lduquette's review against another edition

Go to review page

Explicit white male bias

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

clairebartholomew549's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative sad tense medium-paced

4.0

This book is brutal, gory, and completely depressing. It chronicles the aggressive settlement of native lands by white people, the political violence the tribes enacted in response and also sua sponte, and the slow vanishing of native culture. It's compulsively readable - Gwynne goes back and forth between decades, smartly telling history through the lens of different actors - and incredibly informative. This is a period of U.S. history that I don't know much about (which is obviously intentional by the education system) and it was all very interesting.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jeddicat's review against another edition

Go to review page

Graphic with horrific violence against women.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

yotchki's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative tense medium-paced

5.0

Historical non-fiction that reads like a novel. As brutal and unforgiving as it’s setting

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lareads36's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative reflective medium-paced

3.75

I can see how this popular culture book could reach more people than historical monographs. 

Overall the author recounts and makes the history come alive. At one point though, I felt he was renunerating atrocities on both sides too much.
the sixth impaled baby didn't have as much impact as the first five.
 

I will say however, I had been led to believe this was less history and more fiction. Inside not feeling that way reading it. Given my research, he glossed over a couple of points but didn't embellish. He does mention that Goodnight was the sole proprietor of the canyon when we know he was a part owner with financial backing from JA. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

brandiereadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective medium-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

acunkle's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional informative tense medium-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

pirateenthusiast's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.25

A well researched book. I learned a lot, but this is where the positives end. The language used in this book is repeatedly and horrendously racist. I'm not sure if this was the authors intention or not, but he portrays the Comanches and Native Americans as a whole as "backward stone age hunters". Gwynne claims to be providing an unbiased neutral book that shows both sides in an accurate light. He certainly succeeds in not straying away from the violence of the Comanches with his brutal and graphic descriptions, yet when he describes the violence of the other side, the terms are much more vague, giving the reader the wrong impression. Here is a list of words used in this book and the frequency that they appeared.

Native: 32
Indian(s): 1,177
Savage: 28
Primitive: 19
Redskin: 3
Squaw: 25
Indigenous: 1

Expand filter menu Content Warnings