klsreads's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny hopeful informative inspiring reflective tense medium-paced

3.5

There was a lot I really liked about this book. The scary look into far-right infiltrative journalism really put me on edge. Lavin is incredibly brave and principled. However, much of this book read like a collection of well-written journal articles. The overall story lacked cohesiveness. I enjoyed each section independently ("We Keep Us Safe" was a standout), but don't go into this expecting a deep dive into the path of online radicalism. It's good as a more intro-level text of vignettes. Lavin's writing is strong, personal, and emotional, though I found it repetitive (and I spent a fair amount of time looking up words). 3.5 stars.

"To those who find themselves uncomfortable with the operation of antifascists outside the comfortable bounds of institutions and, at times, the law, I remind you that the French partisans of World War II were acting illegally, while the Einsatzgruppen had the full support of German law. We tend to like our noble lawbreakers to be comfortably in the past, where time and death have sanitized them into heroes, and to suffer those who struggle against injustice in the present only grudgingly, if at all."

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

keeganrb's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

caseythereader's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative reflective tense medium-paced

3.75

 - I think it is important, when you can manage it, to look at horrible things straight on so you know what you're up against. That said, CULTURE WARLORDS is filled with some of the most horrifying and horrific things I've ever read, all the more terrifying because it's all happening right under our noses.
- I think if you've spent any time at all learning about (or experiencing) what the far right is up to, there isn't a lot of new information in this book. However, Lavin really does a great job of linking seemingly disparate ideologies, events, and social and governmental failures together to show how we arrived here. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

collins1129's review

Go to review page

dark informative fast-paced

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lily1304's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced

3.5

Unfortunately I was already fairly familiar with white supremacist organizing thanks to living in Minneapolis-St. Paul in 2020, but I actually learned a lot here about antifascism. Lavin even referenced Unicorn Riot, an independent journalist group I follow. I realized how much of their work documenting protests and infiltrating white supremacist groups online - that all falls under Lavin's conceptualization of antifascism. So I appreciated that perspective.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

acy's review

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

internationalreads's review

Go to review page

dark funny informative medium-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

yavin_iv's review

Go to review page

dark informative fast-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

happiestwhenreading's review

Go to review page

challenging dark informative sad tense medium-paced

4.0

This book really started to pop up in my Instagram feed after the siege of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Since the election – and especially since Trump has been banned from most (all?) social media, I’ve heard more and more about the radicalization of people through social media and this book seems like a great dive into that topic!

“The thing about hate, though, is it metastasizes. The thing about channels that are filled, twenty-four hours a day, with stachoastic violence–testosterone-filled megaphones shouting for blood–is that, sooner or later, someone is going to take them up on it…racist networks have proven over and over again that the steady dissemination of murderous propaganda leaves a trail of blood behind it.”
Talia Lavin, “Culture Warlords”

While I probably appreciated the chapter on social media the most (Chapter 7: Tween Racists, Bad Beanies, and the Great Casino Chase), I learned A LOT from this book and how the internet plays a big role in how white supremacy has gained a foothold in our current world. Coming off the heels of the 2020 Election, the insurrection of the Capital, and the banning of Trump on social media platforms, the question that is begging to be answered is: where do we go from here? How do we make changes that disallow hate to have a platform? And how do we heal this divide? Those are questions I don’t necessarily have an answer for, but I think this book is an important piece to strategizing out some possibilities.

One chapter of the book that I vehemently disagree with is Chapter 9: Antifa Civil War. Lavin says that Anitfa is “a collection of individuals scattered throughout the country who are loosely pursuing the same goal: preventing fascist, far-right organizing through a varity of tactics” (pgs 215-216), and that “more than anything, it’s a way to keep ourselves – and our more vulnerable friends and neighbors – safe in a world where hate wants to swallow us whole” (pg. 216). After all of the destruction of federal property in various cities in the United States, I do not believe them to be a tempored group and I believe Antifa’s actions are just as wrong as the alt-rights. I would like to believe there isn’t a place for either one of those extreme groups in our country, and I cling to the believe that more people feel this way than don’t. Admittedly, I am not well-researched in Antifa or their methods, but from the mainstream media, I am not a supporter of their tactics, and I had a hard time agreeing with Lavin on much of anything in this chapter.


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amarchetta's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective

3.0

I’m glad I read this book because it reflected the grueling work the author did in her research. It was difficult to get through due to the weight of the material present. I hate to give this a lower star rating because of the incredible insights the author could provide, but I didn’t find the flow/format of the book very readable. I can’t say anyone would enjoy reading the vicious hate spewed by the book’s subjects, but the work itself wasn’t as engrossing as I had hoped. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings