andrewtobin's review
4.0
It was a good follow up for The Mote in God's Eye, and I enjoy the characters, but would have preferred hearing more of the characters focused on in the original novel.
It introduced a lot that was abandoned in the first chapters, that I would have enjoyed hearing more of, and then we were back in the Mote.
It did feel slightly repetitive of the first - but a vastly different resolution.
It introduced a lot that was abandoned in the first chapters, that I would have enjoyed hearing more of, and then we were back in the Mote.
It did feel slightly repetitive of the first - but a vastly different resolution.
mellamoger's review
adventurous
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
mike_word's review
adventurous
lighthearted
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
josh0's review
adventurous
emotional
fast-paced
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
jonathanpalfrey's review
3.0
The book was first published in 1993, but I didn't read it until 2020, because I heard that it was a disappointing sequel. Having read it, well, it's certainly not as good as the original book, but it's good enough to be an acceptable sequel, and I don't regret having bought it.
If you've read [b:The Mote in God's Eye|100365|The Mote in God's Eye (Moties, #1)|Larry Niven|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1399490037l/100365._SY75_.jpg|2190500] and want to find out what happened next, this tells you; and on the whole I'm satisfied with what it tells me. The end of the story is satisfactory; the telling of the tale that gets us there is somewhat less satisfactory. This time, the authors were competent but not inspired.
Although it remains readable and quite interesting throughout, not a lot really happens in the first half. Plenty happens in the second half, but it's rather complicated and the details are a bit hard to follow.
The original book was by Niven and Pournelle, and felt like it. This one tastes more of Niven than Pournelle, which I wouldn't normally regret; but it's Niven in his 50s, and I liked him better when he was young.
The humans in the original book were almost all male, and had no sex lives as far as we knew. As if to compensate for that, in this book there's a mix of sexes, and we get periodic references to their sex lives. Which I could mostly have done without, as it seems an irrelevant distraction, and the authors fail to make me care about who's going to bed with whom. However, it's only a minor distraction, not a major problem.
If you've read [b:The Mote in God's Eye|100365|The Mote in God's Eye (Moties, #1)|Larry Niven|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1399490037l/100365._SY75_.jpg|2190500] and want to find out what happened next, this tells you; and on the whole I'm satisfied with what it tells me. The end of the story is satisfactory; the telling of the tale that gets us there is somewhat less satisfactory. This time, the authors were competent but not inspired.
Although it remains readable and quite interesting throughout, not a lot really happens in the first half. Plenty happens in the second half, but it's rather complicated and the details are a bit hard to follow.
The original book was by Niven and Pournelle, and felt like it. This one tastes more of Niven than Pournelle, which I wouldn't normally regret; but it's Niven in his 50s, and I liked him better when he was young.
The humans in the original book were almost all male, and had no sex lives as far as we knew. As if to compensate for that, in this book there's a mix of sexes, and we get periodic references to their sex lives. Which I could mostly have done without, as it seems an irrelevant distraction, and the authors fail to make me care about who's going to bed with whom. However, it's only a minor distraction, not a major problem.
More...