Reviews with content warning for Racism - Meddling Kids

Reviews tagging 'Racism'

Meddling Kids by Edgar Cantero

7 reviews

professor_dinosaur's review against another edition

adventurous funny mysterious fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

I enjoyed myself, which I think is the single most important element of a book like this. It has a heart, and I think fans of Scooby-Doo who can stomach a lot of cheese will enjoy themselves too.

The biggest nick to my enjoyment was the stiffness of the characters. Though distinct and fun, they struggle to feel round in the way the narrative seems to ask of them, more “caricature” than “character.” I think the source material does a lot of leg work for this book. Without having the background knowledge of the Scooby-Doo cast, much of the characterization is fairly flat (ex. the term “jock” had considerable economy). Many of the interpersonal conflict feels stilted as a result, subservient to the action-plot. The prose can be very clever at times, and then too clever, almost like a charming but metaphor-bloated college essay. Action scenes got increasingly hard to follow, not impossible to understand but maybe too nitty-gritty-detail-heavy.

I know it’s a toss-up, but I found the switch between prose and the “play” style nice. I can see its utility - what would the author really do in between these snappy scenes anyways, write dialogue tags? When it came to the more self-aware parts of this fourth-wall-flirtation, I was skeptical. Especially references to “the camera” and whatnot. Really just felt out of place - there’s no cameras in Scooby-Doo.

Maybe I wasn’t the target demographic, but I felt the Big Bad was trite. The book can’t help this, if you are going to write “Children’s Property Meets Lovecraft,” you need Lovecraft there. It’s difficult to make that fresh, I respect that. The accomplice to the Big Bad, now she was fun (albeit again corny, but who really minds a corny villain?). She did a lot for the story, but she’s not in the story much. Oh, and “le epic twist” regarding her is not very rewarding. In fact, most of the “le epic twists” aren’t. A reader has scant opportunity to suspect that we were even meant to be looking for a deception. Y’know, like clues… like in Scooby-Doo. I found myself saying things more like “okay, sure, that’s plausible” than the much better “ah, I should’ve known!” Is this meant to be in the fashion of actual Scooby-Doo villains? Maybe. That’s where I give those elements a little leniency.

The whole “Scooby-Doo for adults” pitch was dicey with me the second Andy kicked those guys in the nuts. I never felt like the book treated its more serious “adult” themes with disrespect, but there were times (ex. Arkham Asylum, just about anything involving Peter) where the cartoon-ifying of adult (and traumatic) experiences gave me tonal vertigo. Maybe I can compare it to an Adult Swim program. This is where the prose did the book a disservice. It’s a difficult tightrope to walk, when you put “edgy” (read: adult) material into an otherwise playful book it can be hard not to fall back on “edgy” (read: angsty) prose. I think this issue is a symptom of the quirky prose and overwhelming identity of the book (Scooby-Doo x Lovecraft, you won’t forget this for a single page), and not one that spoiled the book for me. For the record, the scene where Andy kicked those guys in the nuts felt sort of like a Reddit comment, if that makes sense.

I feel like Andy uses Reddit. That’s all.

Content Warnings

itsheyfay's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

amweber's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0

Overall, I wanted to like this book much more than I did. The writing was jarring at times, but the more I read the more problematic it became. First off, if you’re looking for an edgy Scooby Doo that is way better than Velma, this isn’t it. Some research revealed that the author actually wanted to parallel the Famous Five by Enid Blyton, but his publishers didn’t know who that was. So he pivoted to Scooby Doo and I feel like it shows in his writing. The end result is a book that feels badly forced into a box for the sake of marketing.

There’s a ton of problematic stuff in this book that I detail in the spoiler tag.

Speaking of, Kerri and Andy’s relationship seems painfully one-sided. It kind of reminded me of that movie, Kissing Jessica Stein. Kerrie doesn’t seem to be attracted to Andy and it makes Andy seem almost predatory at times. I hate this because if this book had been written as Daphne and Velma actually falling in love I would have been SO into it. The predatory lesbian is also such a harmful stereotype.

