Reviews

Salem's Lot by Stephen King

sam_the_bibliophile's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

flamingfern's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

throatsprockets's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

When I first read this book as a tennager, I was disappointed in what I thought of as a non-ending. Revisiting it in my 40s, I think this is one of King's best books with one of his best endings.

kelleycailin's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

cicatrizing's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I didn’t know this book was about vampires before I read it and honestly I think that made the book a lot better. The slow burn was more tantalizing than frustrating for me.

szmnsk_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

lemme get the check that was tew good

amid's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

The best Stephen King’s book in my opinion.

andipants's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Considering I call myself a fan of horror, I'd long felt somewhat remiss that the only Stephen King I'd read was the Dark Tower series - those were good, don't get me wrong, but they're not the kind of horror that most people tend to associate with Stephen King. So on a whim, and knowing absolutely nothing about the plot going in, I picked this one up at the library and dug in. It was...okay?

The plot and the setup were interesting. If nothing else, it was refreshing to rewind to a time when vampires were terrifying, evil monsters rather than emo-kid-pretty anti-heroes. The ending was satisfying without being pat. The main characters were likable enough, although endowed with no more dimension than the pages they were printed on. I didn't find it particularly scary, but then vampires aren't really my jam in that regard; the story was compelling enough to keep me reading, at any rate.

What really irked me was the sometimes pages-long pseudo-philosophical ramblings about darkness and the mundanity of evil and the fricking weather in Maine - cripes. Maybe forty years ago some of that would have come across as profound, but I doubt it. Or maybe I'm just a cynic. Either way, I think some sharper editing wouldn't have gone amiss there. Overall though, it wasn't a bad read, and if classic vampire horror is your cup of tea, you could do much worse.

katelysmith's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

bre_cheese's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75