Reviews tagging 'Physical abuse'

Memorial by Bryan Washington

17 reviews

madisophi's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective sad fast-paced
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

I get why some people would really like this book, but it simply was not my cup of tea. The characters were so bad for each other and themselves, that it was kind of baffling that they had survived for so long. However, the writing style was beautiful and was what kept me hooked throughout the book. Overall, I feel like this book tried to say something, but I donā€™t really know what.Ā 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

himangi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

whatannikareads's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

this one started out not rough, but a little choppy for me, but from the end of Benson's first part until the end of the novel it really picked up for me. i found i needed time to adjust to the absence in detail from Benson's perspective, but in hindsight I can see it's how Benson process information as direct result of his upbringing/trauma. when the exposition picks up with Mike, i really started to enjoy the quiet unraveling of these individual character's and their family members' lives. it's not a pretty, squeaky clean relationship and it does get abusive at times. i'm not saying that that's a good thing to read about, but it does offer a nuanced perspective on a queer relationship. also, i love that the novel so authentically speaks to Washington's own upbringing; only he could have written this novel with the appreciation of the cultures involved and that intersection of houston and osaka. the characters have flaws and have raw reactions to the conflicts presented to them, which i think is why this novel was so enjoyable--because it's testament to the human experience. i think it'd be a great hbo max show.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

readingwithcoffee's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

One hand I thought the fact this cast is basically entirely people of color (and at least all the characters of note are not white) and their problems donā€™t stem from racism was very refreshing. However the emotional repression and emotionally stunt aspects of the characters and just how miserable they are (though the writing is very good) both made the book very refreshing in some aspects while frustrating in others.Ā 

Also one hand the two men the book is in the perspective of grew up in hostile environments and the main cast is their families so it could just be what they would find normalized but it was difficult to tell of the novel took domestic violence seriously especially violence involving throwing things?Ā 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hmbk's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful reflective sad
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sorcha's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tenstef's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gladiolus17's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Awesome book with stylistic prose. Both main characters are flawed, yet lovable, and thereā€™s a ton of funny interactions with other characters in the book. I cried at the end.

Iā€™d recommend this book if you want to read a story about two people finding their way in life.Ā 

Some specific things I liked:

-Getting lost on the trains in Japan is a mood.Ā 
-I liked the line ā€œfuck around withā€ the rear view mirror. Great verb.Ā 
-Great descriptions of food, and parallels with cooking and getting to know Mitsuko.

One thing that took me out of the story is that Japan doesnā€™t have a tipping culture, so Mikeā€™s dad threatening to take the money out of the Kunihikoā€™s tips wouldnā€™t be possible. This wasnā€™t enough to make me dissatisfied with the story as a whole, though.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sloanefg's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

menomica's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No
Ok, I will say, the writing of this book was very good. Itā€™s what kept me coming back. It was very simplistic, which I liked. It got the point across.Ā 
I feel like the book wanted to do things, but never really delivered. The book itself suffers from not having a proper ending, like much of the storylines in it. I think the most obvious example is with Tam. Heā€™s introduced, as if heā€™s going to a huge player and very influential, but then he fucks off for 20 pages, and only comes back for three lines before Mike ditches him.Ā 
Other things/themes I felt like this book pointed at but never actually took the time to elaborate on:
  • Racism: Besides the ā€œracist jokesā€ and that instance with the racist waiter, the biggest moment of this for me was with the Workers at the play center and how they interacted with Ahmad/Benson was giving very much letā€™s antagonize the black kid cause itā€™s easiest to do. Also, even though it was a joke, them referring to Ahmad as Benā€™s because theyā€™re the only black people in the center feltā€¦ racially motivated. But it was never really elaborated beyond that. The theme of race itself was prominent throughout the book, and I think that was done well because it was obviously from an observational lense, and not with the intent of making commentary, but sometimes it felt like theyā€™d touch on racism and then drop it like a hot potato
  • Tam. Wtf. What was the reason for him being there. For Mike to have a potential love interest?? Nothing developed between them, and yet he was introduced as someone who was going to be super big and important for Mike.Ā THEY DIDNā€™T EVEN HAVE SEXĀ They exchange very minimal conversion and it just felt like there was supposed to be development there but it just never happened. And then Mike just left (like his dad did with him)!
Speaking of Mike. Ew. This is very much a Mike hate account. Heā€™s very immature and inconsiderate. He canā€™t figure out his shit and leaves others to deal with the fall out for that. The biggest example of this, besides the failure that is his relationship with Ben, is that he invited his mother over to the states just to leave to go to Japan. Heā€™s a bit selfish. And also, he literally said a fucking slur??? There was no way he was going to be good with that joke he said at the end of the first chapter. He also invalidates Ben a lot, if not with the fact that they grew up differently economically, then just his emotions in general. He never respects the boundaries that Ben places (the monogamy, letting his mother stay at their place while he was in Japan). So yeah, throughout this book I was very much rooting for Ben to pack his shit and leave him.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings