Scan barcode
halthemonarch's review against another edition
dark
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
The most impactful and Briseis-centric narrative is told in the beginning. After a certain point, this becomes a story about Achilles and Patroclus, and to a lesser extent Agamemnon and all the men around a helpless Briseis.
We begin at the sacking of her town. Achilles’ war cry grew closer and closer until his army was at their gates. He felled them easily and Briseis watches him kill her brother. She had a husband, parents and siblings, but in one fell swoop, she and all the women not brave enough to jump from their chambers become sex slaves for Achilles’ army. Briseis is highborn and thus is designated to Achilles himself, who is mostly uninterested in her until Briseis begins to bathe regularly in the ocean. Achilles’ mother is a sea nymph, so anything that reminds him of her stokes him. For a while that is their way until Agamemnon disrespects a priest by denying his daughter, his sex slave, to be returned to him. The camp falls ill, no longer under Apollo’s protection and the girl is returned. Agamemnon demands Briseis in return.
Later, when making the final efforts to fell Troy, Agamemnon and the rest of the main forces need Achilles, but he refuses to go for the disrespect shown to him. Patroclus, his more-than-a-bestie bestie suggests he go in Achilles’ stead and fight in his armor to inspire the men. Achilles sees the sense in this plan but Briseis (silently and to herself) predicts this will be the end of Patroclus. Indeed Hector kills him and Achilles falls apart, avenges him, and falls apart again. The king pleads with him for his son’s body, to which Achilles relents. Then Achilles is slain in battle, something he was yearning for after losing Patroclus. His son vows to avenge him, and Briseis meditates on how the story of Troy would live on in the sons these women had; that their lives weren’t glamorous or pretty, but history would remember the silent girls.
Like in The Wolf Den, I found the constant “you wouldn’t get it, you’re not a slave” aside to be condescending. A reader should be able to empathize with a protagonist who has no agency over what horrible things happen to them. Like Amara, Briseis is pushed around her story and the only agency and defiance we see of her is her introspection. When that introspection stops and begins to split off into other characters, she becomes weaker in comparison. The other characters are doing things, or their active refusal to do things is part of the narrative-- Briseis gets raped repeatedly, disrespected by Agamemmnon, and then disregarded by the story up until her final cry-- a flickering match in a dark room-- “the children at our breasts now will remember the women of Troy” type shi. I enjoyed the bit where she attempted to run away because of course she would (although the result frustrated me)
As always, books from this period in time captivate me. The literary voice is nice, and I do appreciate the intention of illuminating mostly anonymous women from mythology. I believe Briseis in Homer’s source poem is simply a woman from Lyrnessus who was given to Achilles and then later given to Agamemnon. In this book she still felt like that to me, she just had far more speaking lines. Barker wasn’t altering the story, but expanding it within the mythology. I don’t like that a book that promised to be about the girls became mostly about the boys, Achilles, Patroclus, and Agamemnon, and to a lesser extent the war system all around them all. I'm giving this the good ol' three star special.
We begin at the sacking of her town. Achilles’ war cry grew closer and closer until his army was at their gates. He felled them easily and Briseis watches him kill her brother. She had a husband, parents and siblings, but in one fell swoop, she and all the women not brave enough to jump from their chambers become sex slaves for Achilles’ army. Briseis is highborn and thus is designated to Achilles himself, who is mostly uninterested in her until Briseis begins to bathe regularly in the ocean. Achilles’ mother is a sea nymph, so anything that reminds him of her stokes him. For a while that is their way until Agamemnon disrespects a priest by denying his daughter, his sex slave, to be returned to him. The camp falls ill, no longer under Apollo’s protection and the girl is returned. Agamemnon demands Briseis in return.
Later, when making the final efforts to fell Troy, Agamemnon and the rest of the main forces need Achilles, but he refuses to go for the disrespect shown to him. Patroclus, his more-than-a-bestie bestie suggests he go in Achilles’ stead and fight in his armor to inspire the men. Achilles sees the sense in this plan but Briseis (silently and to herself) predicts this will be the end of Patroclus. Indeed Hector kills him and Achilles falls apart, avenges him, and falls apart again. The king pleads with him for his son’s body, to which Achilles relents. Then Achilles is slain in battle, something he was yearning for after losing Patroclus. His son vows to avenge him, and Briseis meditates on how the story of Troy would live on in the sons these women had; that their lives weren’t glamorous or pretty, but history would remember the silent girls.
Like in The Wolf Den, I found the constant “you wouldn’t get it, you’re not a slave” aside to be condescending. A reader should be able to empathize with a protagonist who has no agency over what horrible things happen to them. Like Amara, Briseis is pushed around her story and the only agency and defiance we see of her is her introspection. When that introspection stops and begins to split off into other characters, she becomes weaker in comparison. The other characters are doing things, or their active refusal to do things is part of the narrative-- Briseis gets raped repeatedly, disrespected by Agamemmnon, and then disregarded by the story up until her final cry-- a flickering match in a dark room-- “the children at our breasts now will remember the women of Troy” type shi. I enjoyed the bit where she attempted to run away because of course she would (although the result frustrated me)
As always, books from this period in time captivate me. The literary voice is nice, and I do appreciate the intention of illuminating mostly anonymous women from mythology. I believe Briseis in Homer’s source poem is simply a woman from Lyrnessus who was given to Achilles and then later given to Agamemnon. In this book she still felt like that to me, she just had far more speaking lines. Barker wasn’t altering the story, but expanding it within the mythology. I don’t like that a book that promised to be about the girls became mostly about the boys, Achilles, Patroclus, and Agamemnon, and to a lesser extent the war system all around them all. I'm giving this the good ol' three star special.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Slavery, Violence, and War
Minor: Physical abuse and Rape
tintinreaney's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
hopeful
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Slavery, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Death, Sexual content, and Grief
Minor: Suicide
v0lha16's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape, Self harm, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, and Slavery
naoml's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This is masterful. This is a beautiful critic of what voices are deemed important. How are people remembered? Who gets to tell the stories? Is it even possible to know a full truth?
The story follows the myth of Achilles but for once not through his eyes or the eyes of someone who adores him. We see that "heroism" is sometimes simply violence, depending on the lens you are viewing it through. However, this also gives us the nuance of sometimes evil doesn't always look that way, and even worse: not everything and evil person does is bad. Humanity is more complex than that, and you own no one forgiveness based on a single action or moment.
I can't fully put into words my thoughts and feelings on it, but I do know that it is incredible. The story will keep permeating my thoughts for a long time to come.
**please read the trigger warnings
The story follows the myth of Achilles but for once not through his eyes or the eyes of someone who adores him. We see that "heroism" is sometimes simply violence, depending on the lens you are viewing it through. However, this also gives us the nuance of sometimes evil doesn't always look that way, and even worse: not everything and evil person does is bad. Humanity is more complex than that, and you own no one forgiveness based on a single action or moment.
I can't fully put into words my thoughts and feelings on it, but I do know that it is incredible. The story will keep permeating my thoughts for a long time to come.
**please read the trigger warnings
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Emotional abuse, Gore, Rape, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Slavery, Violence, Blood, Kidnapping, Grief, Alcohol, Colonisation, and War
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Body horror, Confinement, Death, Suicidal thoughts, Fire/Fire injury, and Alcohol
savage_book_review's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
The voices of Achilles, Patroclus, Agamemnon, Odysseyus, Ajax and all of the other heroes (or villains depending on your allegiances) of the Trojan War have echoed down the millenia into myth and legend. But what about those silent women, orphaned and widowed by a war they had no part in starting and forced into serving the men who took the lives of their loved ones? Briseis' name is well known, but her story? Well, for once, let the tale not be told by the victor, but the victim.
One day I'll find a Greek myth retelling I don't like. But today is not that day. This is beautifully written; lyrical, heartfelt, epic prose that runs over with emotion and buries its way into your consciousness. It's not poetry, but it is definitely poetic and so feels like it has almost perfect tone to complement the source material. There is something about the best authors writing these retellings (Madeline Miller and Jennifer Saint to name but two); they all have their own style, but they all embody this same tone in their work. So as soon as I 'felt' it, I knew I was in for a good read!
