karin05's review against another edition
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
dudette's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Torture, Murder, and Death
aprater's review against another edition
5.0
Female spies who engineer their own missions and make them work despite repeated challenges? And it isn't a barely disguised romance? Sign me up!
ecari's review against another edition
3.0
A good story, but not that well-written - but not that big of a deal when you are listening! I liked the female protagonists and the idea of British female spies during WWII (which really happened, although I suspect not quite like this book). Decent escape fiction, in all.
nogakhen's review against another edition
So much exposition in the first few chapters, and while the story might be interesting, the set-up is so dull and full of all the "female MC written by a dude" tropes. I might give it another go, but it's not worth my energy right now.
ikuo1000's review against another edition
3.0
The problem I have with historical fiction is that I always figure there must be plenty of amazing true stories from the same time period, so why not read about those? Jackdaws brings attention to the Special Operations Executive, the British military division responsible for secret operatives sent behind enemy lines. According to a note in the book, fifty women really were sent into France as spies during World War II. So what are their stories? I'm sure they're as fascinating, or even more so, than anything anyone could make up.
Well, putting my own prejudices aside, the book was good. It held my interest enough that I looked forward to reading it each night, but not so much that it kept me up later than I wanted. It's the kind of book that does well as a TV substitute. It reads like a movie, it's entertaining, and it's a bit suspenseful.
Just like a movie, though, there was what I would consider superfluous romance that distracted from the action and actual plot.
Frequently when a book includes foreign words or references to political or military organizations, I'm annoyed that the reader is assumed to have sufficient knowledge of the references; I appreciate it when additional context is given, or when a foreign phrase is subtly translated. However, I dare say that Ken Follett goes overboard: Is it really necessary to explicitly define the word "suffragette"?
Finally, near the end, I think the main character Flick made two uncharacteristic moves - she made a decision against her better judgment, and she didn't react quickly enough given the circumstances. I wonder why Follett weakened her character after spending so much time before and after developing her character. Maybe just to show that she's human and makes mistakes, too.
Anyway, I wasn't blown away by the book, but it's easy reading and the kind of book that's good for passing the time. Since Ken Follett is such a prolific writer, I'll probably pick up more of his books from the library from time to time.
Well, putting my own prejudices aside, the book was good. It held my interest enough that I looked forward to reading it each night, but not so much that it kept me up later than I wanted. It's the kind of book that does well as a TV substitute. It reads like a movie, it's entertaining, and it's a bit suspenseful.
Just like a movie, though, there was what I would consider superfluous romance that distracted from the action and actual plot.
Frequently when a book includes foreign words or references to political or military organizations, I'm annoyed that the reader is assumed to have sufficient knowledge of the references; I appreciate it when additional context is given, or when a foreign phrase is subtly translated. However, I dare say that Ken Follett goes overboard: Is it really necessary to explicitly define the word "suffragette"?
Finally, near the end, I think the main character Flick made two uncharacteristic moves - she made a decision against her better judgment, and she didn't react quickly enough given the circumstances. I wonder why Follett weakened her character after spending so much time before and after developing her character. Maybe just to show that she's human and makes mistakes, too.
Anyway, I wasn't blown away by the book, but it's easy reading and the kind of book that's good for passing the time. Since Ken Follett is such a prolific writer, I'll probably pick up more of his books from the library from time to time.
mohaa's review against another edition
5.0
WWII-era Ken Follett historical fiction/spy suspense is always great. Even though we all know how the Normandy invasion went, you're still rooting for the heroes to help make it happen.