Scan barcode
nofacelif's review against another edition
challenging
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
I enjoyed that the protagonist's flaws and character growth were a significant part of the novel and the discussions surrounding dignity. Ishiguro brilliantly manages to establish a political undertone without it being the main focus. However, I think I just didn't connect much with the novel. There isn't really a story, and it's very slow-paced and boring at times. Therefore, it came as a letdown after reading Never Let Me Go.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Moderate: Grief and War
paulinevb's review against another edition
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
Moderate: Grief and War
zmiya's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism and Death of parent
stephbakerbooks's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
This book is very slow-moving, with a lot of reflection and internal debate, particularly about what it means to have dignity. I had mixed feelings while reading it—it's not very long but took me a while to get through; I was expecting more plot; our narrator is a bit unreliable (or at least, not honest with himself about the true nature of events he relays), is detached, and makes frustrating decisions. There's no real climax at the end, no real resolution. I was left a little confused.
But I read this for book club, and this book lends itself to some excellent discussions. We talked about dignity, we talked about decision-making and owning up to your life choices, we talked about what makes a person good and the importance of banter. There's a reason this book won the Booker Prize back in 1989, when it was released. And though I'm not sure that I loved it, I can recognize the brilliant writing style and the themes and emotions it brings up that makes it good literature.
Also, it's impossible to read this and not imagine Mr. Carson and Mrs. Hughes as Mr. Stevens and Miss Kenton.
But I read this for book club, and this book lends itself to some excellent discussions. We talked about dignity, we talked about decision-making and owning up to your life choices, we talked about what makes a person good and the importance of banter. There's a reason this book won the Booker Prize back in 1989, when it was released. And though I'm not sure that I loved it, I can recognize the brilliant writing style and the themes and emotions it brings up that makes it good literature.
Also, it's impossible to read this and not imagine Mr. Carson and Mrs. Hughes as Mr. Stevens and Miss Kenton.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism, Grief, and Death of parent
Moderate: Bullying
shelfofunread's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Content Warnings
Minor: Death, Antisemitism, Death of parent, and War
nickoliver's review against another edition
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.75
Unfortunately, I didn't particularly care for the majority of this book. I went into it with already low expectations because bookish people I trust found it boring, but I'd still hoped that it would pleasantly surprise me. But it didn't.
The story was very much a character-driven one with barely any plot. It was about a butler named Mr Stevens, who spent decades working for a "great gentleman" named Lord Darlington. Now working for a new employer, he decided to embark on a little drive across the country to go see a former housekeeper and ask her to come back. During that trip, he reminisced a lot about working for Lord Darlington and what had led people to think of the presumed gentleman as a bad man.
Most of the book was precisely that - Mr Stevens remembering what had happened and coming to terms with the fact that the man he'd thought he was honoured to serve hadn't worked to better humanity - quite the opposite, actually. The setting was the 1920s and 1930s during the memories, so we were talking about antisemitism and Nazis here.
While a format like that isn't inherently something I dislike, what made it hard for me to get invested was Mr Stevens himself. He was a very difficult protagonist to be in the head of. Most of the time, he was very cold and had an almost robotic way of talking - he lived and breathed his job and could come across as quite heartless because of it, because he never actually seemed to care about other people's feelings, especially other employees like the maids and housekeeper. He loved the idea of serving great men and being in the room when great important things were happening. A lot of the time, that was reflected quite well in the writing - Mr Stevens would use words from a military vocabulary, likening himself to a general.
It was insinuated between the lines that he could've had a romance with the housekeeper, Miss Kenton, but he refused to actually show his feelings. When she first started to work for him, they bumped heads a lot, because he was bullheaded and refused to admit when he was wrong. At times, he came across as quite misogynistic in the way he treated the women, even mansplaining Miss Kenton's own work to her. Since he wasn't really called out a lot, I spent much of my time reading being angry at him and wanting to shake some sense into him. It made for a quite uncomfortable reading experience, since I could think of many a better things than be stuck in his head all the time.
What annoyed me about the road trip - and the trip down memory lane - was how often Mr Stevens would get off-topic. He'd start out talking about one thing but then spend page after page talking about something else, and by the time he came back around, I'd almost forgotten what it was that he'd d talked about originally. There were so many tangents about what made a butler great, and it was difficult to understand sometimes.
