Reviews tagging 'Injury/Injury detail'

Mickey7 by Edward Ashton

19 reviews

aformeracceleratedreader's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

3.25

Overall an enjoyable quick sci-fi. Loved the setting and the centipede-like creatures, but the characters were kind of meh. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

robin_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated

3.75

This was a nice, easy and fast sci-fi read that could be read as standalone. Felt almost like a palette cleanser tbh.
I didn’t like some of the shortsightedness of the characters at times but all in all I would recommend this. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

itsnicholaslashay's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ababytapir's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Easy to read, an enjoyable sci fi adventure set on a new planet that doesn't make you think too hard, but does contain a sprinkling of ethics around cloning and colonisation. The main character is kinda dumb and I enjoyed that. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

araehop's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny reflective fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kellyofcali's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

A fun sci-fi read, I enjoyed the world and its history and the fact that while this had some small twists, it wasn't a full-on TWIST book but rather just a good story set within the confines and technology of another world. Excited to see the film!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

singalana's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

This book was a bit of a letdown. I want to like light sci-fi books so bad, but this just didn’t do it for me.

We follow a character called Mickey, who is an expendable at a newly established colony on a icy planet. That means that whenever something dangerous probably resulting in death needs to be doing, Mickey is the guy they sent to do it. Because every time Mickey dies, they make a new copy of him, with all the memories of the past Mickeys. Except this time things go wrong and now there are two Mickeys.

The book is told through Mickey’s POV, and few other notable characters are Mickey’s best friend (Berto), a woman he has a relationship with (Nasha) and the base’s commander Marshall. The characters lack depth, and even the relationships feel disingenuous. And it bothered me how Nasha’s and Mickey’s relationship played out in the book. Marshall is the most infuriating character of them all. 

Something about this book just felt off. The tone is light and bantery at the beginning, but then things take a slightly darker tone. At first I wanted to learn more about other colonies that failed and other expendables, but when the author delivered, it felt lukewarm at best. And in the beginning of the book we have a deus ex machina moment, and the ending is way too neat.

This book needed to pick out a tone and stick to it, give the characters more depth and explain the issues the characters are dealing with a little bit better. Now the plot feels paper thin. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cetortuga's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Me ha parecido increible el libro. Entronca con los problemas filosóficos presentes en la mejor ciencia ficción clásica a la vez que tiene un tono sencillo yaen narrador que se dirige directamente el lector. Me recuerda a la vez a Solaris y el Juego de Ender. Deseando leer más.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sarah984's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

This book started out fun and the voice was great, but the focus lingered way too long on Mickey absolutely failing in every way to stay hidden and not long enough on the entire plot, which was basically shoved into the last 50 pages. The antagonists were interesting but barely described and the solution that works in the end is ridiculous.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

schnaucl's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

I enjoyed it. 

The existence of Expendables raises a lot of questions only some of which are addressed, if not answered.

It makes total sense that people would have religious objections to Expendables, and even that it would be a major tenant of a religion.  Although I would think it would be problematic to 

If a person can only become an Expendable to be a terrible kind of guinea pig which will always be killed over (and over and over) I can see why it wouldn't appeal to people.   But it is more than a little surprising that it's not a technology utilized by the wealthy and powerful to extend their lifetimes indefinitely.   Not to actually be expendable, of course, just to live.

It's more than a little surprising that there's apparently no one involved in mental healthcare as part of the colony.   Leaving the position of the Expendable aside, the mental, emotional and physical stress of space travel and starting a colony would be tremendous.  But taking the Expendable into account, especially an Expendable who is conscripted, which it sounds like most are, how is there not mandatory counseling for that person?  Like every day.   Even before you get to the Ship of Theseus problem, how many times can a person remember dying in terrible and painful ways or just watch a video of it even without the actual memory and not develop crippling PTSD or become catatonic?  But there's no suggestion of that at all.   (Either that it's a concern or that Mickey experiences it).  I do get why there are occasions where it's important for the Expendable to remember what caused his or her death, but how does remembering being injected with different pathogens and then dying a long, painful death help.  What are they supposed to avoid, going to the doctor who is going to use them as a test subject?

The sociology of it is interesting, too.  Everyone (including the Expendable) is conditioned  to think of the Expendable as the same person, which means that a) people resent their "immortality" and b) no one appreciates their sacrifices.    And that sort of makes sense, too, from a good of the colony standpoint.   If people are allowed to realize that someone is essentially being tortured over and over, especially if that person was conscripted, they may decide that's unacceptable.  (Or they may well say if the Expendable is a prisoner he/she/they probably did something to deserve it and better someone who can be downloaded into a new body than a person with a  finite lifespan).

It's also unclear what the term of service is.  Is Mickey expected to stay in that position for the term of a natural lifespan, 1,000 years, 1,000 deaths?  Until the sun burns out?  Until the colony is firmly established? 

It's clear that Mickey7 and Mikey8 are different people.  Mickey7 is more empathetic by far.  And maybe it's attributable to Mickey8 being closer to starvation, or Mickey7 being saved by the crawler and having the memory of it happen.  It just seems like there should be more of an explanation since the difference in time between them is only six weeks.

Also, they're terraforming a planet with other sentient life and...it never occurs to them how doing so might affect that life?


Learning about the various colony failures was interesting.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings