Reviews

Vento & Flipper by Haruki Murakami, Antonietta Pastore

giipsophila's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced

3.5

dwillig's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

moomae's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

nicnicthelibrarycat's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.25

analogn's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

tylerco's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75

theseptascamp's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

It is painfully clear that these two short novels come from what Murakami describes as his "immature period." At times, these books read like the rantings of a sexually repressed high school boy with all the nuance you'd expect to find from one such youngster. The twinges of basic philosophy, alcohol fueled nonsense, and loose sexual encounters speak only to psuedo bohemian/intellectuals on the truths of an true artist.

In other words, these novels are bullshit. They show hints of who Murakami will eventually grow into with his later works, but also show a vulnerable and almost cringy peak into the past of one of the better surrealist contemporaries. However, the fact that these exist for the world to read show the growth one is able to make. Reading Wind/Pinball and something like Norwegian Wood or Kafka on the Shore show such a leap in skill and literary style it's almost hard to believe the same author penned all four.

A rating of a two might be a bit harsh, but this was certainly a difficult and jarring set of novels to get through. The few moments of clarity found only in Pinball, 1973 are simply not enough to make up for the atrocity that was Hear the Wind Sing (or honestly 95% of Pinball, 1973 for that matter).

chyneyee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

I don't know what to feel about this book. After all, it's one of Murakami's earliest novels, but I can sense we probably won't go well because I just couldn't delve into his uniquely strange world.

chazzarooni's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

alx7p's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Davvero carino! Ho preferito altri libri scritti da lui ma Murakami rimane comunque insuperabile.
Lo consiglio!