It was also a bit hard to care for the part of the plot that took place in Mr Stevens's present times. Technically, a lot of it was plot-relevant, but the way the protagonist acted and thought clouded my judgment of the importance of it. It was like I was so busy being frustrated at his actions and manners that I didn't pick up on the relevance until I was finished with the book and let it settle in my mind for a while. And I don't think that was Ishiguro's intention.
Now, what did I like about the plot? I really liked following Mr Stevens's journey to accept the truth about Lord Darlington. For most of the book, he was in denial about it because he didn't want to have to realise that he'd spent decades working for a bad man, and he would defend him to anyone who attempted to slander Lord Darlington. It was interesting to see Mr Stevens's wall coming down and experience his eventual breakdown over it. That was very well done.
Ishiguro was also quite talented at saying things without stating them outright. For example, neither Miss Kenton nor Mr Stevens ever talk about being in love with one another, but Miss Kenton's frustration at the lack of emotions coming from the butler still made it obvious that there was more that wasn't said out loud. A lot was between the lines and subtle, and I loved that.
Lastly, Ishiguro's writing was a bit of a challenge for me. The paragraphs were quite long, sometimes an entire page without a break, which made it exhausting to read the story. I had to concentrate hard because if I didn't, I'd lose the thread immediately and would've read on without a clue as to what was going on. Mr Stevens also had a stilted, rather old-fashioned way of talking and thinking. Plus, there were a lot of repetitions, especially in dialogue, which added to Mr Stevens's speech sounding robotic, as if he was constantly reading from a script and determined to not stray from it. If it were a modern story instead of one set between the 1920 and 1950s, I would've thought Mr Stevens was trying to sound like he thought a butler was supposed to sound like.
Overall, I mostly just found this book exhausting to read and was happy and relieved when I was finished. It didn't take me all too long, but Mr Stevens as the protagonist in addition to the challenging writing still made me tired. I did really enjoy some of the things that Ishiguro didn't say out loud in the story, and the setting was quite interesting.
The story was very much a character-driven one with barely any plot. It was about a butler named Mr Stevens, who spent decades working for a "great gentleman" named Lord Darlington. Now working for a new employer, he decided to embark on a little drive across the country to go see a former housekeeper and ask her to come back. During that trip, he reminisced a lot about working for Lord Darlington and what had led people to think of the presumed gentleman as a bad man.
Most of the book was precisely that - Mr Stevens remembering what had happened and coming to terms with the fact that the man he'd thought he was honoured to serve hadn't worked to better humanity - quite the opposite, actually. The setting was the 1920s and 1930s during the memories, so we were talking about antisemitism and Nazis here.
While a format like that isn't inherently something I dislike, what made it hard for me to get invested was Mr Stevens himself. He was a very difficult protagonist to be in the head of. Most of the time, he was very cold and had an almost robotic way of talking - he lived and breathed his job and could come across as quite heartless because of it, because he never actually seemed to care about other people's feelings, especially other employees like the maids and housekeeper. He loved the idea of serving great men and being in the room when great important things were happening. A lot of the time, that was reflected quite well in the writing - Mr Stevens would use words from a military vocabulary, likening himself to a general.
It was insinuated between the lines that he could've had a romance with the housekeeper, Miss Kenton, but he refused to actually show his feelings. When she first started to work for him, they bumped heads a lot, because he was bullheaded and refused to admit when he was wrong. At times, he came across as quite misogynistic in the way he treated the women, even mansplaining Miss Kenton's own work to her. Since he wasn't really called out a lot, I spent much of my time reading being angry at him and wanting to shake some sense into him. It made for a quite uncomfortable reading experience, since I could think of many a better things than be stuck in his head all the time.
What annoyed me about the road trip - and the trip down memory lane - was how often Mr Stevens would get off-topic. He'd start out talking about one thing but then spend page after page talking about something else, and by the time he came back around, I'd almost forgotten what it was that he'd d talked about originally. There were so many tangents about what made a butler great, and it was difficult to understand sometimes.
It was also a bit hard to care for the part of the plot that took place in Mr Stevens's present times. Technically, a lot of it was plot-relevant, but the way the protagonist acted and thought clouded my judgment of the importance of it. It was like I was so busy being frustrated at his actions and manners that I didn't pick up on the relevance until I was finished with the book and let it settle in my mind for a while. And I don't think that was Ishiguro's intention.
