Reviews

Complete Works of William Shakespeare by William Shakespeare

steven_nobody's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

It took me three months to read all of Shakespeare's plays. When I say "read" I mean watch one or two or sometimes three productions of each play and using NOS as my guide. And what I mean by "all" is everything except Henry VIII and Two Noble Kinsmen. It was a lot time to invest but the best experience I've had in a long time. Yes, an experience of a lifetime.
Skipping Hamlet, here are my others favorites: Henry IV (both parts count as one), Merchant of Venice, As You Like It, Coriolanus, Othello, Measure for Measure, and Cymbeline.

rosekk's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

With the plays, I was continually conscious that I was reading something that was meant to be performed, which detracted from the experience a little bit. I still enjoyed a lot of them, though I have to confess the histories were not a very entertaining read for me. Pretty much any play where a Duke of Gloucester/Suffolk e.t.c. emerged I found required determination to read. I don't think that's Shakespeare's fault - it's almost certainly me. Other plays I took to well though, and have discovered a few favourites. Since I'm not a huge poetry lover (I really like some poems, but they're vastly outnumbered by the ones I don't care for), so I was pleasantly surprised to find myself enjoying the poems, especially the two longer ones.

zoes_human's review against another edition

Go to review page

I had this grand scheme where I was going to read and then watch all of Shakespeare's plays, but, as it turns out, I really couldn't give a fuck about the Bard.

ms_reads_a_lot's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I read Hamlet for a reading challenge.

nickjonesreadsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

There were a couple snatches of verse that sounded familiar. An interesting grouping of love poetry that was fun to read aloud.

sathyadgs95's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Shakespeare requires no introduction -- he is "the Bard," the most imposing playwright and storyteller in the English language. And "The Complete Works of Shakespeare" brings together every one of his plays, ranging from harrowing tragedies to airy little puffs of comedy -- and even the lesser plays are still brilliant.

The plays basically are divided into comedies, histories and tragedies. The tragedies are pretty much... tragic, the comedies are not always funny but end semi-happily, and the histories... well, dramatizations of history, which usually make a great deal more sense after some historical research.

And everybody has heard of the greats here -- the Scottish lord who murders his way to kingship, young lovers divided by a feud, a Moorish general who is driven mad with jealousy, an elderly king whose arrogance rips his life apart, a very cleaned-up version of Henry VIII's split from his first wife, the goofy Prince Hal and his growth into a great king. There are feuding fairies, bickering lovers, romantic tangles, Julius Caesar's demise, gender-bending, an exiled duke/magician on his island, and the infamous "pound of flesh" bargain.

But Shakespeare also wrote a bunch of lesser-known plays that often can't be so neatly categorized -- a rotten love affair during the siege of Troy, a Roman general attacking his own city, an Athenian gentleman embittered by humanity, Richard III's Machiavellian plot to become king, two sets of twins separated at birth, a corrupt judge obsessed with a lovely nun, Falstaff's doomed efforts to make money, and so on. Some of these ("Troilus and Cressida") aren't nearly as good as his "main" body of work, but they're still excellent.

For all Shakespeare's plays, it's best to read them AFTER you've seen a good performance. Otherwise, it's like reading a movie script to a movie you haven't seen -- easy to get lost, and the dramatic effects aren't easy to connect to. But if you've seen performances of any/all of Shakespeare's plays, then his vibrant stories and poetry leap off the page.

There are long eloquent speeches, puns, clever linguistic twists, and evocative language that soaks the play in atmosphere ("With sweet musk-roses and with eglantine/There sleeps Titania sometime of the night/Lull'd in these flowers with dances and delight..."). In fact, his plays are diamond mines of quotations -- some are infamous ("To be or not to be") and some of which have floated into public knowledge without labels ("Cowards die many times before their deaths/The valiant never taste of death but once").

And while some of his plays are basically fluff, he manages to weave in moral questions, criticism and explorations of the human soul. And his characters range as far as his plots -- kings and princes, teenage lovers, proud but doomed warriors, clever young ladies in drag, bratty queens, the witty but combative Beatrice and Benedick, and even the puppet-master mage Prospero.

Shakespeare's "Complete Works" is a must-have for anyone who loves the English language -- his writing was unparalleled, and even his lesser plays are a cut above the rest.

celestyna's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging fast-paced

3.5

mg15's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

didnt like it because me dumb :)

angelbabe_cj's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amanda_m_harwood's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

5.0