The only caveat to this praise is that there are moments where speech sounds almost too modern. I understand that it's meant to be soldiers talking in their own rough and ready way, but there was something about certain turns of phrase that jolted me out of the serene state the rest of the writing put me in. I'm all for a good round of turning the air blue, but even the cursing felt out of place in certain moments. It all still works and doesn't ruin the story or the flow, but I think the rest of the story feels so authentic the modern parlance sticks out like a sore thumb.
Each character is wonderfully rendered; Briseis herself comes across as a strong, capable woman, utterly defeated by circumstances, resigned to her fate and yet still with an independent streak that means while she might bend, she won't break. Her interactions with Achilles manage to find that sweet spot, where he is neither slave master that sees her as nothing but chattel, nor the dashing romantic hero that she can't help but fall in love with. It's a fabulous rendering of their relationship. Patroclus does come across a little more as the sweet, shy boy who befriends the slaves rather than beats them, but it's a great contrast to the rest of the Greek warriors. While the nature of Achilles and Patroclus' relationship is never explicitly stated, the small illustrations of their love for one another, whether platonic or romantic, are just gorgeous. Once again, I found myself hoping that the author might just flip the myth on its head... and this in a book that's not meant to be as sympathetic to them!
The book also conveys the harsh realities of 10 years living in a war camp and the bloodiness of battle, without being overly graphic or sensationalist. It's atmospheric and not pleasant at times, but it's never difficult to read.
There is a dual POV set up, alternating chapters between Briseis in the first person, and Achilles in the third. Switching between first and third person is one of the writing devices I struggle with, and yet it STILL manages to flow and keep me engaged.
This book deserves its accolades and is one I would definitely recommend. Book two is on order at the library, so I'll look forward to continuing this series soon!
One day I'll find a Greek myth retelling I don't like. But today is not that day. This is beautifully written; lyrical, heartfelt, epic prose that runs over with emotion and buries its way into your consciousness. It's not poetry, but it is definitely poetic and so feels like it has almost perfect tone to complement the source material. There is something about the best authors writing these retellings (Madeline Miller and Jennifer Saint to name but two); they all have their own style, but they all embody this same tone in their work. So as soon as I 'felt' it, I knew I was in for a good read!
The only caveat to this praise is that there are moments where speech sounds almost too modern. I understand that it's meant to be soldiers talking in their own rough and ready way, but there was something about certain turns of phrase that jolted me out of the serene state the rest of the writing put me in. I'm all for a good round of turning the air blue, but even the cursing felt out of place in certain moments. It all still works and doesn't ruin the story or the flow, but I think the rest of the story feels so authentic the modern parlance sticks out like a sore thumb.
Each character is wonderfully rendered; Briseis herself comes across as a strong, capable woman, utterly defeated by circumstances, resigned to her fate and yet still with an independent streak that means while she might bend, she won't break. Her interactions with Achilles manage to find that sweet spot, where he is neither slave master that sees her as nothing but chattel, nor the dashing romantic hero that she can't help but fall in love with. It's a fabulous rendering of their relationship. Patroclus does come across a little more as the sweet, shy boy who befriends the slaves rather than beats them, but it's a great contrast to the rest of the Greek warriors. While the nature of Achilles and Patroclus' relationship is never explicitly stated, the small illustrations of their love for one another, whether platonic or romantic, are just gorgeous. Once again, I found myself hoping that the author might just flip the myth on its head... and this in a book that's not meant to be as sympathetic to them!
The book also conveys the harsh realities of 10 years living in a war camp and the bloodiness of battle, without being overly graphic or sensationalist. It's atmospheric and not pleasant at times, but it's never difficult to read.
There is a dual POV set up, alternating chapters between Briseis in the first person, and Achilles in the third. Switching between first and third person is one of the writing devices I struggle with, and yet it STILL manages to flow and keep me engaged.
