Reviews with content warning for Incest - The Secret History

Before you start reading my (spoiler-free) review, please note that I am not personally a fan of holding a book down and extracting every last semblance of meaning from it until it means nothing at all (at least in this case).

I picked up this book with no background knowledge other than it involved a murder and that it inspired the Dark Academia trend. In fact, I only picked up this novel because I wanted to read The Maidens by Alex Michaelides, and I saw that The Maidens had been somewhat inspired by The Secret History. This was also my first Donna Tartt novel.

That all being said, my review:

I normally don't enjoy novels or stories with morally grey (or in this case, morally deplorable) characters. I like to be able to root for at least one character, and in The Secret History... there is no such character. Everyone is awful, all of the time, and commit truly heinous deeds (I'm looking in particular at pages 453 and 484 of my copy).

However, Donna Tartt is incredible at inserting scenes that are beautiful and reel you in as a reader, almost making you forget that these are the worst people. You find out on page one that the narrator, Richard Papen, and his friends have killed one of their own: their friend and fellow Classics study Edmund "Bunny" Corcoran. The first line of the novel really drew me in well: "The snow in the mountains was melting and Bunny had been dead for several weeks before we came to understand the gravity of our situation."

Despite you as the reader knowing this from the start, the in-between scenes and lead-up to the murder, especially the hazy and blissful days spent at Francis's country home, make you believe that these people love and cherish one another, and that their friendship and idleness is something to aspire to. I think that is one of Tartt's strengths and very probably what may have drawn people in to create the Dark Academia aesthetic and willingly associate themselves with a fictional group of "friends" who do and say and think things I genuinely find quite disgusting.

I really, really enjoy Donna Tartt's writing style. If you're a fan of descriptive writing (even at the cost of potentially slowing the plot down), you would probably enjoy the writing style of The Secret History, if not the plot. Action does not happen quickly in The Secret History, not even when Bunny is killed. However, there are some really beautiful lines of prose and wonderful descriptions throughout this book that make it easy to picture what Richard sees.

I see a lot of talk describing Richard as an unreliable narrator; instead of saying that, I would say that the events of the novel are colored through his perception of them. It's a truly limited omniscient narrator, but you as a reader can "read between the lines" to see some things that Richard misses along the way.

All of the characters feel fully fleshed out, like real people instead of plot devices. I would say that the notable exception to this for most of the book is Camilla, the only girl among the Classics students. This is not because of Tartt not fleshing her out - in fact, her fleshed-outedness is more apparent as those aforementioned "in between the lines" moments. The reason she feels less real than the other characters is Richard's tendency to view her as a hazy, angel-like object of affection rather than the complex woman that she is, and I think that was conveyed brilliantly by Tartt. Camilla is often described in ethereal terms, and Richard often describes seeing her as though she is partially concealed by light, like it's too hard to look at her straight. We as readers therefore do not get to see her for who she is until very late in the novel, when Richard, despite his thoughts pertaining to her, is also forced to reckon with the reality of Camilla.

The ending of the novel (spoiler free!) I felt was appropriate. I truly could not have guessed where the characters may go or what kind of lives they would lead. I liked that it felt like Richard was updating us as if he was telling this all as a story in conversation rather than a way to tie up loose ends. Tartt doesn't seem to have an interest in tying loose ends, but she executes it in a way that left me feeling satisfied.

Overall, I give The Secret History 4/5 stars. The writing was excellent, but the first few chapters were excruciatingly long, and at times it felt like a slog with no breakpoints. The story kept me engaged and wanting to know what would happen next, but there were moments that made me feel a little sick (feel free to message me for a list of content warnings). I'm glad I read it, but I would be selective with who I recommended it to. These characters are definitely NOT to be idolized, and they are deeply flawed and Tartt seems to have meant them to be read as deeply flawed (almost like characters in a Greek tragedy). If you can recognize that and appreciate the novel for what it is, I think you would enjoy it.

Review done, here are a few of my favorite quotes:

"I watched it all happen quite calmly--without fear, withoutpity, without anything but a kind of stunned curiosity--so that the impression of the event is burned indelibly upon my optic nerves, but oddly absent from my heart." (276)

"How quickly he fell; how soon it was over." (277) - I want to say I like this line because it's a really striking example, in context, of hot topic, cold delivery that really left a mark on me in the moment of reading it.

