Scan barcode
karin_goodreads's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Initially I got the book, because of it's cover, it's pretty and I like crows and ravens and such, but now the story is what makes it so exciting! Would it be weird if I said that this horror book could be my new comfort book?
Like, come on, this was a 2-in-1 book, horror AND comedy baby! Most of the story is actually quite odd and fun I'd say. All the creepy and gorey details were also to my liking, but man, Arkle and his humor, mhmm, that got me hooked to the book. He caught me off guard every fucking time and I literally had stop and sit there amused. I really liked the others as well! And I feel so bad for Mario...
The plot was super riveting, the world building and storytelling kept me invested. Got to have some moments of realization that had me saying "OH" out loud.
And the ending?? I was constantly making notes and internally screaming. The actual main character Sep(tember) was phenomenal, how did he do it all? I have no idea. In reality, every one of these five took it like a champ. Basically a story about the power of friendship and love if we get cheesy :)
I don't actually have much to say, I'm scared to spoil too much or start rambling, so I'll keep it short. This was a memorable book and I'm so glad I got to experience it in a stormy weather, it added so much to the ambiance!
Graphic: Animal death, Death, and Gore
Moderate: Body horror, Bullying, Cancer, Violence, Blood, Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Vomit, Medical content, and Car accident
Zombified animals (and people)?lonestarreader's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Bullying, Cancer, Cursing, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Car accident, Death of parent, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
bookcaptivated's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Vomit, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Bullying, Cancer, Stalking, and Car accident
Minor: Death of parent and Pregnancy
lemonsandligaments's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
The main characters are 15 year olds in the 1980s and I think that 5-years-ago me would be able to enjoy this friendgroup-based adventure story, before the pandemic hit. Romance books are frequently lauded for how desirable they represent the human connection, I think I would say the same for this book when it comes to friendship.
For most of the books I have read this year, and even some of my favourite books, I either DESPISE or care little for the characters. This book, however, has a cast of 5 kids who were believably old friends, and it is easy to start caring for them. Their friendship is represented well with the banter. The way settings are described in this book gives a very nostalgic, homely vibe. I also enjoy the at-least-one time outfits were described and the frequent callbacks to things mentioned earlier (e.g. a wet lighter)
The humour of this book is GREAT. I have never laughed at a book this much, I think. Yeah it's a horror and all but the little quips are so witty and apt the fact that they are coming out of a 15 year old's mouth was probably the most unrealistic part of the book. 90% of the humour department is just Arkle.
Seriously that kid won me over pretty quickly, his lines are the funniest even when he
I usually paste some lines I enjoyed but I'll probably end up pasting most of Arkle's dialogue.
AND MACK, that SWEET BOY. Okay now thinking back he's probably just some buff sporty lad
Lamb is good representation for sporty girls who aren't straight up tomboys, it was also interesting to see the world from sep's mind, Hadley was also there (and Korean), I guess?
My favourite parts of the book were always the friendship parts, where all five of them were solving a problem together, reminiscing, or interacting with each other. It did not have to be the five of them, the previous sacrifice box users were also fun to read about because their friendships felt sacred. That's why any romance in this book felt shoehorned and just not great for me.
Criticisms:
Daniel just feels like a punching bag for the rest of them and a reason to not hate Arkle as much. As much as I like Arkle, he was an ass at the start. I wish Daniel had SOME redeeming quality or even better, was less significant. I am sure 15 year old British (I think) boys have better one word insults than "queerdo", it was smart at the start but man was beating a dead AND decomposed horse. With the amount of times it was used, I thought this book would be more gay really.
The Hadley-Sep romance was just, eh. I see why they would get together, and the mutual "I stare at you because it brings me comfort" thing is cute, but it is just too rushed. There was barely any time for them to interact after not talking for YEARS. Surely more goes into falling in love than staring. When the kisses happened I did not feel a tinge of anything. Perhaps the book could have showed their romance REALISTICALLY budding and ending with it hanging in the air instead of going into straight up MACKING within days.
I'd prefer that the romance just not be there though, this book already covers friendships in depth so I don't see the need for romance. Just less romance more friendship please.
Mario and the fox dying. Did they have to die? The part where Sep replayed Mario's "I love you" voice note almost made me well up. Not really a criticism but they're the only faultless side characters that are not family, and BOTH died.
Why was there nothing on the aftermath. Sep found out that he was the reason why Mario died, therapyy???? How about sweet Mack, oh my gosh I just realised a reason why his name could be mack lmao. Anyway Mack triggered ALL OF IT, why isn't he suffering from guilt? Not that I want them to suffer but it just doesn't feel realistic. I thought lamb would be more mad at him too.
The fact that every animal in the forest died and a MAN died with a open-chested deer in his clinic (and another man-turned-ragdoll in the forest)? Police investigation?? Sep as a close contact? 5 kids appearing VERY INJURED and smeared with nature?? Suspicion??? How did they get back to normal?
The logic of the box too. So each of their sacrifices actually means something bad about everyone (except sweet Mack). Sep's one is his negativity in a teddy bear and stopping his feels powers off the teddy bear, alright. Why does he have to get into the box?? Is he the sacrifice or something? Did he destroy the box with his biology?
Honestly most of my criticisms are with the last two chapters, all that buildup for a strange "solution" and aftermath. Also was the letter he gave to Hadley a love letter? In that time in the garage with his mother, did he write "I <3 U HADLEY"? At least allude to what it is because I was genuinely thinking it was runes or something.
More fleshed out flashbacks to that one summer. Rather than listing out sights and smells, actually set the scene of their childhood and put the banter there too, I'd get even more attached to their friendgroup that way.
I honestly have no idea who the target audience for this book is, because on one hand it features kids, talks about friendship in a very Enid Blyton way, the world building is okay at best, and everything sort of wraps up in a neat little bow. On the other hand, some decently scary gore.
This book had the foundations of a brilliant piece but some elements were just out of place.
Graphic: Gore
corireed's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Body horror, Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Medical content, Medical trauma, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
charliechops's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, and Death
Moderate: Gore