_norwell's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Personally, I'm mostly only familiar with King's most popular titles (The Shining, Pet Sematary, Misery, 11.22.63) and so I was intirgued when I found this older book of his that I hadn't heard of in an Audible 2 for 1 sale. I'm glad I listened to the audiobook for two reasons:
(1)it was a really cool experience; the production of it was excellent with music, sound effects, and background noise related to the scene AND Stephen King himself reads the parts of book that tell Norman's story but also
(2) I truly don't think I could have powered through this book if I had read it.
Rose Madder needs some serious trigger warnings.
I expected domestic violence due to the blurb of the book, but I was not prepared for how detailed and explicit it was. In particular, the book opens with a scene of Norman abusing his pregnant wife, Rose, and, as a result, she loses her baby. The way I just wrote that is ions and ions more gentle than the delivery in the book, however. Sure, it established how evil of a character Norman is from the very beginning but in a story this long and winding, I think such information could have been delivered in a less revolting manner. Aside from that, there's a lot of murdering (with graphic detail, blood, and other bodily fluids), and there's some really sickening thought processes from Norman as he loses his mind. Childhood sexual abuse is also mentioned.
As long as you're prepared for the dark nature of this story, I think you'll find that King's real talent for creating characters with depth, flaws, and demons shines through in this book. No one person is pure evil nor pure benevolence, and King's character development clearly shows that. I found the fantastical, mythological elements of this story to be interesting, but at the same time, (not having a deep knowledge of such things) I didn't quite understand the need for so much of it. Unlike in other King novels, I felt like the story relied heavily on the symbolism of the Rose Madder painting but the significance of/necessity for that was never really made clear.
All in all, I don't think this is one of King's best works. It drags on a bit and it gets disgusting at time, but I don't regret reading it. If nothing else, it was cool to experience a lesser-known novel of a well-known author and therefore analyze all the ways in which it was similar to his more popular tiltes as well as the way it was not.
Graphic: Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Miscarriage, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Police brutality, Stalking, and Murder
Moderate: Child abuse, Racial slurs, Sexual assault, and Torture