"...in order to make our veneration of him seem more explicable; to make it seem something more, in short, than my own fatal tendency to try to make interesting people good." (512)

"Some things are too terrible to grasp at once. Other things--naked, sputtering, indelible in their horror--are too terrible to really ever grasp at all. It is only later, in solitude, in memory, that the realization dawns: when the ashes are cold; when the mourners have departed; when one looks around and finds oneself - quite to one's surprise - in an entirely different world." (278)

"What we took for a docile, ordinary weight (gentle plunk, swift rush to the bottom, dark waters closing over it without a trace) was in fact a depth charge, one that exploded quite without warning beneath the glassy surface, and the repercussions of which may not be entirely over, even now." (275)

Content Warnings

lemonboyandme's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I loved this book so much though it is very slow paced. So much happened in it and I’m still really confused about the ending.There were so many disturbing things in this books that I’ll never forget. But I’m happy that I didn’t leave this book halfway through when it was slow. It’s My favorite read of this year so far.

Content Warnings

rmh1711's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional funny mysterious sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

james1star's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

The Secret History is undoubtedly a very well written and theorised book, Tartt gifts us, in my opinion, the perfect balance of plot and character analysis alongside some truly exquisite passages. Without including many spoilers, all I can say for the plot is we follow the student Richard Papen as he tells the story of his time at Hampden College in Vermont. Not wanting to neglect the Greek he had previously studied, he joins the cohort headed by the odd teacher that is Julian, becoming close to him and his fellow classmates: Henry, Francis, Edmund (Bunny) and the twins Charles and Camilla. This group who I called ‘the Greeks’ in my notes lead fairly strange lives from fellow students at the college but one that certainly intrigues Richard. And then things happen…

This is for sure a Big Brain Energy book: there’s untranslated Ancient Greek, Latin and French in it, multi-syntaxes sentences containing ‘()’s ‘-‘s and lists within, parts inferred and much more. So whilst it’s not the most accessible and definitely makes you think, it’s still an enjoyable reading experience. Some parts went over my head but I did feel a bit intelligent I guess reading it. This may put some people off and I get that but personally I could follow well enough and enjoyed the engagement of my brain at times. The way Tartt pulls it all together with a multilayered plot and very nuanced characters shows her BBE off, she clearly knows her stuff and I guess wanted to show this off - however, the story and flow isn’t negatively impacted in doing so. I absolutely loved how parts were pieced together and everything just clicks in place, so so good!

The characters are primarily unlikable but you get to know them so well and in such depth that at times you do root for them, in essence wanting the baddies to get away with it. But they are jarringgggggggg. Like wow did they annoy me and it does get quite repetitive at points too. I think Bunny was the character I liked least and Francis most but there is nuance for days in this book. The developments, analysis and interactions between the characters is all done very well and intelligently so.

The things I didn’t particularly like all that much was how about the page 400 mark I felt it was at a great ending point but then it kept on going… and going… and going. I still enjoyed these parts in terms of writing style but the actual events weren’t to my taste in all honestly with certain plot points, a major plot twist I didn’t see coming, didn’t really add up all that well. Therefore, the messages the book portrays weren’t the best specifically in terms of suicide and reasons why people are led to it - a bit too much was left to the imagination. I also felt in this final third that I had spent too long with these characters (I’m not accustomed to long books btw) and their annoying qualities shone out a bit too much. I’d say an enhanced epilogue might have been a better solution or thinning out this part of the book I’d have preferred.

Overall, I would definitely recommend this book but look into the trigger warnings first as there are quite a few and know it’s written in a BBE pretentious way that might not appeal to everyone. I’m glad I read it and would be one I’d be interested in revisiting in a few years to see if I could get more out it. I’ve also just written this after finishing the book so I might add to this review in the coming days or possibly make a video for my YouTube channel.

Content Warnings

maddiemarina's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

i must admit i had high expectations for this book and while i wouldn‘t say i was disappointed, i definitely expected more. the writing style is fantastic and i quite like that the characters‘ flaws are the main focus of this, but for my taste it was too morally wrong — all of it. the characters are very unlikeable as well and the book was pretty slow. but it certainly is something different and it‘s kind of chilling, gotta give it that.

Content Warnings