This book deserves its accolades and is one I would definitely recommend. Book two is on order at the library, so I'll look forward to continuing this series soon!
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Death, Slavery, Violence, Grief, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cursing, Gore, Infidelity, Misogyny, Rape, Sexual violence, Suicide, Blood, Medical content, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, Alcohol, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Minor: Homophobia, Sexual content, Excrement, Vomit, Pregnancy, and Classism
void_uwulucinda's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Death, Rape, Sexual violence, Slavery, Violence, Blood, Grief, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
dendodge's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape, Slavery, and War
clemireads's review against another edition
emotional
informative
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape, Sexual violence, Slavery, Violence, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Child death, Death, Blood, Grief, and Pregnancy
marmoo's review against another edition
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? No
3.0
There’s no shortage of literary projects that set out to dig out the female collateral buried in foundational male epics, though not all of them assemble those excavated remains with equal skill. While it remains an interesting project for holding up a mirror to our modern gender norms—and perhaps tracing some of them back to the source—this addition to the canon of canon-critical feminist retellings never fully cohered for me.
I’m intrigued by Pat Barker’s effort to give voice to the unsung victims of the Trojan war, I just wish that voice was a wee bit more distinctive. For all that the novel centers the unlucky Briseis, it doesn’t give her a whole lot of depth.
One never gets the sense that Briseis is a woman from a different time and worldview, which is generally my yardstick for success in historical—or historical-ish—fiction. The insertion of slang vernacular (“Cheers, lads,” quoth Achilles on his first up-close appearance) seems intended to recontextualize the mythic violence as something more familiar, but it had a jarring effect.
Likely that’s by design, foregrounding the continuity of female suffering during men’s wars down through the ages, but it has the unfortunate effect of once again pulling focus from the titular women and back again to Achilles. Unlike Briseis’s bland first-person narration, the third person shift in his section draws us into an unsettling and (sorry!) more interesting world, a world governed by deadly notions of honor and the whims of the gods.
Still, despite the sometimes underwhelming prose, Pat Barker effectively wields the brutality of her chosen setting to jostle readers out of our familiar reactions to a familiar story.
I’m intrigued by Pat Barker’s effort to give voice to the unsung victims of the Trojan war, I just wish that voice was a wee bit more distinctive. For all that the novel centers the unlucky Briseis, it doesn’t give her a whole lot of depth.
One never gets the sense that Briseis is a woman from a different time and worldview, which is generally my yardstick for success in historical—or historical-ish—fiction. The insertion of slang vernacular (“Cheers, lads,” quoth Achilles on his first up-close appearance) seems intended to recontextualize the mythic violence as something more familiar, but it had a jarring effect.
Likely that’s by design, foregrounding the continuity of female suffering during men’s wars down through the ages, but it has the unfortunate effect of once again pulling focus from the titular women and back again to Achilles. Unlike Briseis’s bland first-person narration, the third person shift in his section draws us into an unsettling and (sorry!) more interesting world, a world governed by deadly notions of honor and the whims of the gods.
Still, despite the sometimes underwhelming prose, Pat Barker effectively wields the brutality of her chosen setting to jostle readers out of our familiar reactions to a familiar story.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual violence, Slavery, and War
_rowantree_'s review against another edition
dark
emotional
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
This is a perspective that is definitely missing from most of our stories, and it was written in a very nuanced way. That said, for some reason I felt a bit detached from the characters. For me, this book works better as a prompt for discussion rather than to take the reader into the experiences the characters are going through. This book very deliberately tells the story of the Iliad through a female narrator, but I think I would have got more out of it if it had been her story rather than Achilles’.
This book is unsurprisingly very violent and sexual violence plays a big role, but I did appreciate that it never felt like a gratuitous portrayal of rape
This book is unsurprisingly very violent and sexual violence plays a big role, but I did appreciate that it never felt like a gratuitous portrayal of rape
Content Warnings
Graphic: Rape, Sexism, Slavery, Violence, and War