And some trigger warnings: Kerri seems to be an alcoholic and Nate has hallucinations and has been in and out of treatment for his mental health. Both of these things seem to disappear by the end of the book after the Mystery that Haunts them is resolved. The character development throughout is very surface-level so I never really felt like I was in their heads to begin with, but that kind of fast resolution is not how this works.

The character of Dunia feels incredibly transphobic. She’s the villain we spend the most time with, as the giant Lovecraftian god doesn’t exactly speak. She is immortal and changes her gender to better disguise herself in the town, perpetuating the stereotype that trans people are tricky and deceptive. When the Blyton Summer Detective Club were kids, the villain was always a guy in a mask, so equating that with a trans identity is deeply troubling. She also claims that changing her gender was a simple and easy thing to accomplish…in the 90s. At one point she looks at Andy and says she should talk to her doctor and look into it. Transitioning is obviously much more complicated than that and can put trans people in real danger.

There’s also a racial slur in the book that is typically directed at Mexican people who enter the US. It comes out of nowhere. Now—Edgar Cantero is Spanish and there are a lot of complicated dynamics between Spanish people and Mexican people, such as colonialism, colorism, and anti-Mexican sentiment. The casual inclusion of the slur, even if its inclusion is Nate noting that their bully used to call Andy that, feel so jarring and unearned.

Additionally, the team essentially figures out who the Lovecraftian god is through a recitation of a legend from the area. It feels like an Indigenous legend is just being used as a plot point here to move the story along and this, combined with all the other problematic stuff I mentioned, really hurt my enjoyment of the book.

I wanted my first review here to be a more positive experience, but I ultimately cannot recommend this one.

Content Warnings

chloe_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

This book had a really solid mystery at its core but fell down on quite a few elements of its execution. Others have brought up most of my comments - the variable quality of the writing (including experimentation with breaking that fourth wall and script format which didn't really pay off), the repeated focus on one of the character's red hair and some very shaky handling of queer and native american content.

Content Warnings

seawarrior's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I read this book on vacation, which I think made it easier to finish than the first time I tried. The story is engaging and fast-paced, though the mystery wasn't as unique as I'd anticipated, and the characters didn't have the amount of depth to them that I prefer. There's plenty of fight scenes, but I don't particularly like reading those. This is definitely a book for people who are interested in H.P. Lovecraft's work, but I only recognize some of his themes and symbols from movie adaptions. So altogether, it wasn't a horrible read, but there were several elements to it that I didn't enjoy. The worst of all these is Andy's obsessive, one-sided romance with Kerri that is resolved by Andy treating Kerri like her girlfriend while Kerri still maintains that she is straight. I don't know why Cantero wouldn't just allow Andy to move on, or have Kerri discover that she is sapphic. I guess I would still recommend this book to people who are interested by the premise. Like I said, it isn't horrible, but it didn't appeal to me as much as I'd hoped.

Content Warnings

epeolatri's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

This has very easily become one of my new favorite novels. I loved the author’s writing style and humor. Each character was amazing and fucked up in their own way. Every time I thought I had it figured out something even crazier happened, right up until the last sentence.

Content Warnings

e_flah's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

Meddling Kids was a mixed experience -- the nostalgic Scooby Doo vibes were great and there were lots of truly bonkers shenanigans that felt true to the source material. On the other hand, the writing style was experimental in a way that I often found a bit frustrating. Meddling Kids is a book where the prose is basically a character itself as it demands to be acknowledged, rather than fading into the background to let the story take center stage. There's nothing wrong with this approach. I just personally didn't care for it and found it at odds with the tone of the plot.

Kerri and Andy were the reason I stuck with Meddling Kids. They were three-dimensional characters that reminded me of characters from the Scooby gang without feeling like cheap reproductions of them. Andy in particular won me over from the beginning. She's the fighter of the group who's also perfectly willing to be honest about when she's afraid.

If you really love Scooby Doo and like books that feel unlike anything else you've read, Meddling Kids may be the book for you.

Content Warnings

More...