Now, what did I like about the plot? I really liked following Mr Stevens's journey to accept the truth about Lord Darlington. For most of the book, he was in denial about it because he didn't want to have to realise that he'd spent decades working for a bad man, and he would defend him to anyone who attempted to slander Lord Darlington. It was interesting to see Mr Stevens's wall coming down and experience his eventual breakdown over it. That was very well done.
Ishiguro was also quite talented at saying things without stating them outright. For example, neither Miss Kenton nor Mr Stevens ever talk about being in love with one another, but Miss Kenton's frustration at the lack of emotions coming from the butler still made it obvious that there was more that wasn't said out loud. A lot was between the lines and subtle, and I loved that.
Lastly, Ishiguro's writing was a bit of a challenge for me. The paragraphs were quite long, sometimes an entire page without a break, which made it exhausting to read the story. I had to concentrate hard because if I didn't, I'd lose the thread immediately and would've read on without a clue as to what was going on. Mr Stevens also had a stilted, rather old-fashioned way of talking and thinking. Plus, there were a lot of repetitions, especially in dialogue, which added to Mr Stevens's speech sounding robotic, as if he was constantly reading from a script and determined to not stray from it. If it were a modern story instead of one set between the 1920 and 1950s, I would've thought Mr Stevens was trying to sound like he thought a butler was supposed to sound like.
Overall, I mostly just found this book exhausting to read and was happy and relieved when I was finished. It didn't take me all too long, but Mr Stevens as the protagonist in addition to the challenging writing still made me tired. I did really enjoy some of the things that Ishiguro didn't say out loud in the story, and the setting was quite interesting.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism, Death of parent, and War
Moderate: Misogyny
v171's review against another edition
emotional
reflective
relaxing
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Ishiguro will never cease to amaze me with how well he constructs such an intimate, gentle story that keeps me invested and in love with the characters. The Remains of the Day was just that and more. The character development was impeccable, being realistic but also interesting. The construction of the story was also excellent, seamlessly weaving the current day with the main character's nostalgic memories, but joining each beat with a common theme. While the story felt slow and aimless at times, I still couldn't help but fall in love with it. Ishiguro is quickly becoming one of my favorite authors.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Antisemitism
Minor: Death of parent
literalottie's review against another edition
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Absolutely beautiful. After I read (and loved) Never Let Me Go I knew I had to read more of Ishiguro's work, and I figured his most acclaimed novel would be the best place to start. While this didn't floor me quite as much as the former did, I am still amazed by how beautiful Ishiguro's writing is.
Much of what made Never Let Me Go brilliant also makes this brilliant, despite them also being so different and distinct from each other. To borrow a phrase I used in my review of the formed, The Remains of the Day is a similarly "quietly heartbreaking" novel. The voice of our main character, Stevens, feels so authentic and compelling, and despite me not being an aging English butler, I found him strangely relatable. I felt like I learnt a lot from Stevens, and also learnt a lot beside him.
I love how Ishiguro frames the story around memories and the recollection of them - how one moment can inspire recollection of another, which in turn leads to another. Despite it being incredibly genuine to how people think and feel, you'd think it would make for unruly and messy storytelling, but Ishiguro pulls it off expertly. I already have my next book of choice of his on order, and I look forward to seeing more of what he has to offer.
Much of what made Never Let Me Go brilliant also makes this brilliant, despite them also being so different and distinct from each other. To borrow a phrase I used in my review of the formed, The Remains of the Day is a similarly "quietly heartbreaking" novel. The voice of our main character, Stevens, feels so authentic and compelling, and despite me not being an aging English butler, I found him strangely relatable. I felt like I learnt a lot from Stevens, and also learnt a lot beside him.
I love how Ishiguro frames the story around memories and the recollection of them - how one moment can inspire recollection of another, which in turn leads to another. Despite it being incredibly genuine to how people think and feel, you'd think it would make for unruly and messy storytelling, but Ishiguro pulls it off expertly. I already have my next book of choice of his on order, and I look forward to seeing more of what he has to offer.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent
Moderate: Antisemitism
Minor: War
berrytoki's review against another edition
emotional
funny
informative
inspiring
reflective
sad
slow-paced
4.0
Content Warnings
Moderate: Antisemitism and Death of parent
dee_dreams's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent
Moderate: Antisemitism