Scan barcode
mbpm's review against another edition
3.0
I didn't understand good chunks of this book, but it was interesting to see a perspective that was different and written in an interesting way at times.
book_busy's review against another edition
3.0
3.5 very unnecessarily wordy. I felt I struggled to grasp just what the author was getting at even though the overall concepts presented seemed elementary but intriguing. I found some sections rambled on for arguably too long but, then again, I'm new to the whole high -brow philosophical genre. Still, it felt like I grew my brain when reading this book and it was a good pallet cleanser before I dive back into a sea of YA romance/ fantasy.
sinogaze's review against another edition
4.0
frantic and sometimes lowkey self indulgent and strange with its reasoning but very apt for our times
savaging's review against another edition
4.0
I like Baudrillard in spite of myself. He is an old curmudgeon, and when I finish reading him I feel hopeless. This is largely because he's very convincing.
The book is a brilliant critique of Marxism. Just as Baudrillard breaks down the distinctions we make between use value and exchange value, revealing the artificiality buried deep in seemingly-natural use-value and need, he likewise fractures the distinction between capitalist and communist markets. I feel relieved up to a point, because I'm also critical of the deep work-ethic and desire to dominate nature at the core of communism. And yet Baudrillard never stops at a point, and he isn't here to relieve anyone.
The aporia that Baudrillard can't move beyond -- the question of our time -- is why voluntary servitude exists. Most leftist theorists try to show that there's nothing "voluntary" about modern servitude. Baudrillard is either too much a contrarian or too dedicated to honesty to take this track: instead he pursues the possibility that voluntary servitude is deep in human desire.
His theories leave nothing to be done, and nothing to be fought for. It is a legitimate criticism to respond that such ideas could only surface in the mind of a man who hadn't ever gone hungry or braved a sweatshop factory collapse every day at work. And yet, even accounting for his privilege, there is something to his ideas that can't be brushed off . . .
The book is a brilliant critique of Marxism. Just as Baudrillard breaks down the distinctions we make between use value and exchange value, revealing the artificiality buried deep in seemingly-natural use-value and need, he likewise fractures the distinction between capitalist and communist markets. I feel relieved up to a point, because I'm also critical of the deep work-ethic and desire to dominate nature at the core of communism. And yet Baudrillard never stops at a point, and he isn't here to relieve anyone.
The aporia that Baudrillard can't move beyond -- the question of our time -- is why voluntary servitude exists. Most leftist theorists try to show that there's nothing "voluntary" about modern servitude. Baudrillard is either too much a contrarian or too dedicated to honesty to take this track: instead he pursues the possibility that voluntary servitude is deep in human desire.
His theories leave nothing to be done, and nothing to be fought for. It is a legitimate criticism to respond that such ideas could only surface in the mind of a man who hadn't ever gone hungry or braved a sweatshop factory collapse every day at work. And yet, even accounting for his privilege, there is something to his ideas that can't be brushed off . . .
garawill's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
medium-paced
4.75
Make sure that you're sober for this one.
biancala's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
slow-paced